Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Process said:

Hines and Cook play a similar role. 

 

To trade picks and pick up this contract means they are giving up on Cook already. 

 

I really don't get the move....

 

 


Not giving up. But Hines is a significant upgrade over Cook this season which is obviously the focus. 
 

I agree it’s problematic Beane used a 2nd round pick and yet was still stuck in the RB market. McKissic continues to reverberate. 

  • Vomit 1
  • Eyeroll 2
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, BananaB said:

So we wasted a 2nd rd pick on a 3rd down back only to go get another one mid season.  Good job! 

Again, no. You don't use a 2nd round pick to have 3rd down back. Singletary is in his final year of his contract. Cook is your RB1 in 23

  • Like (+1) 6
Posted
4 minutes ago, Process said:

Hines and Cook play a similar role. 

 

To trade picks and pick up this contract means they are giving up on Cook already. 

 

I really don't get the move....

 

 

 

Singletary probably won't be back.  That means you have Cook and Hines at RB next year.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 4
Posted

Here's the thing.  I like Hines.  He's a good player.  He is basically what they want Cook to be, but without the rookie mistakes.  He's a consistent back that will be able to line up in the slot and catch the ball out of the backfield.  He'll be able to help Cook along the way and hopefully allow Cook to be ready to be the player they hope he turns into next season.  But this is a move for now.  They've been chasing a "type" and not a specific player since the offseason and they finally got one. 

 

All that said, they certainly focused their attention on a position I don't think is nearly our biggest need.  Here's hoping they know something about OBJ coming here when he's ready that we don't know.  But hey.....it's a new toy and in this type of offense, I think he will make some plays for us.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Pete said:

Hines makes Cook irrelevant- I don’t like it right now.

 

Dolphins beat us already and add Chubb.

 

 

Dolphins beat us by 2 at home with us missing 5 offensive linemen and our entire starting secondary.  They really need some coverage linebackers kind of odd seeing them go pass rusher 

Edited by Generic_Bills_Fan
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said:

I've never seen a fan base so excited to trade for a guy averaging 2 yards a carry. #WINNING

 

He isnt a 3 down back. He is a pass catching back.  Kind of unfair to give him 2 yards a carry on an avg of 2.5 attempts a game too... Rest of career 3.7 to 4.9 ypc.

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/3916430/nyheim-hines

 

It is odd though with Cooks. Maybe they just want someone more experienced filling this role for Dorseys offense.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, appoo said:

Again, no. You don't use a 2nd round pick to have 3rd down back. Singletary is in his final year of his contract. Cook is your RB1 in 23

 

Yeah - this by no means should be interpreted as "giving up on Cook."  Cook is a big part of the Bills future, imo.

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
Just now, wppete said:

How much did we pay????

Zach moths in a conditional sex

 

I left that as voice to text... Because it was more fun. But Zach Moss and a conditional sixth

 

. I need to speak more clearly

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Shocked 1
  • Haha (+1) 10
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...