Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Gugny said:

 

 

How can you agree with that?  I've read it at least 10 times and still have no idea what it says!!

 

Believe it or not, posts are not peer reviewed prior to being submitted and typos happen on message board posts.  No need to be an overly critical ass clown, get over yourself. This isn’t ENG101 and you’re not the professor.  

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, TheWeatherMan said:

Believe it or not, posts are not peer reviewed prior to being submitted and typos happen on message board posts.  No need to be an overly critical ass clown, get over yourself. This isn’t ENG101 and you’re not the professor.  

 

You mad, bro?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

This bit is correct. But again it comes back to the point. What are you supposed to do if you don't have a top 3 Quarterback? Bills fans have suddenly become total QB snobs. We have Josh and other teams don't so nobody anyone else has is any good. Dak isn't elite. But he is a darn good QB. A top 10 QB. 

Not saying I disagree with the top 10, but for S and G’s what QBs do you have over him?

Posted
4 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said:

Believe it or not, posts are not peer reviewed prior to being submitted and typos happen on message board posts.  No need to be an overly critical ass clown, get over yourself. This isn’t ENG101 and you’re not the professor.  

giphy.gif

 

"Ohhhh BABY!!!"

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

The problem is the major inefficiency in the QB market and you are right it is because demand outstrips supply. There are like three tiers of guys and then the teams who just flat out don't have a QB....

 

There is the elite tier: Josh, Mahomes, Burrow (who knows whether you still put Rodgers here or not, depends how he feels)

Then a bunch of franchise guys: this is the tier the Dak, Stafford, Lamar, Carr, Herbert (he can make the top group but he hasn't yet) etc fall in

Then there are the placeholder starters: Jared Goff and Jimmy G are the classic examples of this right now

Then there are the teams who don't have a quarterback: Colts, Jets, Saints, Panthers etc...

 

There are obviously always a few teams who haven't worked out which of these their young guy falls in... but broadly it is those 4 tiers. The problem is the market delineates between tier 2 and 3 pretty well, but not very well between tiers 1 and 2. So rather than the tier 2 guys costs $6-8m a year less which might be one or even two extra impact players they are pretty much the same price when they sign their deals. So you have a couple of seasons before the market has jumped again where you are hamstrung. Because the elite guys make up for those 1 or 2 extra impact players you are missing. The franchise guys don't quite do that. 

 

I wouldnt even put Stafford there anymore.  I think he's done. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Depending on the type of PCL sprain, Lamar should be back no later than 4 weeks. The Ravens' next 4 games? The Steelers, the Browns, the Falcons, and the Steelers. Baltimore should be fine. They close out with Cincy. He will be back by then. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, TheWeatherMan said:

He had an all pro offensive line, 2 great backs, 3 great WR’s and an above average TE yet still lost in the first round of the playoffs to a Jimmy G led team.  Dak is extremely inconsistent and in no way worthy of the contract he signed.  If JA was the QB got the Cowgirls that would 100% be the best team in football 3 years running.  

 

Agree, but whats the alternative?  Let him go and start over and hope you get someone better?  The odds aren't in their favor.  The year Allen was drafted was rated as one of the all time best QB classes ever, second to 1983.  Look at it now, one superstar, one very good, (Jackson) 2 FA, and one starting right now, but more out of desperation.  

 

The simple answer is the Cowboys should have paid him less.  But Dak would had to have agreed to that and not very likely he would have as some other team just as dumb and just as desperate as Dallas would have offered him as much, maybe even more to leave Dallas.  Teams sign these guys, fringe stars to contracts only worthy of the elite and cross their fingers that maybe he'll improve even just a little bit as a little bit could get them over the top.

 

Will be interesting to see what happens in Baltimore.  Will Jackson realize his ship has passed and he needs to sign for less or again will some other team think they can fix him and offer him the big bucks.  Likely he'll be tagged, but that only works so long.  That's also a big risk on Jackson's part, more than the average player as much as he gets banged up.   I'll bet the big bucks from some team.

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Ed_Formerly_of_Roch said:

 

Agree, but whats the alternative?  Let him go and start over and hope you get someone better?  The odds aren't in their favor.  The year Allen was drafted was rated as one of the all time best QB classes ever, second to 1983.  Look at it now, one superstar, one very good, (Jackson) 2 FA, and one starting right now, but more out of desperation.  

