Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bangarang said:

The flip flopping this place has with PFF is hilarious. 

Pretty sure I haven't ever mentioned PFF before. Just watching the game, it was pretty obvious he was playing a damn good game.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 5
Posted
1 minute ago, 2003Contenders said:

I do not put a lot of faith in PFF, but is undeniable that Edmunds' absence was greatly felt in the 2nd half.

 

We need some groin magic.  

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

PFF grade or no, I have done a total 180 on Edmunds this year and now want us to re-sign him. The defense clearly looks different without him. He's stopped making some of the head scratching plays. I don't mind that he doesn't make game changing turnovers, I'll take the consistency.

  • Like (+1) 6
  • Agree 10
Posted
12 minutes ago, HoofHearted said:

Also with Edmunds... 😄

Good play has warranted it, maybe he always has been steady. This year it has been pretty obvious though. 
i do get tired of watching him piggy back runners for 6-8 yards though. It happens still too. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

PFF grade or no, I have done a total 180 on Edmunds this year and now want us to re-sign him. The defense clearly looks different without him. He's stopped making some of the head scratching plays. I don't mind that he doesn't make game changing turnovers, I'll take the consistency.

I completely agree. Even at the start of the season, I didn't want him re-signed. Now, I don't know how we don't. 

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

PFF grade or no, I have done a total 180 on Edmunds this year and now want us to re-sign him. The defense clearly looks different without him. He's stopped making some of the head scratching plays. I don't mind that he doesn't make game changing turnovers, I'll take the consistency.

I was at the game and focused on him throughout. He was phenomenal on Sunday. Just amazing, particularly in coverage. When he went down, the D went south. He's an imposing threat in coverage. Is he as good as a CB? No, but he's certainly among the elite for coverage among LBs. 

Edited by dave mcbride
  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

PFF grade or no, I have done a total 180 on Edmunds this year and now want us to re-sign him. The defense clearly looks different without him. He's stopped making some of the head scratching plays. I don't mind that he doesn't make game changing turnovers, I'll take the consistency.

Body of work of this year has been pretty good. He has some massive PBU’s and some good tackles.

 

It’s actually a shame that he’s closer to the top end of player that teams let walk. May end up being a situation where he’s gonna get too much as a FA

Posted

A guy that played for 1 half and dropped an easy INT was the best defender in the league ? Color me skeptical 

 

I thought he had a decent game. Couple nice pass breakups and generally a good job in coverage. He did drop that INT though. 

 

I'm not buying the narrative that the DEF did so much worse with Edmunds out. 

 

Vikings offense scored 10 points in the 1st half (Edmunds playing).

Vikings offense scored 13 points in the 2nd half (Edmunds not playing). 

 

And as far as a sample size of our DEF playing with or without Edmunds. The only game he missed this year was against the Steelers. I don't think we missed him that game. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, DabillsDaBillsDaBills said:

A guy that played for 1 half and dropped an easy INT was the best defender in the league ? Color me skeptical 

 

I thought he had a decent game. Couple nice pass breakups and generally a good job in coverage. He did drop that INT though. 

 

I'm not buying the narrative that the DEF did so much worse with Edmunds out. 

 

Vikings offense scored 10 points in the 1st half (Edmunds playing).

Vikings offense scored 13 points in the 2nd half (Edmunds not playing). 

 

And as far as a sample size of our DEF playing with or without Edmunds. The only game he missed this year was against the Steelers. I don't think we missed him that game. 

If you were at the game and focusing on what was going on in the secondary, you'd realize how much of a threat he presents. He is very fast for a LB, extremely tall, and has an incredibly big wingspan. And he was playing with anticipation on virtually every play. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...