Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 8/6/2023 at 5:53 PM, Big Blitz said:

 

Expand  

 

Your own article doesn't actually link anything.  They claim by going through insurance data that they can link the vaccine to still births.  But it is simply guessing based on when the vaccine went live, and 9 months later.  No other supporting data is given.

 

And, from the article itself: "That makes COVID-19 vaccine-induced spontaneous abortion the most plausible hypothesis for the drop in birth rates — because the same number of women were becoming pregnant, but fewer of them were carrying their pregnancies to term."

 

The author of the article is a political writer from a political website created by RFK Jr., and supporting his anti vaccine book at every turn.  

 

 

I am not saying that these absolutely couldn't be linked, but the article just gathers a bunch of random data and then claims they must be linked without actually linking any of it directly.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/6/2023 at 6:17 PM, cle23 said:

 

Your own article doesn't actually link anything.  They claim by going through insurance data that they can link the vaccine to still births.  But it is simply guessing based on when the vaccine went live, and 9 months later.  No other supporting data is given.

 

And, from the article itself: "That makes COVID-19 vaccine-induced spontaneous abortion the most plausible hypothesis for the drop in birth rates — because the same number of women were becoming pregnant, but fewer of them were carrying their pregnancies to term."

 

The author of the article is a political writer from a political website created by RFK Jr., and supporting his anti vaccine book at every turn.  

 

 

I am not saying that these absolutely couldn't be linked, but the article just gathers a bunch of random data and then claims they must be linked without actually linking any of it directly.

Expand  

I do understand that this could be a different unrelated cause, but what could it be that would explain this kind of jump? Myocarditis is almost certainly from the vaccine, but so many of the other ailments that are blamed on it are as likely from people being shut ins for 3 year. I truly believe that the vaccine was a bad idea for young people.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 8/6/2023 at 10:23 PM, Orlando Tim said:

I do understand that this could be a different unrelated cause, but what could it be that would explain this kind of jump? Myocarditis is almost certainly from the vaccine, but so many of the other ailments that are blamed on it are as likely from people being shut ins for 3 year. I truly believe that the vaccine was a bad idea for young people.

Expand  

 

I am not arguing that it's not possible.  My issue is a very biased website pushing out articles based on "research" that links things with no direct evidence provided.  Are the side effects caused by the vaccine?  It's possible.  But the article says they are linked, and then just says that A and B happened and makes the assumption that they are linked.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/6/2023 at 10:46 PM, cle23 said:

 

I am not arguing that it's not possible.  My issue is a very biased website pushing out articles based on "research" that links things with no direct evidence provided.  Are the side effects caused by the vaccine?  It's possible.  But the article says they are linked, and then just says that A and B happened and makes the assumption that they are linked.

Expand  

scientific objectivity is not their strong suit.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
  On 8/6/2023 at 10:23 PM, Orlando Tim said:

I do understand that this could be a different unrelated cause, but what could it be that would explain this kind of jump? Myocarditis is almost certainly from the vaccine, but so many of the other ailments that are blamed on it are as likely from people being shut ins for 3 year. I truly believe that the vaccine was a bad idea for young people.

Expand  

This is what happens when you have a regime that demands censorship and control of information…Everyone is forced to use whatever info they have to make the best educated assumptions…This is why, in a free society, it is imperative to have open and honest dialogue about issues that govern people’s lives…

 

It’s unfortunate, but this is why nobody trusts the government or the msm, that has been captured, and does their bidding…

  • Agree 3
Posted (edited)
  On 8/6/2023 at 11:16 PM, JaCrispy said:

This is what happens when you have a regime that demands censorship and control of information…Everyone is forced to use whatever info they have to make the best educated assumptions…This is why, in a free society, it is imperative to have open and honest dialogue about issues that govern people’s lives…

 

It’s unfortunate, but this is why nobody trusts the government or the msm, that has been captured, and does their bidding…

Expand  

or you could just trust that the scientific expert consensus has your best interests at heart...cuz they do...it's way too enormous a community of disparate intellects to believe otherwise.  And they also want to live long, happy lives.

Edited by redtail hawk
  • Eyeroll 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/7/2023 at 1:03 AM, redtail hawk said:

or you could just trust that the scientific expert consensus has your best interests at heart...cuz they do...it's way too enormous a community of disparate intellects to believe otherwise.  And they also want to live long, happy lives.

Expand  

Check out The Great Barrington Declaration…

 

Almost 1 million signatures, including the top scientists and doctors in their fields, who disagreed with the “consensus”- or the acceptable narrative…

 

These people are censored, banned, and mocked about everything they stood for, by the “consensus”…Except they were right all along…👍

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/7/2023 at 3:23 AM, JaCrispy said:

Check out The Great Barrington Declaration…

 

Almost 1 million signatures, including the top scientists and doctors in their fields, who disagreed with the “consensus”- or the acceptable narrative…

 

These people are censored, banned, and mocked about everything they stood for, by the “consensus”…Except they were right all along…👍

Expand  

i have.  bunch of pseudoscientific charlatans.  why can't they make a legitimate living?

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Disagree 1
Posted
  On 8/7/2023 at 3:25 AM, redtail hawk said:

i have.  
 

bunch of pseudoscientific charlatans.  why can't they make a legitimate living?

Expand  


Bullsh*t


You haven’t read anything,

 

and your lack of understanding is clearly demonstrated by your ignorant attack

on the scientists who wrote it. 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 8/7/2023 at 7:29 AM, Chris farley said:

Tell us more about how righties that might/might not have taken the shot died off again?

 

 

Expand  

no f'in idea,u  been into the boones farm again.  just thinking about that makes me nauseous .  sartre wrote a book on it.  u should read it.

Edited by redtail hawk
Posted

Quack MD strikes again!

 

The GBD, led by infectious disease and epidemiology experts from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard are "psuedoscientific charlatans"

 

Meanwhile the actual 

psuedoscientific charlatans, the authors of the covid proximal origin paper, as shown by THEIR OWN private conversations that they didn't believe their own published conclusion.....Those guys he holds in high regard!

 

Leaving out the validity of any scientific claims by a given group or individual, it's nice to see ole Quack MD in his unquenchable thirst for scientific knowledge, supporting scientific censorship.

 

Because really, what can possibly show your strict adherence to scientific principles and the method that lays its very foundation more than supporting the silencing of scientific debate?

 

:lol: Quack MD indeed!

 

@redtail hawk

 

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/7/2023 at 8:17 AM, BillsFanNC said:

Quack MD strikes again!

 

The GBD, led by infectious disease and epidemiology experts from Stanford, Oxford and Harvard are "psuedoscientific charlatans"

 

Meanwhile the actual 

psuedoscientific charlatans, the authors of the covid proximal origin paper, as shown by THEIR OWN private conversations that they didn't believe their own published conclusion.....Those guys he holds in high regard!

 

Leaving out the validity of any scientific claims by a given group or individual, it's nice to see ole Quack MD in his unquenchable thirst for scientific knowledge, supporting scientific censorship.

 

Because really, what can possibly show your strict adherence to scientific principles and the method that lays its very foundation more than supporting the silencing of scientific debate?

 

:lol: Quack MD indeed!

 

@redtail hawk

 

 

 

Expand  

you are a joke. show me your molecular biology publications and I'll show you my medical ones.

×
×
  • Create New...