Jump to content

Sideline TEMPERATURE Dolphins v Vikings


DallasBillsFan1

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Bandito said:

Ok? And the Bills have the snow to their advantage. Everyone has home field advantage in some way shape or form.

 

No. The equivalent comparison would be that the Bills have an enclosed sideline that is somehow naturally heated, while the Dolphins sit exposed to the freezing temperatures and snow and the Bills say sorry you cant use heated benches or giant heaters because we don't.

 

Its just a dumb advantage that is going to get someone hurt. Players should have adequate respite on the sideline.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bandito said:

Everyone on this forum complained about the temperature being the main reason for the Bills losing. The Vikings beat MIA playing in the same circumstances. Do you not see the hypocrisy? 

Did you read what I wrote.

 

They were NOT playing tin the same circumstances.  One team has natural shade and 30 degree difference whereas the other team doesn't.  Why is that so hard to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Billsfan1972 said:

Big difference between cloud and sun.  Oh and no Tua

 

It was 123F on the Viking sideline in the 2nd half. It's fully sunny outside my window right now, even though it's 48F. 

 

One poses a player safety risk, the other has the sun out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bandito said:

LOL And? Excuses.

What are you trying to say? That Miami is a better team than the Bills? That the Vikings are? The season is going great and your being sarcastic about the one, flukey loss, why? Don’t you have anything better to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bandito said:

Ok? And the Bills have the snow to their advantage. Everyone has home field advantage in some way shape or form.

Is the snow 30 degrees colder on the opponent’s side of the field?

give your trolling crap a break

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Bandito said:

Everyone was on here clamoring about this exact thing when the Bills lost in Miami. The Vikings faced practically the same temperature circumstance and won. Don't make excuses. Life isn't fair. @Warcodered

We had a "cold" front sweep through here so the dew point was much lower for the Vikings game.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bandito said:

Everyone on this forum complained about the temperature being the main reason for the Bills losing. The Vikings beat MIA playing in the same circumstances. Do you not see the hypocrisy? 


The temperature was reason for the struggles in Miami. Not the sole reason. Other reasons include making elementary mistakes (The Vikings also suffered from this), coming off a short week (not an issue for the Vikings) and missing an extraordinary number of players in the secondary (not an issue for The Vikings). And yet they still only beat us by one score.


The underlying problem is heat stroke is a serious condition but it’s just being written off as “home field advantage”.

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bandito said:

Everyone on this forum complained about the temperature being the main reason for the Bills losing. The Vikings beat MIA playing in the same circumstances. Do you not see the hypocrisy? 

 

Sometimes you are wrong.  Well most of the time but we wont bring that up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Bandito said:

Ok? And the Bills have the snow to their advantage. Everyone has home field advantage in some way shape or form.

Are you really that slow that you don't realize both teams have to play in the snow? Completely different circumstance than having one team deal with 30 degree higher temperatures than the other team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, What a Tuel said:

 

Its not about winning or losing. The bills very nearly won too. Its just a stupid idea to have one shaded sideline and one not, and then say you cant have tents or any shade because we don't use it. 


The Miami coaches and players had no influence on the stadium being configured that way.  I railed against this after the Bills played there, but you can’t really blame those that decided to set it up this way, with the home team in the shade. Baseball teams do this also with the placement of the dugouts, although those players have some cover and they can sit.

 

As you mentioned, the real issue is player safety being disregarded with respect to protection from the elements, in this case being the heat and humidity.  Nobody should be forced to endure 120 degree temps without some protection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, What a Tuel said:

 

No. The equivalent comparison would be that the Bills have an enclosed sideline that is somehow naturally heated, while the Dolphins sit exposed to the freezing temperatures and snow and the Bills say sorry you cant use heated benches or giant heaters because we don't.

 

Its just a dumb advantage that is going to get someone hurt. Players should have adequate respite on the sideline.

 

The Pegulas should use their fracking experience to find a geothermal vent to build the new stadium in an orientation that it naturally heats the Bills' sideline in the sub-zero winter.  Watch the Fish fans hypocrites lose their crap about the "unfair advantage".

Edited by 1ManRaid
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do we actually know for sure that that temperature reading is accurate?  I don't know that human beings -- even NFL athletes -- are capable of doing anything in 120 degree weather.  I have five marathons under my belt (none terribly recent -- I'm past my racing days) and I wouldn't bother going out for even a short run in those conditions.  Neither would any other serious runner.  

 

My money is on "broken thermometer."

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1ManRaid said:

 

The Pegulas should use their fracking experience to find a geothermal vent to build the new stadium in an orientation that it naturally heats the Bills' sideline.  Watch the Fish fans lose their crap about the "unfair advantage".

 

100% for this for as long as the Dolphins practice this nonsense.

2 minutes ago, BobbyC81 said:


The Miami coaches and players had no influence on the stadium being configured that way.  I railed against this after the Bills played there, but you can’t really blame those that decided to set it up this way, with the home team in the shade. Baseball teams do this also with the placement of the dugouts, although those players have some cover and they can sit.

 

As you mentioned, the real issue is player safety being disregarded with respect to protection from the elements, in this case being the heat and humidity.  Nobody should be forced to endure 120 degree temps without some protection.

 

They actually do. As far as I know they can decline visitor sideline from using tents, misting benches etc even if they bring their own, so long as their side don't use them. It just so happens they don't have to use them because their side is shaded and 30 degrees cooler.

 

They did decline the Bills from utilizing them when we played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Bandito said:

You are an excuse machine. Time to move on from that loss. Bills lost fair and square. The Vikings pulled off the impossible! Beating the Dolphins in Miami while it is hot out!

This is what it looks like when you have no response to a valid argument

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RoyBatty is alive said:

Dopey, NFL rules mandate if one side got heaters or for the matter coolers/fans, other side gets equal access to same  but they positioned the field in Miami so the Dolphins get natural shade and the visitors dont.

 

Every game in Miami in Sept and October should start at 4 if not a night game.

 

OR, at the very least, the rules need to be altered to allow shade on the visitors side. To argue the home team didn’t use tents is ridiculous. THEY WERE IN THE SHADE. One team gets shade? BOTH teams get shade. It’s an unfair advantage, period. 

 

I’m not whining about losing that game. In a way, I’m kind of glad we lost and eliminated the “perfect season” pressure. But every single early season 1:00pm game provides an advantage to the home team, and could result in serious injury/illness or even death. If you think that is fair and safe, DC Tom wouldn’t even waste keystrokes on you. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...