Did Milano intercept that ball late in the first half & why wasn't there a booth review?

[Freddie's Dead]

The ball clearly hit the red in the Bills logo at midfield.  Not an INT.

[MAJBobby]

8 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

Yes, my understanding is if your hands are under and the ground didn't affect possession then the tip can hit the ground, which was the case.

 

More so the fact there wasn't a review was perplexing.

Actually the ball clearly Came up from hitting the ground. It aided the catch. But I will admit if the call on the field was a pick it would have likely stayed as well. 

[Einstein]

Incomplete. But super close!

 

 

[zow2]

It looked like a few of those rubber pellets flew up as the tip of the ball hit the ground.  It was barely noticeable but i think it would not have been overturned.

[strive_for_five_guy]

Couldn’t Milano’s hands have also caused the black pellets to spray up, not just the tip of the ball???

[Billsfan1972]

5 minutes ago, Einstein said:

Incomplete. But super close!

 

 

If anything that looks more like an interception.

[US Egg]

Ok, I’ll say it.

 

Refs and NFL didn’t want a blow out prime time game.

 

I feel better.

[Big Turk]

They don't stop the play anymore for those type of reviews...they do an "expedited review" and if there is nothing to change, the play keeps going. 

[Kwai San]

21 minutes ago, Dopey said:

If it’s the play I’m thinking of, that was a helluva play by Edmunds on coverage and creating the possibility of an interception. 

 

Edmunds quietly had a 16 tackle game.....not that the Edmunds haters wanna see THAT!

[djp14150]

37 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

I know a challenge flag can't be thrown in the last 2 minutes, but that was an Int from the angles I saw.  

 

My guess is only on a change of possession is a booth review done, though I thought there was one (and they do) on receptions.

 

   

Under 2 minutes the booth can trigger reviews on ALL plays if an incorrect call might have been made that can be challenged.

[Jukester]

5 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

They don't stop the play anymore for those type of reviews...they do an "expedited review" and if there is nothing to change, the play keeps going. 

 

Yes agree. It was within 2 minutes so my assumpiton is the officials in the "sky" took a look at it quickly and deemed it hit the ground, which the video posted by @Einstein clearly shows.  I thought the same wnen they showed the replay on the telecast.  

 

[Dopey]

1 minute ago, Kwai San said:

 

Edmunds quietly had a 16 tackle game.....not that the Edmunds haters wanna see THAT!

Right. 

[Billsfan1972]

3 minutes ago, Jukester said:

 

Yes agree. It was within 2 minutes so my assumpiton is the officials in the "sky" took a look at it quickly and deemed it hit the ground, which the video posted by @Einstein clearly shows.  I thought the same wnen they showed the replay on the telecast.  

 

Huh???? No way is it clear.

[Solomon Grundy]

28 minutes ago, Dopey said:

If it’s the play I’m thinking of, that was a helluva play by Edmunds on coverage and creating the possibility of an interception. 

@Dopey, are you trying to get banned from this forum? Speaking positively about Edmunds might trigger it😎

Edited October 31, 2022 by Solomon Grundy

[FireChans]

The ball richochets off the ground before Milano has any control.  It was close, but not an INT.

[K D]

Tip of ball hit the ground. End of thread 

[Rocky Landing]

Just the amount of debate on this thread shows that there isn't enough to overturn the ruling on the field.

[Frostbite]

Thought it was an interception but the ruling on the field was incomplete (after discussion and taking away the INT). Nothing conclusive in the replays could overturn it. Side note, thought it was great that NY can call down during the game to get a call right, and quickly. Perks of being the only game played i guess.

[bmur66]

Milano was so close to having 3 pics last night

[Buffalo03]

Nope. Hit the ground