Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, HappyDays said:

Here's Patrick Peterson breaking it down:

 

We have a big problem if opposing defenses know exactly what route we're going to run and where Allen will throw the ball based on the coverage.

 

He basically says that Davis only runs a couple routes and pretty much always runs inside post in the red zone. That makes it way too easy for a veteran DB to make a play on the ball. Dorsey needs to add some red zone wrinkles, fast. We've been figured out.

What a clown. He made a play on a very poorly thrown ball or a bad miscommunication between QB and WR and he’s making it out like he’s genius. I think we can all agree if Gabe cuts in Peterson is beat, if Allen throws deeper Peterson is beat. Guy got lucky

 

If he was banking on Gabe making the wrong read I’d have to say he is a genius though. 

Edited by BananaB
Posted
12 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

 

do you think this is a Bills thing? what do you think film study is all about?

 

this is literally what football is.

 

Most #2 WRs don't have just a couple routes that defenses can key in on. Most top tier offenses have wrinkles they put into their red zone play calls. It's hard enough to make plays happen in the compressed area of the field without defenses also knowing exactly what you want to do. Considering how poor our red zone offense has been this year (currently 21st in red zone TD% with 52.94%) I'm not going to chalk it up to just regular film study. It's too predictable and uncreative right now.

  • Agree 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

 

do you think this is a Bills thing? what do you think film study is all about?

 

this is literally what football is.

Right.  Every team has tendencies, and good opponents know hat those tendencies are.  One of the things that has made Andy Reid a success is that he always seems to have some plays that go against the tendencies.

 

The problem was not that Patrick Peterson knew that the Bills like going to Davis over the middle in the end zone.  The problem was that Allen didn't know, or forgot, that Peterson would know that.  That's a problem with Allen and with Dorsey.  The Seahawks lost the Super Bowl to the Patriots because they didn't seem to understand that the Patriots would know they liked that little slant pass on the goal line.  

 

Ultimately, it's McDermott's problem.  His job is to be sure the coaches and players are doing their jobs.   And right now, his coaches and players aren't getting it done, which means McDermott's not getting it done. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

How do you explain the other throws basically right to defenders?

 

He hasn’t been the same since the 2nd half of the GB game.  Not sure what’s up with him but there’s something not right. He doesn’t look like the same player we’ve all seen!

Edited by PayDaBill$
Posted

Allen is trying to do too much.  plain and simple. There was no reason to throw that ball into the endzone in the middle of the field in OT.  Too risky.  or throwing passes into crowds of players in the red zone. There’s situations where ball security is the most important thing. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, PayDaBill$ said:

How do you explain the other throws basically right to defenders?

 

He hasn’t been the same since the 2nd half of the GB game.  Not sure what’s up with him but there’s something not right. He doesn’t look like the same player we’ve all seen!

He completed 29 passes on Sunday and had 3 drops with about 3 passes he threw in the dirt. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, PayDaBill$ said:

How do you explain the other throws basically right to defenders?

 

He hasn’t been the same since the 2nd half of the GB game.  Not sure what’s up with him but there’s something not right. He doesn’t look like the same player we’ve all seen!

He's been reckless with the ball all year.  It's not just the last few games.  He has streaks of being the best QB in the league by far and then puts the ball in harms way seemingly out of nowhere.  He's been especially careless inside the 20's which kills you either way.  This is worse than his fumbling earlier in his career, but just as he cleaned that up, I suspect he will clean up the INTs too.  He just needs a couple of 225 yard 1 TD 0 INT games.  Less hero ball. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, TwistofFate said:

Found this on Twitter today, it's the final throw of the game from Allen's perspective.  

 

The decision looked good, the pass looked late and off target. 

 

 

 

Now that I have watched that clip 75 times, its almost like the linebacker making this way across the field from left to right may have obscured how close Peterson was in pursuit.  It makes sense based on where Josh throws that ball.  I'm just having a hard time believing Josh is that careless.  I think the LB coming over distracted him just enough.  We can see it clear as day, but from Josh's POV on the field I think this is the case.  Just lucky LB placement?

 

Ah, just so hard to watch!

Edited by B-Large
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Scott7975 said:

 

At the time Josh Allen started that throw, Singletary wasnt even past the LoS yet because he helped on a block.

