Jump to content

Jerry Sullivan crosses the line. Comments against women.


Draconator

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

There have been several on this thread with this "world has just become so thin skinned now a days" viewpoint, not intending to single you out.

 

Generally when I read or hear stuff like this, the translation is "I miss the Good Old Days when women and minorities didn't feel confident and secure enough to actually complain when we made tired, marginalizing, put-downs, and I'm pissed I can no longer pass them off as 'jokes' and make my put-downs with impunity ".  You know, those days when they all quietly "went along to get along" and rolled their eyes in private .

 

I promise you, I could find a few pointed remarks and "jokes" that would have you squealing with indignation like a little piggy.  If we were face to face, 10 minutes to suss you out and a few range-finding remarks, and I could make your skin will look thin like the finest strudel dough.  Only you won't call it you being "thin skinned", you'll call it me being "ridiculous" and "disgusting" and "offensive", because, you know, You (plural, those expressing a similar viewpoint) get to be the sole judge and arbiter of that.

 

That's really what it's about: whether only one group gets to be the judge and arbiter of what's offensive, or whether other viewpoints count.

 

definitely making some assumptions that are a big stretch.  viewpoints count and acting with respect and civility towards everyone is commendable and should be the rule.  getting indignant and bent out of shape when someone makes such a comment is in fact casting judgement and not respecting that person.  every person deserves respect and the benefit of the doubt.    

much of our society is primed and ready to pounce at a moment's notice, in fact anger filled and looking for a place to direct it.  i wish that were not the case.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

About what tho? Detail about what?

Who was responsible for every front office bungle

Ralph vs. TD

Marv hired for GM , then Marv wanting to be HC again

AVP breaking his hand trying to keep TKO off of Bledsoe

 

… just to name a few, the tip of the iceberg, the list can go on and on.

 

ETA: The 2004 Steelers game, including Bledsoe at coin toss picking the wrong side of the field from what Meathead wanted… he could write a whole chapter on that game. Also Ralph telling Wade to start RJ in the playoffs instead of Flutie… GOLD

Edited by Rico
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nextmanup said:

Your comments here, generally speaking, stand out like a shining light is a darkness of ignorance and homerism. 

 

Almost no one here (other than me and maybe 3 others) gets this.

 

It's nice to know someone does.

 

Listen to Sal C.'s questions in post-game press conferences.  He literally asks, soft, juicy, leading questions as though he is trying to help the interview subject with his answer.

 

"Coach, it must have been rewarding to see the defensive backfield play so well now that it's gotten healthier, wasn't it?"  Yeah, that's a great question Sal.


Sal is jock strap sniffing pro football player wannabe, who thinks he is actually a PART of the team and the NFL because he is allowed to watch some practices and walk around on the sideline gathering information for the radio broadcast.  He thinks he's on the team and he is "in the NFL."

 

It's kind of sad.

 

 

Suck Up Season 3 GIF by The Office

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rico said:

Who was responsible for every front office bungle

Ralph vs. TD

Marv hired for GM , then Marv wanting to be HC again

AVP breaking his hand trying to keep TKO off of Bledsoe

 

… just to name a few, the tip of the iceberg, the list can go on and on.

 

Meh. Sounds like a snoozer about stuff we already know and moved on from. I feel like simply going through the TSW archive from those years could get you the same thing, probably with better commentary. If you want to wallow in those years for some reason, do what you need to do. But I doubt much of the fanbase wants to rehash that time when we have such a great team with a bright future to focus on right now.

 

Sully is officially washed up. His next move should be writing scotch or wine reviews for the local pennysaver.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Rico said:

Who was responsible for every front office bungle

Ralph vs. TD

Marv hired for GM , then Marv wanting to be HC again

AVP breaking his hand trying to keep TKO off of Bledsoe

 

… just to name a few, the tip of the iceberg, the list can go on and on.

 

ETA: The 2004 Steelers game, including Bledsoe at coin toss picking the wrong side of the field from what Meathead wanted… he could write a whole chapter on that game. Also Ralph telling Wade to start RJ in the playoffs instead of Flutie… GOLD

Do you really think that a guy who isn't smart enough to keep the "women are the worst fans" thought to himself is keeping juicy details about the Bills to himself?  He would have spilled all of those details if he had anything negative about the Bills.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Meh. Sounds like a snoozer about stuff we already know and moved on from. I feel like simply going through the TSW archive from those years could get you the same thing, probably with better commentary. If you want to wallow in those years for some reason, do what you need to do. But I doubt much of the fanbase wants to rehash that time when we have such a great team with a bright future to focus on right now.

 

Sully is officially washed up. His next move should be writing scotch or wine reviews for the local pennysaver.

This thread is already 30 pages long over someone who’s been washed for years. If he did it right, everyone would be talking about it, and it would sell. Even those who would cry the loudest would be bending over backwards to see what he wrote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:

Yes you nailed it. It is very sad. He is supposed to be a journalist not their buddy. And then WGR, every single day, "lets talk to Sal" geee I wonder what he's going to say? praise this guy, that guy, its useless

 

Is it so shocking to believe that someone would disagree with you that it must be a conspiracy??

 

Newsflash, Jerry Sullivan probably doesnt even read this silly blog site, let alone take the time to make multiple accounts

 

You mad, bro?

  • Haha (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2022 at 10:20 AM, Rico said:

Wouldn’t be surprised if they also tried to cancel Howard Stern back-in-the-day. Haters gonna hate.

He was no holds barred politically incorrect to put it mildly - I haven't heard his show since the satellite deal but I imagine it is a LOT different than it used to be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:

Yes you nailed it. It is very sad. He is supposed to be a journalist not their buddy. And then WGR, every single day, "lets talk to Sal" geee I wonder what he's going to say? praise this guy, that guy, its useless

 

Is it so shocking to believe that someone would disagree with you that it must be a conspiracy??

 

Newsflash, Jerry Sullivan probably doesnt even read this silly blog site, let alone take the time to make multiple accounts


Jerry! It is you! Confirmed. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SUNY_amherst said:

Yes you nailed it. It is very sad. He is supposed to be a journalist not their buddy. And then WGR, every single day, "lets talk to Sal" geee I wonder what he's going to say? praise this guy, that guy, its useless

 

Is it so shocking to believe that someone would disagree with you that it must be a conspiracy??

 

Newsflash, Jerry Sullivan probably doesnt even read this silly blog site, let alone take the time to make multiple accounts

Do you really think Two Bills Drive is a blog?

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:

Must be a conspiracy huh guys, god forbid someone disagrees with you or shares a similar opinion as someone else

But yet you refuse to answer questions directly. 

 

Do you think Two Bills Drive is a blog site? Yes or No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SUNY_amherst said:


Idk I’m kinda new here but it appears to be mostly fanboys with strong opinions.
 

I don’t really care what that is categorized as, but you sure seem to care. Why don’t you tell me?

 

 

well, you are on a bills fan site.

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SUNY_amherst said:


Idk I’m kinda new here but it appears to be mostly fanboys with strong opinions.
 

I don’t really care what that is categorized as, but you sure seem to care. Why don’t you tell me?

 

 

It's really not that hard to figure out. 

 

A blog is one person's opinion, mostly closed to replies from Russian bots promising dates with hot Russian women.

 

A message board is many persons, with either an exchange of ideas or promises of dates with hot Russian women. 

 

Something tells me you'd accept the date with the hot Russian woman.

 

As for me, I'm happily married to my personal version of Paige Spiranic. We "golf" a lot. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...