Jump to content

On to Minnesota (get this game in the rear view mirror!)


Chandler#81

Recommended Posts

So sick of injury reports that read like a goddamn novel. I'm at a point where I really am starting to not care about the rest of the regular season. Don't care about Josh mvp. Don't care about the one seed. Don't care about the division. Just get to the playoffs. And wake me up in January when hopefully the best player in the league will be healthy, and anything can happen. 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I'm not usually negative Nancy, but if keenum starts, I expect the bills to lose by 14. I watched enough of keenum with a fairly talented Browns team to know he's not that good. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I'm not even gonna get pumped up for this game if keenum starts. Not sure what others have seen from him that makes them think he can be good. He had one good season in Minnesota 5 years ago

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Steptide said:

Sorry, I'm not usually negative Nancy, but if keenum starts, I expect the bills to lose by 14. I watched enough of keenum with a fairly talented Browns team to know he's not that good. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I'm not even gonna get pumped up for this game if keenum starts. Not sure what others have seen from him that makes them think he can be good. He had one good season in Minnesota 5 years ago

the vikings needed a last second FG to beat Andy FREAKING dalton, they beat a bridewater led fins team by one score, and then had to come back from 17-7 last week in the 4th to yet another backup qb in washington. not to mention they beat the bears by just one score when fields was playing like steaming dog crap...chill man.... keenum went 2-0 last year, completing 65% of his passes for 3td and just 1 int. this game is dicey but plenty winnable with keenum under center.

Edited by Stank_Nasty
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Stank_Nasty said:

the vikings needed a last second FG to beat Andy FREAKING dalton, they beat a bridewater led fins team by one score, and then had to come back from 17-7 last week in the 4th to yet another backup qb in washington. not to mention they beat the bears by just one score when fields was playing like steaming dog crap...chill man.... keenum went 2-0 last year, completing 65% of his passes for 3td and just 1 int. this game is dicey but plenty winnable with keenum under center.

I hope you're right. Obviously I want the bills to win regardless who starts. Games like last week give me huge pause though. We saw this last year too though (bad losses) and the bills bounced back so 🤷

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, RunTheBall said:

Any injury to Josh’s throwing arm is a potential disaster. In my struggle to find anything positive out of the disgusting last 6 quarters, it’s that if Josh can play, maybe he and Dorsey will be forced to emphasize the short game more. Josh has been forcing it for 6 quarters. He’s giving up the easy short stuff again for tight window throws on bracketed receivers further down the field. If he can play, I don’t think the game plan will be constant downfield throws. Heck, Dorsey may even be forced to run the ball a little. I’ll say it again, this team needs an effective running game to go far in the playoffs. They abandon it too quickly and IDK if that’s Josh switching up the plays or Dorsey being pass happy. The O needs to be fixed quick and that includes putting receivers on the field who actually catch the damn ball. I’m getting sick of Davis dropping balls that a competent #2 would catch. I love his potential but I hate that he has a breakout game then disappears for 3-4 games then pops up again.

 

I find myself in strong agreement here. 

 

One point: you say "maybe he and Dorsey will be forced to emphasize the short game more", and then correctly note that Josh has been passing over (pun intended) the open short/intermediate receivers for well-covered throws to Diggs or Davis downfield. 

 

I'm not sure how much of that is Dorsey and how much of that is Josh.

 

In Dorsey's presser, he made a point, several times in several ways, about distributing the ball to different receivers.  Yeah, he did the statutory McDermott "got to put the players in better positions to succeed" thing but, off the top of my head, Dorsey said:

-said he looks first at how many receivers had multiple receptions because the offense works better when the ball is distributed to multiple players

-said he emphasizes to Josh once the play is called, look at the reads and progressions and go where they take you, don't focus on one guy

-said a second time that "we need to make sure we're distributing the ball"

 

In McDermott's presser right after the loss, he was asked whether the lack of production behind Diggs worried him, and he said something to the effect of I'll have to look at the tape.  Today he spoke several times about distributing the ball, "you keep people engaged that way" etc.

