Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:35 PM, jlgarsh said:

But it saya he did pay the fee? That's the confusing part for me. 

Expand  

He is paying 4M in a license.  The NFL gave him a letter recently (of course it is after the nice new 30M sponsorship from FanDuel) that Logos for graphics are not included in that license.  That is what I understand about this situation.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:37 PM, MAJBobby said:

He is paying 4M in a license.  The NFL gave him a letter recently (of course it is after the nice new 30M sponsorship from FanDuel) that Logos for graphics are not included in that license.  That is what I understand about this situation.

Expand  

Thanks for the context. It'll probably work itself out behind the scenes.

Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:39 PM, ndirish1978 said:

LOL @MAJBobby calling Patrick a simp while simping for the NFL. 

Expand  

Ahhh look someone else thinks the NFL should allow people to profit off their IP for nothing.

 

I thought we liked Capitalism in America

  On 11/1/2022 at 2:41 PM, DrDawkinstein said:

 

He's misused Simp and Gaslighting so far. Someone take this boomer's internet access away before he starts trying to floss dance. 🤣

Expand  

So do I fail TBD posting final?  What is my grade Professor

Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:04 PM, MAJBobby said:

Not a silly opinion. It is Capitalism. You want to profit of NFL materials PAY THE FEES. 
 

just that easy. All broadcasters do. So take some of your 30M a year made selling gambling to people that cannot afford it and send the fees for use of the logos. Or don’t. But crying about it ***** off 

Do you give away your ***** for FREE? 

Expand  

 

 

 

Um, because there are situations where trying to maximize your income will have unintended consequences that will actually end up costing you money overall.

 

You do "give away your best *****" (do you really feel that team logos are the NFL's "best *****"? Seriously?) for free, if not giving your best ***** for free is going to cost you much more in the long run in bad publicity and aggravation, yes.

 

McAfee might be a bull they don't want to poke. Too early to be sure, but it's quite possible. He's done a great job bringing the NFL a ton of good positive publicity. Could he end up costing them money and tremendous irritation in the long run? Maybe.

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:44 PM, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

 

Um, because there are situations where trying to maximize your income will have unintended consequences that will actually end up costing you money overall.

 

You do "give away your best *****" (do you really feel that team logos are the NFL's "best *****"? Seriously?) for free, if not giving your best ***** for free is going to cost you much more in the long run in bad publicity and aggravation, yes.

 

McAfee might be a bull they don't want to poke. Too early to be sure, but it's quite possible. He's done a great job bringing the NFL a ton of good positive publicity. Could he end up costing them money and tremendous irritation in the long run? Maybe.

 

 

Expand  

Yeah ok....  A lot of people have taken on the NFL, they just chew them up and spit them out, McAfee is no different. 

 

Quick what do you think Pat will do if he gets a letter tomorrow from FanDuel saying we are going to cancel our sponsorship because you do not have access to logos?  Or you want to take on the NFL over a little license fee upgrade?

 

You know the same FanDuel that is also in bed with the NFL

  On 11/1/2022 at 2:45 PM, DrDawkinstein said:

 

Capital(ism) F! :bag:

 

Expand  

Sweet, so do I have to repeat the course?

Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:44 PM, Thurman#1 said:

 

 

 

Um, because there are situations where trying to maximize your income will have unintended consequences that will actually end up costing you money overall.

 

You do "give away your best *****" (do you really feel that team logos are the NFL's "best *****"? Seriously?) for free, if not giving your best ***** for free is going to cost you much more in the long run in bad publicity and aggravation, yes.

 

McAfee might be a bull they don't want to poke. Too early to be sure, but it's quite possible. He's done a great job bringing the NFL a ton of good positive publicity. Could he end up costing them money and tremendous irritation in the long run? Maybe.

 

 

Expand  

Depending on what he’s capable of putting into public conversation he could potentially provide ammo or witnesses for congressional hearings. 🤷‍♂️. Gonna be interesting to see if something actually happens, but I’d be willing to bet he gets a ratings spike if he starts doing a “dark side of the league” segment every week. 

Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:04 PM, MAJBobby said:

Do you give away your ***** for FREE? 

Expand  

 

  On 11/1/2022 at 2:15 PM, MAJBobby said:

A Couple things.  

 

the NFL doesnt need to give away anything for Free Marketing.  They need to maximize all the revenue that they can maximize.  

 

Pats Show would not have a 30M a year contract to Fan Duel without the NFL would it?

 

So time for NFL to say you want to use our logos on your gambling graphic that you get 30M a year for.......  PAY US.  

 

How he will attack it, is will quietly pay the license fee and get access to the logos again, his 30M contract from Fan Duel will likely FORCE that.

Expand  

I didn’t say that they “needed” to give away their product.  You asked the question.  I answered your question.  My answer is correct.  Millions of business give away trillions of dollars worth of assets every year.  You’re acting as if this doesn’t exist.  It’s sales 101.

Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:48 PM, Buffalo Junction said:

Depending on what he’s capable of putting into public conversation he could potentially provide ammo or witnesses for congressional hearings. 🤷‍♂️. Gonna be interesting to see if something actually happens, but I’d be willing to bet he gets a ratings spike if he starts doing a “dark side of the league” segment every week. 

Expand  

Does he do it with FanDuel sends the letter saying their will end their 120M sponsorship?

  On 11/1/2022 at 2:49 PM, NewEra said:

 

I didn’t say that they “needed” to give away their product.  You asked the question.  I answered your question.  My answer is correct.  Millions of business give away trillions of dollars worth of assets every year.  You’re acting as if this doesn’t exist.  It’s sales 101.

Expand  

OK Cool so now this one..  Should the NFL give their IP away for free?  Or should they maximize their revenue?

Posted

Great, more grievance from the wackadoodles... as if we didn't have enough already to deal with.

 

Never listen to the show, don't care so long as the Mannings alternate telecast remains, which is hands down the best NFL watch today.

  • Disagree 1
Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:49 PM, MAJBobby said:

Does he do it with FanDuel sends the letter saying their will end their 120M sponsorship?

Expand  

Probably not, but who knows. None of those guys are hurting for money. He’ll probably just pay and then reduce the fluff afterwards. Business is business and if he tries it and gets a rating boost he’ll keep it up. 

Posted
  On 11/1/2022 at 2:46 PM, MAJBobby said:

Yeah ok....  A lot of people have taken on the NFL, they just chew them up and spit them out, McAfee is no different. 

 

Quick what do you think Pat will do if he gets a letter tomorrow from FanDuel saying we are going to cancel our sponsorship because you do not have access to logos?  Or you want to take on the NFL over a little license fee upgrade?

 

You know the same FanDuel that is also in bed with the NFL

Sweet, so do I have to repeat the course?

Expand  

But they aren’t going to do that because Pat is the best in the business and that’s why they pay him 30M per year.  
 

They don’t pay him because he has access to logos.  I certainly don’t watch him because of the nfl logos.  Fairly certain not one person on earth watches him because he shows NFL logos.  So…..your bolded is 💩 

  • Like (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...