Jump to content

Injuries NOT an excuse. Bills tied for 5th fewest man games lost to injury thru Week 11


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Beast said:

Terrible thread.


It’s worth noting,  but doesn’t take into account the caliber of player and the fact our injuries have all been cluster types decimating position groups. 
 

Likely also doesn’t take into account a guy like Tre White just coming back now. 
 

Also, the team were chasing (KC) has 20 less games missed due to injury by starter.  Looking at our losses, give us those 20, and that likely equates to 1 of the 3 losses turned to a W.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, SCBills said:


It’s worth noting,  but doesn’t take into account the caliber of player and the fact our injuries have all been cluster types decimating position groups. 
 

Likely also doesn’t take into account a guy like Tre White just coming back now. 
 

Also, the team were chasing (KC) has 20 less games missed due to injury by starter.  Looking at our losses, give us those 20, and that likely equates to 1 of the 3 losses turned to a W.  


Just the whole “no excuse” thing pisses me off.

Edited by Beast
Posted

Allen is injured, clearly missing throws because of his injury, but plays each week because he is a dawg.  That’s not shown in the data.

 

Poyer is playing each week with a bum arm, because he is a dawg.  Missing 2-3 games this season instead of 6-8 like he should.

 

 

Davis has dealt with Ankle issues this season, but is toughing it out because he is a dawg

 

edmunds has been dealing with stuff.  Milano has been dealing with stuff.  Phillips, Oliver Rousseau etc

 

If guys sat each time they were hurt, we would be closer to 110 games honestly.  But guys know we need wins, so they are playing hurt to try to push results

  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, transient said:

How did injuries result in healthy players forgetting how to tackle?

 

Healthy rookies and backups playing just slightly out of position, late diagnosing plays and arriving late....

 

It happens more often when playing more backups and rookies than seasoned starters and why McD prefers a good ratio of veteran players.

 

Some is just players trying to do more than their 1/11th and some is poor fundamentals.

 

Still trying to wrap my mind around Frazier playing our smaller DTs in the middle near the goal line against clear Detroit run packages instead of Phillips and Jones.

 

I like Oliver and Settle as penetrating DTs on passing situations and they both had strong games, but we have some wide bodies that I think would have worked better down there.

 

We kept bleeding yards up the middle. Frazier's matchup decisions just baffle me some times.

 

 

Edited by WideNine
Posted
6 hours ago, Big Turk said:

Bills tied for 5th fewest man games lost to injury with only 83.

 

 

 

The difference? Many of them have been to key players unlike the last several years.

 

 

So the excuses the Bills are somehow more injured than every other team needs to stop. They are STILL one of the least injured teams in the NFL even with what seems like a crazy rash of injuries...we just don't see all the players out for other teams because we don't follow them very closely.

 

Injuries to non key players/starters would help as well.

So what this tells me is that except for Miami, every other team with more injuries than the Bills has a worse record than us. Maybe it is the injuries after all.

And to add to that , injuries, maybe 'explanation' is better than 'excuse', but it's the best explanation for teams underperforming or struggling in areas. If a team is missing it's starting pro bowl safeties and all pro CB, plus 1st round pick also being a qb, it makes sense that a team would struggle in that area, because of injuries.

Injuries probably have more impact on games than anything else.

 

Posted (edited)

The premise of this thread is ridiculous for the following reasons - 

 

  • As others have pointed out, you don't really need to make excuses for 8-3
  • The size of the bubble (indicating quality of player missing games) is a lot more important than just the number of games lost - losing Hyde and White for half the season or more is a lot different than losing, and in terms of teams in competition, the Bills have one of the biggest bubbles
  • The graph doesn't give any indication of players who are playing through injury (and therefore playing at a lower level than expected.)  Gabe Davis, Tremaine Edmunds, Jordan Poyer, Ed Oliver, Mitch Morse, and don't forget Josh Allen (just a few.) And again, yes, lots of players play through injuries, but it's clear to anyone watching that we seem to be a bit snakebitten this year in terms of the quality of players who are not at their best due to injury.

