Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, UKBillFan said:

 

We're still waiting for a fumble to bounce our way and we've gone through week thirteen.

Ha kinda true...that Brisset fumble was critical a few weeks ago.

 

But get your point.  Kc seems to get a lot of fortuitous bounces, Cincy just needs 1 stop coming up

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, UKBillFan said:

 

We're still waiting for a fumble to bounce our way and we've gone through week thirteen.

 

It sounds like we are due! Our plan is to save them up for the playoffs. It’s 4-D chess we are playing! 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Process said:

I know it wasnt a catch but Chase/Higgins combo is not fair. 

 

Bengals are blowing this

One of them will be gone soon enough. They're all on rookie contracts and Mike Brown is very much a "cash to the cap" kind of owner.

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, GoBills808 said:

This is all results oriented thinking

 

it's a very common way of looking at outcomes but leads to inefficient decision making

 

No, I've explained how even within the bot's own logic it is not a given that going for it is the right choice. What the bot actually tells us is the individual win percentage of 4 different outcomes - going for it and 1) converting or 2) failing, or kicking a FG and 3) converting or 4) failing. Everybody agrees that the FG there is basically a gimme. So using the bot's logic you're actually deciding on whether you want to accept a win probability of 65% for free, or risk ending up with a 59% win probability to try and get a 74% win probability. It is a totally valid belief that accepting the free points makes more sense than taking the risk. Whatever historical records show you don't actually know the likelihood of converting a 4th and 1 attempt in this specific moment against this specific defense. You do know that the FG try is almost 100% guaranteed.

 

Edited by HappyDays
Posted
2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

No, I've explained how even within the bot's own logic it is not a given that going for it is the right choice. What the bot actually tells us is the individual win percentage of 4 different outcomes - going for it and 1) converting or 2) failing, or kicking a FG and 3) converting or 4) failing. Everybody agrees that the FG there is basically a gimme. So using the bot's logic you're actually deciding on whether you want to accept a win probability of 65% for free, or risk ending up with a 59% win probability to try and get a 74% win probability. It is a totally valid belief that accepting the free points is making more sense than taking the risk. Whatever historical records show you don't actually know the likelihood of converting a 4th and 1 attempt in this specific moment against this specific defense. You do know that the FG try is almost 100% guaranteed.

I'm not going to argue with you, you are free to believe what you wish

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...