Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sure hope McCarthy isn't really going to cut defense spending like its reported he has agreed to 

 

A dangerous world requires a strong US military 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
46 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Sure hope McCarthy isn't really going to cut defense spending like its reported he has agreed to 

 

A dangerous world requires a strong US military 


Something something Ukraine something something Jewish Space Lasers blah blah

 

imagine if the Dems considered cutting the military budget! All the gravy SEAL, “back da blue” chuds out there would be screeching. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
23 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Sure hope McCarthy isn't really going to cut defense spending like its reported he has agreed to 

 

A dangerous world requires a strong US military 

Do you know our defense spending is more than the entire world’s defense spending- COMBINED?!?!

 

Do you know that BILLIONS of dollars go missing at the Pentagon every year?

 

I am for a strong military too, but I also think we can deal with defense budget cuts…👍

13 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

And as a reminder:

 

Pelosi, Democrats eject Marjorie Taylor Greene from House committees.

 

https://nypost.com/2021/02/04/pelosi-democrats-eject-marjorie-taylor-greene-from-house-committees/

 

 

As with Harry Reid and the filibuster, why do Democrats think the rules they change won’t apply to them when they’re the party out of power?

 

 

 

.

Because they base their decisions on emotion instead of logic… they are blinded by their passions of the moment…😉

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
On 1/9/2023 at 10:59 AM, Tiberius said:

Sure hope McCarthy isn't really going to cut defense spending like its reported he has agreed to 

 

A dangerous world requires a strong US military 

A strong military up to a point. If our fighting men and women won’t get the miracle covid vaccine then we will just have to make do with a lesser military. Putin wins. Sad. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:

A strong military up to a point. If our fighting men and women won’t get the miracle covid vaccine then we will just have to make do with a lesser military. Putin wins. Sad. 

You do realize that Putin is not even our biggest adversary, right?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Doc said:

Show TF up and do your jobs.  Wear a mask if it makes you feel better.

And if you watched, virtually EVERY SINGLE ONE of these people sat there shoulder to shoulder, day and night voting for Speaker with nary a mask donned in the entire room! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
On 1/10/2023 at 11:21 AM, JDHillFan said:

A strong military up to a point. If our fighting men and women won’t get the miracle covid vaccine then we will just have to make do with a lesser military. Putin wins. Sad. 

The US spends about 12x more annually than Russia on military spending and has about 750 overseas military bases.  While some wish to believe this deployment and projection of power is an altruistic venture to protect freedom and democracy everywhere its simply how empires have operated throughout history to control the provinces and vassal states.

 

Reality is the US operates as a global empire that provides certain perks and privileges to its citizens, at the expense of other nations and peoples, that we all benefit from it in one way or another, either through cooperation, submission, or force.  It's something most Americans are either oblivious to or don't want to accept.  Because to accept this truth is to admit their ideals and beliefs are false.  Like it or not we're all privileged citizens of the empire that rules the world.

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

New rules in the House worry Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries

 

Oh, the horror.

 

  • Requiring each bill to deal with a single subject instead of being loaded with irrelevant stuff. Proposed legislation should be a reasonable length and understandable. Seems rather uncontroversial, right?

 

  • Requiring 72 hours to read the bill before a vote. What a concept, learning what is in a bill before they vote. I bet Nancy isn’t a fan!

 

  • Allowing members of both parties to introduce amendments from the floor instead of having a dictatorial Speaker like Pelosi control things from the top-down.

 

  • A committee to investigate alleged wrongdoings at the Department of Justice. Isn’t it important to investigate the FBI and other agencies who have clearly spent the last several years interfering in elections and stifling free speech? Seems like transparency and accountability shouldn’t be a lot to ask of our electeds and our bureaucrats.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/01/new_rules_in_the_house_worry_democrat_leader_hakeem_jeffries.html

Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

 

 

New rules in the House worry Democrat leader Hakeem Jeffries

 

Oh, the horror.

 

  • Requiring each bill to deal with a single subject instead of being loaded with irrelevant stuff. Proposed legislation should be a reasonable length and understandable. Seems rather uncontroversial, right?

 

  • Requiring 72 hours to read the bill before a vote. What a concept, learning what is in a bill before they vote. I bet Nancy isn’t a fan!

 

  • Allowing members of both parties to introduce amendments from the floor instead of having a dictatorial Speaker like Pelosi control things from the top-down.

 

  • A committee to investigate alleged wrongdoings at the Department of Justice. Isn’t it important to investigate the FBI and other agencies who have clearly spent the last several years interfering in elections and stifling free speech? Seems like transparency and accountability shouldn’t be a lot to ask of our electeds and our bureaucrats.

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/01/new_rules_in_the_house_worry_democrat_leader_hakeem_jeffries.html

 

...good.

×
×
  • Create New...