 

Look at the actual scenarios and games we have lost, and it is clear that multiple injuries and missing key players (and depth players behind them) have been key in at least 2 of the 3 losses.  Yes, every team loses players, not many can say they have lost as many pro bowl level players as we have and are still in competition for the #1 seed.

Edited by Captain Caveman
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

 

When you have a true franchise QB, with a bunch of injuries you will still be good.

With minimal injuries your team will be great. Let's just get healthier, get to the playoffs & let's roll.

Posted (edited)

Yeah I'm not buying this chart.  For all I know the person writing the "quality" could have the Jets losing Breece Hall having the same effect as us losing Hines.  Even if I were to believe it our bubble size would indicate injuries kind of are an "excuse."

Edited by Scott7975
Posted
6 hours ago, Ta111 said:

It’s some weird masochist complex. We should be extremely proud of what this team has accomplished. It’s basically unheard of for a team to have to travel back to the same stadium within 5 days and win both.

Not to mention it was in Detroit 1st time where they played Cleveland.

Close trip for their Dog Pound fans to get to. 

 

LA, Seattle, Arizona, Far West teams etc... aren't making that trip. Crowd noise from Browns fans played into "home" game for Bills.

Posted
7 hours ago, Big Turk said:

Bills tied for 5th fewest man games lost to injury with only 83.

 

 

 

The difference? Many of them have been to key players unlike the last several years.

 

 

So the excuses the Bills are somehow more injured than every other team needs to stop. They are STILL one of the least injured teams in the NFL even with what seems like a crazy rash of injuries...we just don't see all the players out for other teams because we don't follow them very closely.

 

Injuries to non key players/starters would help as well.

 

Total games missed by players is a pretty meaningless way to look at injuries.  If your mediocre guard is injured and replaced by another mediocre guard, it's not a big deal.  We've been missing guys like Poyer, Hyde, Milano, and White whose replacements aren't nearly as talented.   Our backups haven't played horribly all around but they have come up short in critical moments and cost us games.  


Josh hasn't missed any games yet - so is not part of the fancy chart - but his injury has clearly hurt the team.

 

 

 

Posted (edited)

Out of 11 games played, our defensive starters have missed 35 games [Tre - 10, Hyde - 9, Poyer - 4, Oliver - 3, Edmunds - 3, Rousseau - 3, Elam - 2, Cookie -1] average of 3.2 per week - only Tre was out week 1. That's 29% of your starters out every week.

 

Edited by BearNorth
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

As some have indicated before, it is not the number of injuries that a team experiences that tells the story.  It is who the injured players are that is relevant.  Losing a bunch of guys on special teams doesn't hurt a team as much as missing guys like Hyde, Poyer, Edmunds, Milano, and White.  

Posted
On 11/25/2022 at 12:52 PM, Big Turk said:

 

It's in the tweet with the bubble size. Bills have had bad luck in that regard.

Here is what that bubble chart shows. 
Of all the leading teams. KC, phi, nyc, Mia, dal, etc, Bills have the biggest bubble. Which according to the tweeter, means most injuries involving the best players. 
 

sorta what 90% of this board has been saying without the Byzantine graphics. 

Posted (edited)

The table with the bubbles is more instructive than the pure stats because it factors in the quality of the guys who have missed time and that shows that other than Baltimore none of the teams with 7 or more wins have been anything like as impacted by injuries as the Bills. The injuries and the impact of them is an "excuse" as to why the Bills are currently 8-3 and toughing out tight games rather than 10-1 and freewheeling towards the #1 seed. It says a lot for our coaching that we are 8-3 in that scenario that same as it says a lot for John Harbaugh that he always seems to keep the Ravens in the fight despite consecutive years of injury hell. 

 

12 hours ago, pennstate10 said:

Here is what that bubble chart shows. 
Of all the leading teams. KC, phi, nyc, Mia, dal, etc, Bills have the biggest bubble. Which according to the tweeter, means most injuries involving the best players. 
 

sorta what 90% of this board has been saying without the Byzantine graphics. 

 

Any only the Ravens "bubble" is even close. 

Edited by GunnerBill
  • Like (+1) 3
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...