 

The simple answer is the Cowboys should have paid him less.  But Dak would had to have agreed to that and not very likely he would have as some other team just as dumb and just as desperate as Dallas would have offered him as much, maybe even more to leave Dallas.  Teams sign these guys, fringe stars to contracts only worthy of the elite and cross their fingers that maybe he'll improve even just a little bit as a little bit could get them over the top.

 

Will be interesting to see what happens in Baltimore.  Will Jackson realize his ship has passed and he needs to sign for less or again will some other team think they can fix him and offer him the big bucks.  Likely he'll be tagged, but that only works so long.  That's also a big risk on Jackson's part, more than the average player as much as he gets banged up.   I'll bet the big bucks from some team.

 

I just think Jackson is crazy.  The Ravens offered him the right contract.  He just wanted to be fully guaranteed like Watson.  I dont think he is worth that and I think the team is stupid if they pay that.  I also thought the Murray contract was stupid.  As for Dak... I think that was fine.  I think they were stupid for paying Zeke instead at first.

Edited by Scott7975
Posted
10 hours ago, TheWeatherMan said:

Not saying I disagree with the top 10, but for S and G’s what QBs do you have over him?

 

Over Dak? Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, Herbert, Rodgers, Brady, Stafford (when healthy).... then after that I think Dak, Lamar, Jalen Hurts and Carr are the next 4 and I'd probably have them in that order. Hurts may still be ascending we don't know if we have seen his ceiling yet. The other three we know the ceiling but they have track records over a number of years of good play.

10 hours ago, Scott7975 said:

 

I wouldnt even put Stafford there anymore.  I think he's done. 

 

We will see what he looks like when he returns. He might be. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Over Dak? Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, Herbert, Rodgers, Brady, Stafford (when healthy).... then after that I think Dak, Lamar, Jalen Hurts and Carr are the next 4 and I'd probably have them in that order. Hurts may still be ascending we don't know if we have seen his ceiling yet. The other three we know the ceiling but they have track records over a number of years of good play.

 

We will see what he looks like when he returns. He might be. 


I was a bit critical/weary of Hurts as a passer early in the season. Some of his throws the last few weeks have been really impressive. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Just checking in to see if Lamar has had the leg amputated yet.  That’s what Dr. Chao suggested needs to happen on Twitter.

 

Posted
32 minutes ago, eball said:

Just checking in to see if Lamar has had the leg amputated yet.  That’s what Dr. Chao suggested needs to happen on Twitter.

 

But Dr. Ho is merely suggesting one (or more) of his fine therapeutic devices be purchased, and used by Jackson.

Posted
15 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

This bit is correct. But again it comes back to the point. What are you supposed to do if you don't have a top 3 Quarterback? Bills fans have suddenly become total QB snobs. We have Josh and other teams don't so nobody anyone else has is any good. Dak isn't elite. But he is a darn good QB. A top 10 QB. 

I wouldn’t say snobs, but poster is correct. If they had Josh Burrows or Mahomes could easily have been on a two or three SB run. 
 

Dak is good but I don’t believe can get you there. 
 

anyway F the Cowboys I hate them so glad they haven’t represented 

 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Over Dak? Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, Herbert, Rodgers, Brady, Stafford (when healthy).... then after that I think Dak, Lamar, Jalen Hurts and Carr are the next 4 and I'd probably have them in that order. Hurts may still be ascending we don't know if we have seen his ceiling yet. The other three we know the ceiling but they have track records over a number of years of good play.

 

We will see what he looks like when he returns. He might be. 

I see Herbert in roughly the same position in most lists like this but every week he and his coach do something stupid to lose a game.  At what point does that stop being ignored as if it were the exception?  I see the raw talent but he’s as dumb as a box of rocks.  Hurts, when I watch, seems to consistently avoid dumb mistakes.  Personally I’d move him up.  I agree with others moving Stafford down based on age/health.

 

Does Tua fit in your “after that” group?  I’d guess that Lawrence will get there and Watson will re-emerge at some point.

 

 

Posted
5 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Over Dak? Allen, Mahomes, Burrow, Herbert, Rodgers, Brady, Stafford (when healthy).... then after that I think Dak, Lamar, Jalen Hurts and Carr are the next 4 and I'd probably have them in that order. Hurts may still be ascending we don't know if we have seen his ceiling yet. The other three we know the ceiling but they have track records over a number of years of good play.

