Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
15 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

Who in this team outside of Josh Allen couldn't be replaced?

 

Stefon Diggs?

 

I can't come up with too many other names, and that's troubling. I'm starting to look at beane and McDermott like I do James Franklin. That is to say, they're guys who were able to resurrect a dead program, but I'm afraid they're incapable of actually elevating the program to the pinnacle.

 

Can you name any other players on the roster who aren't easily replaceable? 

Dion Dawkins, yes he drew a penalty late (has anyone seen it yet?) but he's been a quietly above average LT. 

Posted
Just now, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

You're missing the point. I'm saying beane and McDermott have done a pretty meh job of talent evaluation, especially in the past 3 drafts.

You’re missing the point. They haven’t and every standard metric to evaluate drafts prove that. There is a reason the Giants went into the Bills staff to build theirs. 

Posted
1 minute ago, The Jokeman said:

Dion Dawkins, yes he drew a penalty late (has anyone seen it yet?) but he's been a quietly above average LT. 

Yes, yes above average. But he's not the best player on the ol. Mitch Morse is. Now there's a guy o forgot.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

Who in this team outside of Josh Allen couldn't be replaced?

 

Stefon Diggs?

 

I can't come up with too many other names, and that's troubling. I'm starting to look at beane and McDermott like I do James Franklin. That is to say, they're guys who were able to resurrect a dead program, but I'm afraid they're incapable of actually elevating the program to the pinnacle.

 

Can you name any other players on the roster who aren't easily replaceable? 

 

Grab the inactives yesterday and you'll find a few that may have made the difference.

Posted
3 minutes ago, MAJBobby said:

You’re missing the point. They haven’t and every standard metric to evaluate drafts prove that. There is a reason the Giants went into the Bills staff to build theirs. 

I've acknowledged their success in reviving a dead franchise. What I doubt is their ability to finish the job 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

Who in this team outside of Josh Allen couldn't be replaced?

 

Stefon Diggs?

 

I can't come up with too many other names, and that's troubling. I'm starting to look at beane and McDermott like I do James Franklin. That is to say, they're guys who were able to resurrect a dead program, but I'm afraid they're incapable of actually elevating the program to the pinnacle.

 

Can you name any other players on the roster who aren't easily replaceable? 

Jesus Christ

Posted
2 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

I've acknowledged their success in reviving a dead franchise. What I doubt is their ability to finish the job 

Cool with Zero evidence to back it up. Only these mythical takes on how easy replacing top 10 talent is. 
 

man’s some mythical take about talent evaluation 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

Disagree 2,3,4. Can maybe see a case for 1,5. But the only one I'll solidly agree on is tre white 

 

Bills are tied for the best record in the conference without him.  He can't be on the list.

 

Dawkins???  come on...

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

Bills are tied for the best record in the conference without him.  He can't be on the list.

 

Dawkins???  come on...

Is Dawkins the best player on the OL?

Edited by Pine Barrens Mafia
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

When did He sign?

 

You need to relax. We lost a game. We are 6-2. You're saying Beane and McDermott can't elevate a team to the pinnacle yet there are 9 games left and plenty of time to correct mistakes. The Chiefs lost to the Colts and didn't play well against the Titans last night. We still have the head to head against all other afc division leaders, we control our own fate. This site is unbearable after losses. How dumb will you look if we win 13 games and get the 1 seed?

 

Edited by Buffalo03
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo03 said:

You need to relax. We lost a game. We are 6-2. You're saying Beane and McDermott can't elevate a team to the pinnacle yet there are 9 games left and plenty of time to correct mistakes. The Chiefs lost to the Colts and didn't play well against the Titans last night. We still have the head to head against all other afc division winners, we control our own fate. This site is unbearable after losses. How dumb will you look if we win 13 games and get the 1 seed?

 

I'll eat the crow if needed.

 

But I'm not concerned that I'll have to at this moment.

 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

Is Dawkins the best player on the OL?

Morse then Dawkins. 
 

both are not easily replaceable like you said. 

1 minute ago, Pine Barrens Mafia said:

I'll eat the crow if needed.

 

But I'm not concerned that I'll have to at this moment.

 

Wel of course you are not. You are on your troll account. That disappears after wins. 

Edited by MAJBobby
Posted
1 hour ago, MAJBobby said:

So you think you can easily replace to 10 Safety, LBer and DT. Really that is your take. 


They’re not easily replaced, but I interpreted the question as who severely hurts our ability to win a SB. 
 

We lost Tre last year, and many would have said him, but we were a coaching/execution meltdown away from probably winning it all. 
 

To me, it’s Allen, Diggs and Von.   That’s it. 
 

Others make it more difficult, but those three are irreplaceable. 
 

Similar to the Chiefs, where it’s Mahomes, Kelce and Jones. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, SCBills said:


They’re not easily replaced, but I interpreted the question as who severely hurts our ability to win a SB. 
 

We lost Tre last year, and many would have said him, but we were a coaching/execution meltdown away from probably winning it all. 
 

To me, it’s Allen, Diggs and Von.   That’s it. 
 

Others make it more difficult, but those three are irreplaceable. 
 

Similar to the Chiefs, where it’s Mahomes, Kelce and Jones. 

Well if that was the question I would agree. As most teams really only have that core 3. 
 

but that isn’t what the OP is saying either. 

Posted
1 hour ago, MAJBobby said:

You should. Because he is. 

Have they?  I seem to see safeties getting beat a ton and the secondary being out of position a lot with no Hyde. 
 

Ed Oliver is a top 10DT

 

a LBer that plays balls out every play is gonna get nicked. It is football. 

I don't know - Oliver seemed invisible yesterday.

  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...