Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

LOL!  Oh, the hypocrisy!

 

Sorry, fool me once with the "fact checkers" and "believe me when I tell you this" on the internet...


Here’s a fun idea for you to try once in your life:  respond to what someone has actually said instead of what you imagine they believe.

Posted
1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:


Here’s a fun idea for you to try once in your life:  respond to what someone has actually said instead of what you imagine they believe.

he thinks it's his board and he makes the rules.  he may be mentally ill.

Posted
1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

Here’s a fun idea for you to try once in your life:  respond to what someone has actually said instead of what you imagine they believe.

 

The idea that this guy examined the entirety of Twitter/X before Musk took over and found it to be more filled with disinformation is ridiculous on the face of it.  As with anything on the internet, go with a source you trust but even then have a degree of skepticism.  It's not a hard concept.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

The idea that this guy examined the entirety of Twitter/X before Musk took over and found it to be more filled with disinformation is ridiculous on the face of it.  As with anything on the internet, go with a source you trust but even then have a degree of skepticism.  It's not a hard concept.


Classic Strawman. 
 

Where does it say he has examined all of Twitter? You made up that claim simply to dismiss it. 
 

His specific claim, is that as an OSINT professional, he has never had a harder time verifying facts on the ground via Twitter. 
 

And to any rational person, the idea that eliminating verification and allowing bad faith users to boost their posts through money makes it hard to find accurate information seem… well, obvious. 

Edited by ChiGoose
Posted
1 hour ago, ChiGoose said:


Classic Strawman. 
 

Where does it say he has examined all of Twitter? You made up that claim simply to dismiss it. 
 

His specific claim, is that as an OSINT professional, he has never had a harder time verifying facts on the ground via Twitter. 
 

And to any rational person, the idea that eliminating verification and allowing bad faith users to boost their posts through money makes it hard to find accurate information seem… well, obvious. 

The OSINT professional hasn’t even finished his bachelors degree. Doesn’t mean he’s not an expert but I have had the advantage of working with people in his age group. Brilliant individuals that don’t know sh*t. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 hours ago, ChiGoose said:

Classic Strawman. 
 

Where does it say he has examined all of Twitter? You made up that claim simply to dismiss it. 
 

His specific claim, is that as an OSINT professional, he has never had a harder time verifying facts on the ground via Twitter. 
 

And to any rational person, the idea that eliminating verification and allowing bad faith users to boost their posts through money makes it hard to find accurate information seem… well, obvious. 

 

And you posted it because it trashes Musk/Twitter/X.  Which despite the fact that it has always been a place that anyone can use to make whatever claim they want, is still the pre-eminent breaking news source in the World.

 

There was tons of disinformation prior to Musk taking over.  It just benefitted your side so you didn't give a *****.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

And you posted it because it trashes Musk/Twitter/X.  Which despite the fact that it has always been a place that anyone can use to make whatever claim they want, is still the pre-eminent breaking news source in the World.

 

There was tons of disinformation prior to Musk taking over.  It just benefitted your side so you didn't give a *****.  


I think it’s telling that you seem incapable of not projecting your own assumptions on me. Are your arguments so weak you have to pretend I said things I never said or believe things I do not believe? Do you need that crutch so badly?

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Doc said:

 

And you posted it because it trashes Musk/Twitter/X.  Which despite the fact that it has always been a place that anyone can use to make whatever claim they want, is still the pre-eminent breaking news source in the World.

 

There was tons of disinformation prior to Musk taking over.  It just benefitted your side so you didn't give a *****.  

the MSM said musk bad. so they hate musk.

 

everything else is just them trying to rationalize or parrot why.

 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

I think it’s telling that you seem incapable of not projecting your own assumptions on me. Are your arguments so weak you have to pretend I said things I never said or believe things I do not believe? Do you need that crutch so badly?

 

They're not assumptions.  You've revealed yourself over the years.  

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Doc said:

 

They're not assumptions.  You've revealed yourself over the years.  


Nah, they are assumptions. Because they are wrong. But they fit your narrative so you need to place your feelings over the facts. Your arguments are weak as hell and so you need to make up a fake position to argue against. 

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

Nah, they are assumptions. Because they are wrong. But they fit your narrative so you need to place your feelings over the facts. Your arguments are weak as hell and so you need to make up a fake position to argue against. 

 

You Dems are all about feelings over facts.  You've made social issues your entire focus but end up making things worse because your puppet masters tell you what to think, even if it makes you hypocrites, lead you down the wrong path and then there needs to be major course corrections.  We've seen it with #metoo, BLM, "defund the police" and giving criminals more rights and sanctuary cities/illegal immigration.  This Palestinian conflict is the perfect example of how they get you to side with people you'd never support here in America, yet since they've told you that the "far" right government of Israel is bad, you do it.

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

You Dems are all about feelings over facts.  You've made social issues your entire focus but end up making things worse because your puppet masters tell you what to think, even if it makes you hypocrites, lead you down the wrong path and then there needs to be major course corrections.  We've seen it with #metoo, BLM, "defund the police" and giving criminals more rights and sanctuary cities/illegal immigration.  This Palestinian conflict is the perfect example of how they get you to side with people you'd never support here in America, yet since they've told you that the "far" right government of Israel is bad, you do it.


You’re doing it again. You’re assuming what I believe based on your own projections. 
 

Why do you keep doing this? Is it really that hard to engage actual words and arguments that you need to rely on just making stuff up about anyone you have any disagreement with?

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

 

 

lol.  Tick tock is full of people calling OBL a trailblazing hero.  quoting from the protocols and OBL himself.

 

 

 

Facebook has private pages full of pure hate.

 

 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...