Hunter Biden's Laptop Thread

[Tiberius]

14 minutes ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

 

We don't know. GOP has not been allowed to look at it. 

We do know, the laptop was not in Hunter's possession and was in the hands of people unknown before the FBI even seized it. 

 

Tainted evidence 

[BillStime]

3 minutes ago, nedboy7 said:

This will end like Hillary’s emails. 

 

And Benghazi

 

[Tiberius]

6 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

And Benghazi

 

And Obama's birth certificate 

[BillStime]

10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

And Obama's birth certificate 

 

Don't forget about the brown suit scandal.

 

[Tiberius]

Just now, BillStime said:

 

Don't forget about the brown suit scandal.

 

OMG! Who could forget that! 🤣

[BillStime]

 

[SoCal Deek]

2 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

the oversight committee are members of Congress correct?

 

What? Have you never been on a committee at work?  Yes, they are members of congress. But their charge on the Oversight Subcommittee....is...wait for it.....OVERSIGHT!

[BillStime]

 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

1 hour ago, SoCal Deek said:

What? Have you never been on a committee at work?  Yes, they are members of congress. But their charge on the Oversight Subcommittee....is...wait for it.....OVERSIGHT!

Perfect ok… so stay with me.., while they are busy doing that activity, what are they not doing? 

[SoCal Deek]

15 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Perfect ok… so stay with me.., while they are busy doing that activity, what are they not doing? 

That SubCommittee? Hopefully they’re not writing legislation, increasing my taxes, or declaring a war somewhere. You do understand the definition of a ‘subcommittee’…. right? 

[ChiGoose]

Just now, SoCal Deek said:

That SubCommittee? Hopefully they’re not writing legislation, increasing my taxes, or declaring a war somewhere. You do understand the definition of a ‘subcommittee’…. right? 

 

I generally go against the majority of the board here, but I'm mostly with SoCal Deek here. It's oversight. I think the claims against Hunter are almost certainly overblown and used as an emotional tool to motivate the Very Online Right, but the allegation that a Senator and/or President may be benefitting from corrupt family members is exactly the kind of thing the committee exists for.

 

The real question to me is if they're going to actually try to investigate Hunter or do a Benghazi-esque show trial solely to try to harm Joe Biden.

[SoCal Deek]

1 minute ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I generally go against the majority of the board here, but I'm mostly with SoCal Deek here. It's oversight. I think the claims against Hunter are almost certainly overblown and used as an emotional tool to motivate the Very Online Right, but the allegation that a Senator and/or President may be benefitting from corrupt family members is exactly the kind of thing the committee exists for.

 

The real question to me is if they're going to actually try to investigate Hunter or do a Benghazi-esque show trial solely to try to harm Joe Biden.

Thanks Goose. I’m not sure what people want the oversight committee to …oversee? This topic seems to be exactly the kind of thing they should look into. The Republicans didn’t invent this story. It’s 100% true and literally fell into their laps through the very reckless actions of Hunter Biden. Whether it in fact leads back to the sitting President will never be known without…oversight. There are actual, live, witnesses who will testify (under oath) that it most definitely does. 
 

 

[TH3]

2 minutes ago, ChiGoose said:

 

I generally go against the majority of the board here, but I'm mostly with SoCal Deek here. It's oversight. I think the claims against Hunter are almost certainly overblown and used as an emotional tool to motivate the Very Online Right, but the allegation that a Senator and/or President may be benefitting from corrupt family members is exactly the kind of thing the committee exists for.

 

The real question to me is if they're going to actually try to investigate Hunter or do a Benghazi-esque show trial solely to try to harm Joe Biden.

All the crap the GOP is getting is deserved. If it’s a committee….why is it their headline lead? They had NO PLATFORM for 2020…The Trump GOP healthcare alternative was a FREAKING BLANK BINDER.

Americans are done the bait and switch…smoke and mirror show….until they show some actual substance…they are proven frauds

[ChiGoose]

Just now, TH3 said:

All the crap the GOP is getting is deserved. If it’s a committee….why is it their headline lead? They had NO PLATFORM for 2020…The Trump GOP healthcare alternative was a FREAKING BLANK BINDER.

Americans are done the bait and switch…smoke and mirror show….until they show some actual substance…they are proven frauds

 

Well, this is why I was happy the led with it. Probably 80%+ of Americans just do not care. And the more the GOP prioritizes it, the better for the Dems.

 

What a responsible party would have done was lead off with their inflation plan or gas prices plan while also setting up the oversight committee to look into the Hunter claims. But apparently even the GOP leadership has terminal online brain, and as we just saw with the midterms, that's very good for the Democrats (it's also why Biden won in 2020, he was the least online candidate running).

[SoCal Deek]

3 minutes ago, TH3 said:

All the crap the GOP is getting is deserved. If it’s a committee….why is it their headline lead? They had NO PLATFORM for 2020…The Trump GOP healthcare alternative was a FREAKING BLANK BINDER.

Americans are done the bait and switch…smoke and mirror show….until they show some actual substance…they are proven frauds

Oh brother. Do you live under a rock? (Sorry) Speaker McCarthy laid out (in writing) their entire agenda prior to the election. Looking into stuff like this is just one of dozen things on that agenda. 

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

24 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

That SubCommittee? Hopefully they’re not writing legislation, increasing my taxes, or declaring a war somewhere. You do understand the definition of a ‘subcommittee’…. right? 

Damn we are beck here.
 

ok… The oversight subcommittee is comprised of congresspersons that are only allowed to do oversight things or if they are not engaged in committee would they possibly be doing other lawmaker activities??

[SoCal Deek]

4 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:

Damn we are beck here.
 

ok… The oversight subcommittee is comprised of congresspersons that are only allowed to do oversight things or if they are not engaged in committee would they possibly be doing other lawmaker activities??

Geeez! Congressional members sit on multiple committees. I have no idea what is so darn complicated about that concept. This particular committee focuses solely on oversight. Have you never been on a subcommittee at work? May I ask what the heck you do for a living? 

Edited November 19, 2022 by SoCal Deek

[Over 29 years of fanhood]

29 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Geeez! Congressional members sit on multiple committees. I have no idea what is so darn complicated about that concept. This particular committee focuses solely on oversight. Have you never been on a subcommittee at work? May I ask what the heck you do for a living? 

for one challenge people that are full of *****

 

 I said better they spend time manning that pointless oversight committee over plotting to steal more of my money… but somehow you suggested it is an impossibility that the individuals manning the committee might also otherwise engage in legislating new tax law with their time.

[Doc]

It was confirmed to be authentic the second Idiot Boy couldn't even deny it was his in that interview last year.

[Tiberius]

3 minutes ago, Doc said:

It was confirmed to be authentic the second Idiot Boy couldn't even deny it was his in that interview last year.

Chain of custody was compromised. That's when the Russians planted material on it