Jump to content

The 4th & 2 playcalling


Success

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

That is OPEN in the NFL.     Catch ball,  get a yard in open space against a single defender.    Tom Brady 101.    I didn't need to see the replay..........IRT it was obviously the way to convert that 1st down from my excellent vantage point on the Bills sideline side of field.    When it's that short of a conversion you have to be willing to look short to long.    Josh has developed a Rob Johnson-esque addiction of looking long first even when it's unnecessary.

Don’t disagree, but you and I both know that Allen ain’t throwing a swing pass to Duke Freaking Johnson on a 4th down play form the five. Christ, he’s not even in Allen’s range of vision given the way he set up. That’s not a good thing, but it is also true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

Look at the yard markers. First down is at the 5. Duke is at the 9. Defender is at the 2.

 

The defender was closer to the first down marker than Duke was. The angle of the camera is throwing you off. It would have been very close.

 

 

If our defense left a RB that open in the flat on a short conversion play...........are you expecting that defender to drop that RB for no gain in open space?

 

I think not.

 

Instead we are complaining about a defender not being anywhere near close enough to even contest the throw.     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my. The 2nd and 3rd down plays were dreadful. This has been a pattern - so many just throw away plays. The 2nd down one had no chance and not sure what they were even trying to do, not sure the players did either. Then on 3rd all Davis has to do is keep his route going and instead he stops right next to the defender. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Awwufelloff said:

Why didn't we take the 3 pts? What is going on with these coaching decisions....?

No idea. 
 

2nd-2 and we got zero yards the next three plays. 
 

And the kicker is Josh converted a 3rd-15 and a 3rd-16 and we got nothing on this drive. 
 

Edited by Straight Hucklebuck
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

If our defense left a RB that open in the flat on a short conversion play...........are you expecting that defender to drop that RB for no gain in open space?

 

I think not.

 

Instead we are complaining about a defender not being anywhere near close enough to even contest the throw.     

 

I said he might have gotten the first, but it’s definitely not a given. The defender is closer to the marker than Duke is. It would have been close. And that’s assuming Duke makes the catch after the defender pops him. Cook dropped a very similar pass last week due to being hit as he was catching it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Motorin' said:

 

Duke was wide open for a quick 2 yards in the flat to the left right away.

 

Josh could have also scrambled to his left, probably for a TD, just  before he ran to his right...

 

But why couldn't we run the ball for the 1st down on 2nd and 2, or 3rd and 2?

 

 

 

We could have run or passed for 2 yards on second, third, or even fourth down.  But for some reason we don't take what is there.  Is Dorsey telling him to go for 6 at all costs, or is it Allen?   It is low percentage losing football.  

 

One of many tactical errors that we keep seeing the past few weeks.  

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roundybout said:

The series that confirmed to me that Dorsey ain't it. Sorry, but a proper OC would never call something like that with two yards to go. Power sweep with Cook or even Josh gets it. 

Or even that Stampede play we do where we pull a bunch of linemen and Josh runs a sweep.  

 

I don't think it's ever been completely stopped...

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Success said:

I hate to belabor this one - but it was genuinely concerning.

 

We can set aside the decision to go for it for now, which I disagreed with.  But it wasn't THAT crazy, given the talent on our offense.

 

The sequence there from 2nd down on was as unimaginative as anything I've seen.  It was almost like we'd call it in a pick-up game.  Everybody go out, and try to get open!  Am I missing anything there?  Was there anything set up on any of those 3 downs that was more than Allen dropping back and surveying the field?

 

Great teams always seem to have some play in their back pocket - a "gotta have" play, when you have short yardage & a chance to put the game away.  Do we not have that?

 

What about the 3rd and 1 after a turnover and we take a 10 yrd sack?  Big miss there as well.  How about a run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bills do not execute in these types of situations especially in close games. They get bitten by short down and distances consistently. The play calling is questionable, the OL never gains leverage in short yardage, and Allen presses.

 

I hope the team’s “analytics” takes into account the Bills own failures and not strictly league-wide macro averages.

Edited by Airseven
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaggersEOD said:

Or even that Stampede play we do where we pull a bunch of linemen and Josh runs a sweep.  

 

I don't think it's ever been completely stopped...

 

It has a couple times, but the other team has to completely sell out, and the Vikings were dealing with injuries to Smith by that point. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Wayne Cubed said:

RIght, he shows Josh he's open... Josh still throws the ball in the dirt and Davis does sit in those pockets, so it's not unlike something Davis would do. Even if Davis kept runnign the throw from Allen as no where near him. It was low and in the dirt.