 

After the loss Josh said "when you have a guy like Stef you have to find more ways to get him the ball" which, given that Diggs already has more than 2x the targets of anyone else.....left me with the feeling that just perhaps, Dorsey and McDermott and Josh are not on the same page about "distributing the ball".  Ultimately of course, if we distribute the ball to other open receivers (who I think are there on most plays) and stay on the field, it would result in more opportunities for Diggs as some of the defensive attention would have to come off him and we'd have more plays overall.

 

As far as Davis....Josh isn't helping his catch % by giving him these deep balls into tight coverage, but Davis is not making catches he could/should make in other contexts.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Steptide said:

Sorry, I'm not usually negative Nancy, but if keenum starts, I expect the bills to lose by 14. I watched enough of keenum with a fairly talented Browns team to know he's not that good. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I'm not even gonna get pumped up for this game if keenum starts. Not sure what others have seen from him that makes them think he can be good. He had one good season in Minnesota 5 years ago

You’re not wrong. Keenum isn’t going to put the team on his shoulders and win games. But I do have faith he can do the little things and hit some open receivers and check downs. Buffalo has some run after catch potential. It’ll need to be a full team effort to make him effective. Dorsey will need some more creativity as well. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

I have a feeling that Josh trusts Diggs but that’s it. He’ll throw to the likes of Davis, McKenzie, Shakir and Knox if they’re there but they’re not his preferred option. Maybe the interceptions have re-enforced that in his mind.

 

I dont really agree here; We just don't have a true # 2. We don't have a true # 2 OR a "big catch" slot guy like beeasley or welker.

 

The point is Josh just isn't taking the checkdowns...like ever... Brown was talking about this today, was just plain greedy all the time. It was like 2nd year Josh.

 

He's had a few games hitting 8 different recievers...

 

IMO we need to get back to basics like we did following the 2nd half of Tampa last year....more screens , check downs, and running. The big shots will come.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Steptide said:

Sorry, I'm not usually negative Nancy, but if keenum starts, I expect the bills to lose by 14. I watched enough of keenum with a fairly talented Browns team to know he's not that good. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I'm not even gonna get pumped up for this game if keenum starts. Not sure what others have seen from him that makes them think he can be good. He had one good season in Minnesota 5 years ago

2-0 as a starter for the Browns last year. So honestly, not sure what you’re talking about. Granted, he had a great running game to work with. The Bills lack that, and it’s not the fault of the backs. The OL is horrible at run blocking. That’s the real issue when you start a guy like Keenum.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Instead of focusing on our ailments, let’s look at the Vikings defensive strengths and deficiencies, and see how this might play into the Bills potential game plan, with or without, Josh Allen:

 

Below are a few Vikings defensive rankings in comparison to the rest of the league: 

 

Rush Yards Per Game (10th)

Pass Yards Per Game (27th)
Points Allowed Per Game (12th)

Total Sacks (9th)

- Za’Darius Smith leads the team with 8.5 and Danielle Hunter has 5


Thoughts -

 

It seems that the Vikings statistically have a middle of the road defense, who has shown the ability to create turnovers and get to the QB with their two main pass rushers. Their LBs (Kendricka/Hicks) are older, yet athletic, veteran players, as well as some of their secondary (Peterson/Smith).

 

Regardless of who is at QB, I would like to think that Dorsey can create a more horizontal attack than we’ve seen in the last few games. I want to put pressure on those edge rushers early, and create match ups with those LBs with some of our speedier guys (McKenzie, Hines, Cook).

 

I would hope to see some bubble screens and jet sweeps early while sprinkling in full-motion and misdirection later on to try and get this defense moving laterally. This can slow a pass rush, or avoid it entirely, if you are successful early. It also provides Allen or Case quick and reliable targets to get into a rhythm. Easier said than done, especially if they stick to a traditional 3-4 alignment. We’ll need WRs carrying a large blocking load, and Davis has proven capable in this role. 

I don’t anticipate a large philosophical pivot if Keenum plays. They aren’t changing up front, so they won’t all of a sudden be built to run the ball down the throats of the defense. Find ways to get our players a competitive advantage, with or without Allen, through alignment, misdirection, and pre-snap formations to  identify match ups that use speed and angles to find success. 
 

Im just going to leave this here:

 

Nyheim Hines 40 yard dash time? 4.38

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...