RenoNVBillsfan Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 Gotta shout out to my guy Isaiah Hodgins. Back-to-back games with receiving TD’s. Feel for the dude having to deal with the putrid passing ability of Daniel Jones. The guy hasn’t passed beyond 200 yards in the past 2 games. 56.5 QBR for the season. Imagine the red zone threat he could have been had the Bills retained him. After watching McKenzie be less than inspiring this season, I still believe the Bills cut the wrong Isaiah. 4 1 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, RenoNVBillsfan said: After watching McKenzie be less than inspiring this season, I still believe the Bills cut the wrong Isaiah. Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions. If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player. Edited December 12, 2022 by BillsFanForever19 5 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxum Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 1 hour ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions. If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player. Jake Kumerow is a solid blocking WR something Isaiah Hodgins has never shown. The Jiants appear to be a team on rise waiting for a QB like Bills were when Coach McD took over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Junction Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 43 minutes ago, Limeaid said: Jake Kumerow is a solid blocking WR something Isaiah Hodgins has never shown. The Jiants appear to be a team on rise waiting for a QB like Bills were when Coach McD took over. They certainly seem to be replicating the McBeane formula in Jersey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chandler#81 Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 4 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions. If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player. uuum.. no. McKenzie is NOT a return man. He’s simply too small for that (arms aren’t long enough to safely protect the football upon contact). You’ll only see him if 3 other return guys go down to injury. He can’t run precise routes, nuts up under contact or contested catch attempts and can’t block ..well.. ME! I don’t care what anyone else thinks, he shouldn’t be on the team. I’d much prefer playing against him over with him. 1 2 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KHAN Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 Camp heros's are a thing. Blackshear also had a touchdown yesterday. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanForever19 Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 22 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said: uuum.. no. McKenzie is NOT a return man. He’s simply too small for that (arms aren’t long enough to safely protect the football upon contact). You’ll only see him if 3 other return guys go down to injury. He can’t run precise routes, nuts up under contact or contested catch attempts and can’t block ..well.. ME! I don’t care what anyone else thinks, he shouldn’t be on the team. I’d much prefer playing against him over with him. Okay, but it's something he's done and could do. Even if you remove that from his repertoire, the point is moot. Isaiah Hodgins for Isaiah McKenzie is not something that would happen as they are completely different WR's that line up and play completely differently. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hemma Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 24 minutes ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Okay, but it's something he's done and could do. Even if you remove that from his repertoire, the point is moot. Isaiah Hodgins for Isaiah McKenzie is not something that would happen as they are completely different WR's that line up and play completely differently. I agree, very different. Hodgins catches the ball. McKenzie doesn’t. 2 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuncha Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 McKenzie is a huge disappointment at WR. Good gadget guy/return guy but bad WR. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SectionC3 Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 6 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Except Isaiah McKenzie is a speed slot WR, gadget player, return man and Isaiah Hodgins is a tall outside WR that doesn't play Special Teams. They'd never cut McKenzie for Hodgins. They basically play two different positions. If anyone was getting cut for Hodgins, it would have been Jake Kumerow. But when healthy he's also a very solid Special Teams player. Hodgins could be a big slot. Something that we could use right now. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frostbite Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 3 hours ago, BillsFanForever19 said: Okay, but it's something he's done and could do. Even if you remove that from his repertoire, the point is moot. Isaiah Hodgins for Isaiah McKenzie is not something that would happen as they are completely different WR's that line up and play completely differently. He had one good return against Miami 2 years ago but in reality, he's a liability back there. The coaching staff doesnt trust him anymore hence the Hines trade. Mackenzie's only use is a gadget play but even those havent been working. To me, Mackenzie has lost his right to start with the amount of drops and boneheaded plays. Time to give Shakir a chance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 (edited) Our #2 WR the last 5 weeks: 24 receptions, 245 yards, 2 TDs. A