 

I don't know who read the play correctly. But there is space in front of Davis to keep running and instead he sits. This caused Allen to double clutch and the play died. There was a similar issue on the game ending interception. Allen has not been on the same page with his WRs too many times this year. It's my main issue with our offensive system going back to Daboll - it relies too much on Allen and the WR seeing the coverage the same way, and if they don't it is far too likely to lead to a goofy looking interception.

 

When you watch Miami's or San Fran's offense there isn't anything like that. Everyone is on the same page from pre- to post-snap. The QB just has to follow his progressions and hit his WR at the right spot on their route. It's almost certainly too late to completely change our offensive system but Dorsey has to work with Allen and the WRs to minimize these critical mistakes. Allen and Davis have been together for too long for these kinds of issues to still be popping up.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fan_in_tx said:

What about the 3rd and 1 after a turnover and we take a 10 yrd sack?  Big miss there as well.  How about a run?

Easy to say run, looking back.  Note than on 2nd and 1, a play earlier, singletary was stuffed for no gain, so that may have dissuaded the run option

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HappyDays said:

 

I don't know who read the play correctly. But there is space in front of Davis to keep running and instead he sits. This caused Allen to double clutch and the play died. There was a similar issue on the game ending interception. Allen has not been on the same page with his WRs too many times this year. It's my main issue with our offensive system going back to Daboll - it relies too much on Allen and the WR seeing the coverage the same way, and if they don't it is far too likely to lead to a goofy looking interception.

 

When you watch Miami's or San Fran's offense there isn't anything like that. Everyone is on the same page from pre- to post-snap. The QB just has to follow his progressions and hit his WR at the right spot on their route. It's almost certainly too late to completely change our offensive system but Dorsey has to work with Allen and the WRs to minimize these critical mistakes. Allen and Davis have been together for too long for these kinds of issues to still be popping up.

 

I agree with everything you're saying, but I feel like this problem (Josh and receivers not on same page) was not a problem until the 2nd half of the Green Bay game and it's continued since then.

 

I feel like he was in sync with all receiving options earlier in the season.

 

Even early in yesterday's game, he was spreading the ball around nicely and things looked "normal" again.  Then the wheels came off ... again.

 

There's got to be an explanation but I sure as ***** don't have it.

 

What is equally concerning is that Morse and Allen are STILL having under-center exchanges.  How a veteran Center and QB can't get THAT down, of all things, boggles my ***** brain.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

 

I don't know who read the play correctly. But there is space in front of Davis to keep running and instead he sits. This caused Allen to double clutch and the play died. There was a similar issue on the game ending interception. Allen has not been on the same page with his WRs too many times this year. It's my main issue with our offensive system going back to Daboll - it relies too much on Allen and the WR seeing the coverage the same way, and if they don't it is far too likely to lead to a goofy looking interception.

 

When you watch Miami's or San Fran's offense there isn't anything like that. Everyone is on the same page from pre- to post-snap. The QB just has to follow his progressions and hit his WR at the right spot on their route. It's almost certainly too late to completely change our offensive system but Dorsey has to work with Allen and the WRs to minimize these critical mistakes. Allen and Davis have been together for too long for these kinds of issues to still be popping up.

 

I know there is space there but Allen throws the ball behind Davis anyways. To be honest they've actually run this play a few times this season and they haven't gotten it right yet. It's a Follow Concepts route. One time Josh nearly got Crowder killed, the other was to Moss and had no gain. I'd say they got that one pretty close to correct and Josh missed it being late but then he missed it being late on another attempt.

 

I say all this but I honestly don't know what the Bills offense is good at at this moment. I can't think of one play they can run, besides something involving Josh improving, where when they need to get it, they get it. It's a lot of option routes by the receivers as well which is good but then where are the excuted plays? We know they can't execute in short yardage.

Edited by Wayne Cubed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

Yeah that wasn’t on Gabe at all.

 

Allen just threw a bad ball.

 

DCBEFF2-F-EFF6-4-BCB-8-BAB-C1-A2-FFD0-B1

 

Quite apart from throws that represent bad decisions Josh has in this funk also thrown some bad balls. As others have pointed out, his receivers bailed him out a number of times yesterday with good catches on balls that were poorly thrown. One wonders if Josh is experiencing again the mechanical issues that impacted his accuracy before they were resolved. It happens. Some years ago Aaron Rodgers (when indisputably in his prime) got into a funk and had a stretch of. 3-4 games where his game fell apart. Turns out he too has to manage his mechanics because of unhelpful tendencies he can fall into. He got through them working with his then QB coach N. Hackett and turned things around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...