BuffaloBills1998 Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Here we go again. No, he didn’t. He admitted to sleeping with her. He didn’t know she was underage, there are witnesses that say she was telling everyone she was in college, and in CA that’s defensible toward it being a criminal offense Doesn’t matter regardless he admitted to sleeping with her and she was underage. That alone legally would have to make him register as a sex offender. It’s statutory rape. 6 3
Beach Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 did the Court of Public Opinion act hastily again? 1
Draconator Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 Just now, BuffaloBills1998 said: Doesn’t matter regardless he admitted to sleeping with her and she was underage. That alone legally would have to make him register as a sex offender. It’s statutory rape. 2
Billznut Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 11 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said: Does that mean social media rushing to judge him guilty before police/prosecutor investigated the claims was a mistake ? As did dozens of posters on here
Blank Stare Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 Sign him to the PS. Martin is only on a 1 year deal. 2 2
HardyBoy Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 1 minute ago, Big Turk said: Probably didn't help her case when she was caught on video saying she was planning to "add more than 1 to her body count" that night before any of it happened. So someone looking for sex from someone at some point can't be raped? Adding one more to the body count to me also says she's had plenty of sex (no judgment)...has she raised rape allegations before? If anything, this helps support her case imo. Why was this time different? Also, can you even give consent if you're hammered? 1
Boatdrinks Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 12 minutes ago, RiotAct said: or, they have suspicions that he did something but don’t want to waste taxpayer dollars for a trial that will almost certainly end with an acquittal. In other words , not guilty. Suspicions don’t mean squat.
JoPoy88 Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 1 minute ago, BuffaloBills1998 said: Doesn’t matter regardless he admitted to sleeping with her and she was underage. That alone legally would have to make him register as a sex offender. It’s statutory rape. not that cut and dry in CA. I’m not gonna rehash all of it again, go read the original Araiza thread if you have a few hours. But there are defenses to statutory rape in California. 2
The Firebaugh Kid Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 7 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Guessing you did not see the video of the girl bragging about how she was going to be adding more than 1 to her body count that night? My guess is she imagined it being more enjoyable than it was (3:1), and decided to stir up some **** afterwards.
Alphadawg7 Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 5 minutes ago, Ethan in Cleveland said: And another assault is swept under the rug. No wonder why women often do not go to the police or school to report an assault. They immediately become the accused not the other way around. Sad. And you know this is what happened how? Can you provide the board with the results of your interviews of the witnesses, examining of all the evidence the police have, etc that led you to conclude he is guilty and its just being swept under the rug? You do realize it's entirely possible that an assault DID happen to this woman and that Araiza did NOT participate or have anything to do with it right? 2 1
YoloinOhio Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 1 minute ago, BuffaloBills1998 said: Doesn’t matter regardless he admitted to sleeping with her and she was underage. That alone legally would have to make him register as a sex offender. It’s statutory rape. Is it? Quote Having an attorney who specializes in defending against California sex crimes is the key to safeguarding your rights and protecting your future. A good attorney knows that there are certain legal defenses that can help you beat the charges. Two of the most helpful legal defenses are: You honestly and reasonably believed the minor was over 18, and No actual sexual intercourse took place. https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/penal-code/261-5/ 1
Big Turk Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, BuffaloBills1998 said: Doesn’t matter regardless he admitted to sleeping with her and she was underage. That alone legally would have to make him register as a sex offender. It’s statutory rape. Some states it doesn't matter, some states it does. It DOES matter in California: 1) Mistake of age: If you honestly and reasonably believed that the person you had sex with was over 18 at the time you had sex, you can’t be convicted under California statutory rape law. https://quinnanlaw.com/sexual-assault/california-statutory-rape/#:~:text=1) Mistake of age%3A If,under California statutory rape law. Edited December 7, 2022 by Big Turk 2
DaBillsFanSince1973 Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 1 minute ago, TheProcess said: Sign him to the PS. Martin is only on a 1 year deal. would he want to come back to the bills. I realize they had to do what they had to do but, it could of left bad vibes and he signs elsewhere?
DapperCam Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 14 minutes ago, Big Turk said: Basically it sounds like they concluded the girl is full of crap and that Araiza didn't do anything wrong. That isn’t what it means. It means they know it is a he-said she-said (as these frequently are) and there isn’t a good chance they will win in court. Doesn’t mean she’s full of crap at all. If they didn’t have good physical evidence, or camera footage, or other evidence like witnesses then there isn’t much they can do.
plenzmd1 Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 1 minute ago, HardyBoy said: So someone looking for sex from someone at some point can't be raped? Adding one more to the body count to me also says she's had plenty of sex (no judgment)...has she raised rape allegations before? If anything, this helps support her case imo. Why was this time different? Also, can you even give consent if you're hammered? Cause the dude was a pro football player, and for a punter a rather high profile one at that.Did the girl or the attorney publicly name any of the other 5 guys and wage a social media war on them?
YoloinOhio Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 1 minute ago, KDIGGZ said: Cleveland Browns on line 1... Not happy with bojo?
billsbackto81 Posted December 7, 2022 Posted December 7, 2022 10 minutes ago, Warcodered said: Pretty sure he's still being sued though right? Sued for what? What does he have? What's she gonna get? San Diego St season tickets and a lifetime supply of prophylactics.
Recommended Posts