Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's the old Bill Parcells / Giants approach used to beat Buffalo in the Superbowl:  ball control and time of possesion.  Run the ball often and effectively thereby keeping the ball out of Josh's hands.  That and putting A LOT of pressure on JA17.  You saw Green Bay do it last week and now the Jets ... only Wilson had more production than A Rogers.  You also saw that the Buffalo offense was not on the field for long periods of time last week and this week.  

Granted, Bills had an off day, but that makes two weeks in a row.  Josh has regressed since the bye.  Tough to watch that pile of dooty today ... all three phases were sub par.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Vomit 3
  • Eyeroll 5
  • Disagree 1
  • Agree 4
  • Dislike 1
Posted
Just now, DallasBillsFan1 said:

It's the old Bill Parcells / Giants approach used to beat Buffalo in the Superbowl:  ball control and time of possesion.  Run the ball often and effectively thereby keeping the ball out of Josh's hands.  That and putting A LOT of pressure on JA17.  You saw Green Bay do it last week and now the Jets ... only Wilson had more production than A Rogers.  You also saw that the Buffalo offense was not on the field for long periods of time last week and this week.  

Granted, Bills had an off day, but that makes two weeks in a row.  Josh has regressed since the bye.  Tough to watch that pile of dooty today ... all three phases were sub par.

And all that and STILL

 

6-2

 

tops in the AFCE

Tops in the AFC. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Josh played like garbage; that's the formula for our loss today.


When he returns to form, we'll be winning by double digits again.

 

 

1 minute ago, Mrbojanglezs said:

Cancel the season and move to Toronto 

peasants-revolting-pitchforks-and-torche

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 5
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, DallasBillsFan1 said:

It's the old Bill Parcells / Giants approach used to beat Buffalo in the Superbowl:  ball control and time of possesion.  Run the ball often and effectively thereby keeping the ball out of Josh's hands.  That and putting A LOT of pressure on JA17.  You saw Green Bay do it last week and now the Jets ... only Wilson had more production than A Rogers.  You also saw that the Buffalo offense was not on the field for long periods of time last week and this week.  

Granted, Bills had an off day, but that makes two weeks in a row.  Josh has regressed since the bye.  Tough to watch that pile of dooty today ... all three phases were sub par.

It only “works” if 17 gives the ball away.  Keep giving away points other teams can hang around. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

That will not work effectively for more than a few games. Allen is not going to continue playing like this.

Edited by Big Turk
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)

That strategy works very well when almost half of our starters on D are out, but what happens when we're 'mostly' healthy?

 

*Had to edit due to all the chicken littles on this board.

Edited by Amaru523
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
5 minutes ago, DallasBillsFan1 said:

It's the old Bill Parcells / Giants approach used to beat Buffalo in the Superbowl:  ball control and time of possesion.  Run the ball often and effectively thereby keeping the ball out of Josh's hands.  That and putting A LOT of pressure on JA17.  You saw Green Bay do it last week and now the Jets ... only Wilson had more production than A Rogers.  You also saw that the Buffalo offense was not on the field for long periods of time last week and this week.  

Granted, Bills had an off day, but that makes two weeks in a row.  Josh has regressed since the bye.  Tough to watch that pile of dooty today ... all three phases were sub par.

And expect the QB to throw like *****!

Posted

There is truth there, but Allen still threw that INT on the 1st drive of the game.

 

The Jets won today because of this:

 

- Strong Jets D-Line

- Careless and overconfident Allen

- Milano/Poyer out

- Giving Wilson an easy game (little blitz, easy outlet/screen passes, wide open runs for 1st down)

- Poor run defense

- Davis drops

- Not even attempting a running game

 

The Jets have good trenches. My opinion is that we lose today because Allen was careless and Wilson wasn't tested. 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
Just now, Amaru523 said:

That strategy works very well when almost half of our starters on D are out, but what happens when we're healthy?


I don’t know.  You tell me.  Can we get healthy?

 

Issues on this team right now go far beyond injuries. 
 

Allen-Dorsey-WR2 is a massive issue right now and they are all intertwined.

 

Run Defense has been a mid-season problem for years under McD.  Good news is he usually figures it out.   Bad news, mid-season lulls are why we havent yet escape postseason games at Arrowhead. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 4
Posted
4 minutes ago, Amaru523 said:

That strategy works very well when almost half of our starters on D are out, but what happens when we're healthy?

And that didn't really matter.  Josh was hot garbage; we will lose every time he plays that poorly.

 

And we'll likely win, probably by a lot, when is all world.

 

It's all Josh, all the time.

 

It always was.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Josh sucked.  If he plays like we know he can, we’ll be fine.  If he doesn’t, our season is over.  We had a mid season offensive funk this time last year.  Hopefully we can figure it out 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, SCBills said:


I don’t know.  You tell me.  Can we get healthy?

 

Issues on this team right now go far beyond injuries. 
 

Allen-Dorsey-WR2 is a massive issue right now and they are all intertwined.

 

Run Defense has been a mid-season problem for years under McD.  Good news is he usually figures it out.   Bad news, mid-season lulls are why we havent yet escape postseason games at Arrowhead. 

Why can't they get healthy? Other than Hyde, none of the injuries are season ending. Unless they're extremely unlucky they should be fine. 

Posted

A way we have been figured out is that teams are doubling Stefon diggs and putting they’re cb1 on gabe. Gabe hasn’t done well and McKenzie hasn’t preformed consistently enough.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...