Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Generic_Bills_Fan said:

I was gonna say our stadium looks much better than theirs actually lol their stadium looks like a fancy coffee shop or a top golf 😁

It also looks like the original PlayStation game console from overhead view. 

Posted
1 hour ago, quinnearlysghost88 said:

Have you seen the titans renderings? We are definitely going the cheap route. 
 

https://www.tennesseetitans.com/news/titans-release-renderings-of-proposed-new-stadium

Tennessee! Now that's an experience-based stadium. 

 

I'd travel there to see that. 

 

As far as the Bills? I get it, we don't have palm trees and aqua blue water, but a lot of wait for a pretty basic looking stadium, average Jumbotron. 

 

 

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

It's really just a bad rendering of it.  Looking at the right side of the field, it looks like it barely covers anything.  If you look on the left side, I think the canopy is more accurate as it is covering most of the levels and probably little of the lower bowl.

I agree, I think once construction begins the canopy will be more pronounced.  I'm not worried and the design looks really nice.

Posted
7 minutes ago, elroy16 said:

 

 

Would you really want them to maximize wind swirl and turn every game into a mess where no one can pass the ball? I know Allen has a canon but he can't throw through everything.

 

I'm pretty sure they designed the stadium to minimize the wind, which is the way to go.

 

Maximizing crowd noise should definitely be a priority.

 


And I’m pretty sure putting a roof on it would have accomplished that. Also not building it in the middle of nowhere again could have helped.

Just now, LABILLBACKER said:

I agree, I think once construction begins the canopy will be more pronounced.  I'm not worried and the design looks really nice.

Keep telling yourself that

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, SDS said:


I can’t imagine the marginal people at the stadiums affects readings numbers. 10k to 20k people are in the noise.

the point is making it harder and more expensive to get a ticket. Creating more of a need for people to watch on TV. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Rock-A-Bye Beasley said:


And I’m pretty sure putting a roof on it would have accomplished that. Also not building it in the middle of nowhere again could have helped.

Keep telling yourself that

 

You mad, bro?

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

Tennessee! Now that's an experience-based stadium. 

 

I'd travel there to see that. 

 

As far as the Bills? I get it, we don't have palm trees and aqua blue water, but a lot of wait for a pretty basic looking stadium, average Jumbotron. 

 

 

Yeah, I’m fine with our new stadium, and don’t want to be “negative”. I just wish it looked less like a European soccer stadium. Hoping they add at least one unique feature. It seems like a copy and paste design. 

Edited by SirAndrew
Posted

When the times comes the Bills will probably do tours with season ticket holders with the most seniority going first. They will get first choice on where they want their new location to be in the stadium. Trying to move thousands of season ticket holders from the current stadium to the new one will take time. That is what the Giants and Jets did when it came time to go from Giants Stadium to MetLife.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Rock-A-Bye Beasley said:

Am I mad they’re building another open air stadium in the middle of nowhere costing taxpayers a billion dollars you ask? Yes

 

That's unfortunate.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

 

There's still older cameras in use, usually for less important games. And as time goes on, they're only going to keep getting better. 

Lol. The cameras aren't the problem. The shadow is. Unless they edit the shadow out and put sunlight there it will be annoying. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, UConn James said:


If rain comes perfectly straight downward.

With all of the "wind confusion" the rain won't know what to do!

Posted
9 minutes ago, CountDorkula said:

The commish makes 44 mil a year. I think I he can afford a few more 4K cameras….. haha

 

It's the networks cameras, and they're locked into massive investments in older broadcast technology. 4k cinema cameras that have a million times better image quality are a fraction of the price of the old dinosaur tv cameras. 

 

The shots they cut away to on the field that look cool as hell are often freelancers with a $2,000 camera and it looks a million times better than the $500,000 camera shooting the sideline...

 

But yeah, they need to get with the times. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...