 

FhkOKoKXkAAtbce?format=jpg&name=large

 

 

 

But as you can see, he has a clean pocket.  He didn't need to rush the throw.  He should know Singletary should leak out eventually.

 

His throw is a throw you make if there's like 20 seconds left to play and no timeouts.  We had time.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 5
Posted
2 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

But as you can see, he has a clean pocket.  He didn't need to rush the throw.  He should know Singletary should leak out eventually.

 

His throw is a throw you make if there's like 20 seconds left to play and no timeouts.  We had time.

Nice post & well said 

Posted
4 hours ago, HappyDays said:

 

The ball that hit Knox in the hands in the end zone was ridiculously over aggressive?


It wasn’t a bad ball but just combined with what seemed to be a general thought process of taking end zone shots on every down seems over aggressive. I guess in hindsight is what I’m saying.

 

Seemed like that was the plan.

Posted
9 hours ago, HoofHearted said:

It’s not backyard ball. You can’t just make stuff up on the fly. The concept was double post. Gabe ran a post. It’s okay to admit Josh threw a bad ball.

Receivers make adjustments on routes all the time that may or may not be exactly what is called.  It only works if the qb knows its coming based on both players reading the same thing.  

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

But as you can see, he has a clean pocket.  He didn't need to rush the throw.  He should know Singletary should leak out eventually.

 

His throw is a throw you make if there's like 20 seconds left to play and no timeouts.  We had time.

 

Allen made a bad throw and possibly a bad decision but football doesnt work like that.  He goes through reads and there are windows to throw.  He saw something and threw it.  QBs dont just wait around. These are split second decisions they are making because thats all they have.

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

That pass so underthrown that it has me wondering whether the UCL is bothering him more than they’re letting on.

 

Carson Palmer said that with his UCL injury, 2 of every 3 passes were normal, but that 3rd pass, it was like it was shot out of the sky - absolutely no velocity on it.

 

That play reminded me of Palmers comments. That pass was not even close to being completed. He underthew that by a good 5 yards. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, CoudyBills said:

Receivers make adjustments on routes all the time that may or may not be exactly what is called.  It only works if the qb knows its coming based on both players reading the same thing.  

 

Sure, choice routes. Read one defender and the route adjusts based on what they do. There's nothing on the double post that would adjust that route. Choice routes are designed to take advantage of leverages and cushions and put you in the best possible position based on what the defense is doing. Vikings were playing split coverage - Quarters to the boundary and Two to the field. Safety going with the Post by #2 clears the window for the Post by #1 behind it with the corner playing outside leverage. There is nothing that should change Davis from running his Post there.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
11 hours ago, DaggersEOD said:

To me, this was a telegraphed play by the Bills that the Vikes were expecting and ready for. They knew this pass was coming. 
 

IMO the play call was the problem and not going to the 2nd/3rd reads sealed the deal. 

 

If I remember right, they had run a really similar follow concept on the failed 4th and 2 not that long ago.

Similar double clutch, similar late(ish) ball; the reason it probably wasn't picked was because it was low and short of the goalline.

Posted
5 hours ago, BullBuchanan said:

It's both a bad throw and a bad decision. Josh is trowing directly into the strength of what appears to be Cover 4. Could he make it? Sure, but this is a game about percentages and this defense is designed specifically to make this a low percentage throw. Against lesser QBs it would be practically impossible, but because Josh is Josh he says ***** you and throws it anyway. This time even he's not good enough to beat the stacked odds against him.

Cover 4 opens up the underneath routes which he had in a wide open Singletary.

This is not new behavior from Josh. He's done it his whole career and I posted a video from Brett Kollman about how the Dolphins figured him our last year, but just didn't have the talent to beat him. Now they do and apparently a lot of the league has the same playbook. If Josh doesn't adapt, this will keep happening. He can't fix it with better throws. He has to put his ego aside and take what the defense gives. It's then up to Dorsey to figure out ways to get Josh what he wants by countering the defense.

 

Double Post is a Quarters beater. They had the perfect concept dialed up for the coverage they got. Josh just threw a dud.

Posted

It was obviously both a bad decision and bad throw, but what type of call was that with crossers running into a collapsing net of defenders. Naturally you’re directing an aggressive young QB into a high risk, low percentage game destroying throw. Why not throw an underneath, high percentage throw and keep moving the ball towards the goal line until they stop it. The OC has to protect Josh from himself.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...