Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

^^^^^^^^^^ showing how desperate this "investigation" is^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

 

The irony and perhaps comedy value of this entire charade is how rags like the NY Times, other media, and all the associated twits our friend here cites lots of sources that claim to have access to secret and confidential forms of evidence and communications proving the guilt of the former President, and now apparently others in some wild conspiracy. 

 

Which if true was leaked illegally by somebody and published illegally by somebody.  So you're using illegally gained confidential government information to support the arrest and conviction of somebody in possession of confidential and secret government information.  The exact same thing.  Do any of the clowns signing off on these stories realize the contradiction of the very laws they express so much concern over?

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Chris farley said:

^^^^^^^^^^ showing how desperate this "investigation" is^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

 

 

^^^^^^^^^ someone desperate for it all to go away and everyone leave Conald alone ^^^^^^^^^

 

lmao

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Do not expect this date to hold. Florida is one of the states with what’s called a “rocket docket” where cases move very quickly. That being said, this will almost certainly be pushed back due to pretrial motions. 
 

However, it is at least a good sign that Judge Cannon isn’t 100% going to screw around with the case. She still may, but at least she seems to want to keep it moving. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...