 

We will see what he looks like when he returns. He might be. 

 

My 2 cents, current (as in, not based on past performance or future projections), and not in order, just grouped:

 

Top Tier

  • Allen
  • Mahomes
  • Burrow

The Next Level

  • Herbert
  • Rodgers
  • Brady
  • Lamar
  • Hurts

Emerging (or Emerged and descending)

  • Tagovailoa
  • Prescott
  • Stafford
  • Carr
  • Lawrence
  • Garoppolo

Who am I missing? Flame away . . .

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, CSBill said:

 

My 2 cents, current (as in, not based on past performance or future projections), and not in order, just grouped:

 

Top Tier

  • Allen
  • Mahomes
  • Burrow

The Next Level

  • Herbert
  • Rodgers
  • Brady
  • Lamar
  • Hurts

Emerging (or Emerged and descending)

  • Tagovailoa
  • Prescott
  • Stafford
  • Carr
  • Lawrence
  • Garoppolo

Who am I missing? Flame away . . .

Bears look like they have a QB of the future, Dirt bag Watson if he can turn it around, possibly Goff, and as crazy as it sounds (I won’t say his name) the QB from Seattle.  

Posted
31 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

I see Herbert in roughly the same position in most lists like this but every week he and his coach do something stupid to lose a game.  At what point does that stop being ignored as if it were the exception?  I see the raw talent but he’s as dumb as a box of rocks.  Hurts, when I watch, seems to consistently avoid dumb mistakes.  Personally I’d move him up.  I agree with others moving Stafford down based on age/health.

 

Does Tua fit in your “after that” group?  I’d guess that Lawrence will get there and Watson will re-emerge at some point.

 

 

 

The top 7 wasn't necessarily a ranking so much as it was the order I thought of them. I take the point on Herbert, I have commented on his 3rd Quarter disappearing acts and I get it, if they miss the playoffs this year he is 0-3 but I am also not as in love with the Chargers roster as other people and two of their best players - Bosa and Slater - are on IR. I think they are a less well coached version of the Bills in a sense in that week after week I see them asking Herbert to do too much. The Bills are better, Allen is better and McDermott is better... but they also have a tendency to ask the QB to do too much. 

 

I don't move folks down on age or health. Only performance and I am generally slow to move people up and down. Tua is an example of that. Based on this year he absolutely has a case to be in that next group. But 10 games isn't a big enough sample size. I give Hurts a bit more leeway because I think he was very clearly trending this way last year. 

15 minutes ago, CSBill said:

 

My 2 cents, current (as in, not based on past performance or future projections), and not in order, just grouped:

 

Top Tier

  • Allen
  • Mahomes
  • Burrow

The Next Level

  • Herbert
  • Rodgers
  • Brady
  • Lamar
  • Hurts

Emerging (or Emerged and descending)

  • Tagovailoa
  • Prescott
  • Stafford
  • Carr
  • Lawrence
  • Garoppolo

Who am I missing? Flame away . . .

 

Dak is a group too low. 

1 hour ago, Behindenemylines said:

I wouldn’t say snobs, but poster is correct. If they had Josh Burrows or Mahomes could easily have been on a two or three SB run. 
 

Dak is good but I don’t believe can get you there. 
 

anyway F the Cowboys I hate them so glad they haven’t represented 

 

 

 

He is correct, but you haven't provided an alternative? Should 29 teams just go "oh well we have no chance, let's suck and hope we get an Allen, Mahomes, Burrow" ??

 

Only one of whom was a #1 pick. 

Posted
16 hours ago, H2o said:

Depending on the type of PCL sprain, Lamar should be back no later than 4 weeks. The Ravens' next 4 games? The Steelers, the Browns, the Falcons, and the Steelers. Baltimore should be fine. They close out with Cincy. He will be back by then. 

Somehow I think those Steelers games are still going to be tough and they would be with or without Jackson.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

If it was Jackson's ACL I wonder what would have happened. They would not be giving a running QB with a bum knee anything close to their previous offer. So they would probably try to tag him and maybe he holds out. I think everyone involved got lucky it's only a PCL injury. They are going to have to sign him and the longer they wait the more expensive it becomes 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...