Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, mannc said:

Completely different

How so?     Refs have a job to do.  They do it.    Opposing players have a job to do.  They do it.    All of it takes place on the field.    What happens off it is immaterial.

  • Vomit 3
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Shake_My_Head said:

How so?     Refs have a job to do.  They do it.    Opposing players have a job to do.  They do it.    All of it takes place on the field.    What happens off it is immaterial.

One is a show of sportsmanship and the other could imply bias that affects the integrity of the game. These autographs are like currency these days. Dude is paid plenty as it is.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Shake_My_Head said:

How so?     Refs have a job to do.  They do it.    Opposing players have a job to do.  They do it.    All of it takes place on the field.    What happens off it is immaterial.

Players might trade jerseys…what did the ref trade for Evans’s autograph? And don’t you think the ref might be somewhat less likely to call OPI (or more likely to call dpi) on Evans in the future? At a minimum, it’s a horrible look.

  • Agree 6
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

I cannot believe these posts - somebody responded by saying, "if it happens off the field it is immaterial".  So if the ref is given money off the field is that immaterial?  In a sport where one call can turn the course of a game (Brady this year against Atlanta, Brady last year against Atlanta when the refs moved the ball forward for a first down) the refs need not only be fair and unbiased, they need to put themselves above even the mere possibility of impropriety.  Do I think the ref was helping out the Bucs today? No! - but that is not the point.  The referees need to be be aware of the optics to all fans so fans can believe the outcomes of all games are legitimate.

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, bdomdbomb said:

I cannot believe these posts - somebody responded by saying, "if it happens off the field it is immaterial".  So if the ref is given money off the field is that immaterial?  In a sport where one call can turn the course of a game (Brady this year against Atlanta, Brady last year against Atlanta when the refs moved the ball forward for a first down) the refs need not only be fair and unbiased, they need to put themselves above even the mere possibility of impropriety.  Do I think the ref was helping out the Bucs today? No! - but that is not the point.  The referees need to be be aware of the optics to all fans so fans can believe the outcomes of all games are legitimate.

Exactly. And since this is now making its rounds on the internet, I'm sure this dude will get a call from the league to never do that again. If there's one thing Rodg hates its bad optics.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, RochesterLifer said:

The ref could have children, nephews or nieces who are a fan. I don’t have a problem with this. To make this an issue is silly.

Quid pro quo….. anybody……Bueller……Bueller?

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...