Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

In exchange for chewing up all the clock for zero return.  Almost 11 mins of clock in the third quarter for a return of 3 points while down 3 scores.  You dont win a football game that way.

That's only because they didn't execute on those drive ending plays. That doesn't change the fact a team with a poor receiving core right now was able to gouge our D for way too many big plays on the ground.

Edited by Billz4ever
Posted

So there's definitely a couple of things I like about this game:

 

I think first and foremost I like the fact that Buffalo tried to play their own game before adjusting and attacking the weakness of the Packers. What I mean by that is that the opening drive was a three and out, but that 3 and out happened because Buffalo attacked downfield and tried to get big plays even though the secondary is the strength of the defense. I always like when Buffalo plays like they're better than the other team and goes with their own strength and identity first before they adjust and attack the weakness.

 

The best takeaway is that Buffalo was able to win without Josh Allen really having to do much. They were able to use a running back attack to get down the field and that helped get them off to their great start.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Boatdrinks said:

3 years ago this was a solid win. When you expect to be the AFC Super Bowl representative it was below what they’re capable of. They left a lot of plays out on the field and the execution was off in several key situations. 218 yards or whatever for Josh with 2 INTs is sub par for sure. 

Im ok with it if this is Allen's "bad game" and we still come away with a pretty easy W. 

Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

McD acknowledged they didn't play their best ball tonight and didn't make it seem all rosie and rainbows, so I'm glad they realize they have some rust to knock off after the bye.  Time to clean that up and put them away.  The second half of this game should've been like the Pittsburgh game with a quick put them away and move on.

I think he hit a good balance of we expect to play better than that, but also winning is tough in this league so this was still good.

Edited by Warcodered
  • Agree 1
Posted

If Josh is gonna throw two bad picks, this is is the game to do it. He'll look at the film and clean it up so I doubt we'll see bad throws on the run for a while. He learns from his mistakes.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
1 minute ago, newcam2012 said:

Not sure what point you are trying to make? 

 

That the game never really was a game despite us trying to give GB chances to make it one.

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, redtail hawk said:

that we dominated despite playing well below potential?

I don't disagree with that. The Bills were by far the superior team. This type of performance won't cut it against quality teams. Today we faced a Packer team.that is not very good and had many injuries as well. They fought hard and the Bills did not play well in the 2nd half. I'm happy with the win. I don't there is cause for alarm. What scares me is the Poyer injury. 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

The pack was never going to win this game and they knew it. It was kind of sad really. I expected more as I reluctantly predicted a GB win but I gave them too much credit.

No, I'm sure the Pack knew they weren't going to win, but to give up those kind of chunks of yards on the ground against a team that thinks they can play nickel D and still stop the run, that was not a good showing.

Edited by Billz4ever
  • Agree 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, UKBillFan said:

 

The Packers didn't really have to do anything to stay in the game though. We allowed them to hang around.

 

Being down 3 scores until 3:33 in the 4th quarter and then down two scores still is not hanging around.  Enough non sense.  This game was never in jeorpardy.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

Wondering if the other teams look at this and start trying to get in the Bills heads with all the trash talk and extra curricular stuff.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 2
Posted
Just now, ScottLaw said:

Davis continues to be an enigma…. Great one game, horrible the next. 

I agree about consistency. However, I think he shows up in the big games when had really needed. He seems to have KCs number. That's pretty important...

Posted
4 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

That's only because they didn't execute on those drive ending plays. That doesn't change the fact a team with a poor receiving core right now was able to gouge our D for way too many big plays on the ground.

 

 The Bills defense would've played differently if we weren't down 2 all-pros in the secondary and a 3rd one in the 4th quarter. They would've stacked the **** out if the box and played man to man against the receiving crew.

 

 

Posted

"NFL Research: The Bills' 6-1 start is their best since 1993 when Buffalo began the season 7-1, finishing the regular season at 12-4 en route to a loss in Super Bowl XXVII. Buffalo has advanced to (and lost) the Super Bowl in each of its last three seasons starting 6-1."

Posted
2 minutes ago, Big Turk said:

Wondering if the other teams look at this and start trying to get in the Bills heads with all the trash talk and extra curricular stuff.

I don't think that played a factor in the game. I think teams will try to exploit the run defense of the Bills. This also keeps the ball out of Allen's hands. 

Posted
Just now, newcam2012 said:

I don't think that played a factor in the game. I think teams will try to exploit the run defense of the Bills. This also keeps the ball out of Allen's hands. 

 

I doubt it works that well again. The Bills came in as the #1 run D in the NFL.

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Billz4ever said:

That's only because they didn't execute on those drive ending plays. That doesn't change the fact a team with a poor receiving core right now was able to gouge our D for way too many big plays on the ground.

 

Exactly... they didnt execute.  They burned all their clock on their own and didnt execute. Also the Bills stuffed the run when it mattered.  Thats why running teams dont win many games.  That isnt likely to happen again.  They were telling GB to run the ball knowing GB didnt have the clock.  Missed tackles suck but its one game.  They been stout against the run all year.  It'll be fine. 

Edited by Scott7975
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said:

 

 The Bills defense would've played differently if we weren't down 2 all-pros in the secondary and a 3rd one in the 4th quarter. They would've stacked the **** out if the box and played man to man against the receiving crew.

 

 

You can claim they would've done this or that, but the fact is they were getting gouged and that was typical of Frazier not being able to adapt to what the opposing offense is doing. And if you know you're down those players, you must adapt.  Letting the other team rip off 10 , 20 yard runs is effectively the same as a passing game.  You tell the D line to play the run, not the pass.  It seemed like our D line was playing the pass all night.

2 minutes ago, newcam2012 said:

I don't think that played a factor in the game. I think teams will try to exploit the run defense of the Bills. This also keeps the ball out of Allen's hands. 

It seemed as though our D, especially D line, was playing the pass when you knew they were going to keep running the ball.  I blame the D play calling.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...