former Bill who the Giants picked up off of waivers the last five weeks: 17 receptions, 183 yards, 2 TDs. Happy for him and I have never been in the "meh, he can't block or play special teams, dump him" camp. No way am I saying that IH is better than GD (although the comments after this will no doubt claim that's what I am saying). It's just frustrating what is going on with this team, especially at that position that is so critical to making our system go. Give me an "incomplete" or "alternative skill deficient" receiver who is a good size and can catch [EDIT]...every time, because I don't think Josh Allen stays awake at night wondering if his receivers can tackle on kickoffs. Edited December 12, 2022 by dollars 2 donuts 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 (edited) If you’re not playing ST’s as a WR 5 or whatever you won’t make this roster. Simple as that. Good for Hodgins, but he’s hardly some tonic for the offense. I think the staff wanted to see more from him that never materialized. Edited December 12, 2022 by Boatdrinks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan in Cleveland Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 3 hours ago, Chandler#81 said: uuum.. no. McKenzie is NOT a return man. He’s simply too small for that (arms aren’t long enough to safely protect the football upon contact). You’ll only see him if 3 other return guys go down to injury. He can’t run precise routes, nuts up under contact or contested catch attempts and can’t block ..well.. ME! I don’t care what anyone else thinks, he shouldn’t be on the team. I’d much prefer playing against him over with him. I'm done with the McKenzie experience as well. Give me John Brown or Shakir in the slot. With Brown and Diggs on the field at the same time, either can go deep or across the field. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dollars 2 donuts Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said: If you’re not playing ST’s as a WR 5 or whatever you won’t make this roster. Simple as that. Good for Hodgins, but he’s hardly some tonic for the offense. I think the staff wanted to see more from him that never materialized. Very respectfully, BD, that is about important to me as "if you didn't practice this week you can't play on Sunday" and "you can't lose your job to injury." I don't care if a guy actually helps the opposing team on special teams as long as the guy they are going to be paying 45 million dollars trusts and finds him a few times a game for 1st downs and TDs I am comfortable with it. ...and the proof being that essentially a waiver wire walk-on being a productive part of any offense when he is not even remotely the main guy is a potentially valuable tool for any QB to have in his arsenal bag. Edited December 12, 2022 by dollars 2 donuts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luka Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 Still can't figure out what went into evaluating the receivers in the offseason. Hodgins, Shakir, Diggs and Davis would've made a hell of a group. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 3 hours ago, hemma said: I agree, very different. Hodgins catches the ball. McKenzie doesn’t. And yet McKenzie is right behind Diggs for catch % with 69.1%, how can this be when he doesn't catch the ball? Hodgins (when with the Bills) has a lower catch % with 66.7%, how can this be when he catches the ball "unlike McKenzie"? (Hodgins has a better catch % with the Giants, so good for him!) 12 minutes ago, Luka said: Still can't figure out what went into evaluating the receivers in the offseason. Hodgins, Shakir, Diggs and Davis would've made a hell of a group. You know Shakir gets ~16 snaps per game on average, right? More vs Detroit, 12 yesterday. He's been targeted 17 times and has 8 receptions. I would have liked to see the Bills keep Hodgins. I think it was bad luck as far as injuries at other positions that led to him being waived. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luka Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Beck Water said: And yet McKenzie is right behind Diggs for catch % with 69.1%, how can this be when he doesn't catch the ball? Hodgins (when with the Bills) has a lower catch % with 66.7%, how can this be when he catches the ball "unlike McKenzie"? (Hodgins has a better catch % with the Giants, so good for him!) You know Shakir gets ~16 snaps per game on average, right? More vs Detroit, 12 yesterday. He's been targeted 17 times and has 8 receptions. I would have liked to see the Bills keep Hodgins. I think it was bad luck as far as injuries at other positions that led to him being waived. I know he isn't getting enough snaps, yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beck Water Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 Just now, Luka said: I know he isn't getting enough snaps, yes. So what is he doing in the snaps he gets, and with the targets he gets, which you can show to us as evidence he should be getting more? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luka Posted December 12, 2022 Share Posted December 12, 2022 1 minute ago, Beck Water said: So what is he doing in the snaps he gets, and with the targets he gets, which you can show to us as evidence he should be getting more? It's all based on chemistry and trust, if Josh isn't given the opportunity to build those things with him, it will continue to be a stalemate. This isn't baseball, too many fans on this board with percentages and decimal points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.