Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

My totally uneducated guess:  There was a setback.  We will find out by next Wednesday whether it was a major setback or a minor setback.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bills!Win! said:

Don’t they have 21 days to activate him once he practices? That pretty much means he is playing for the Jets game right?

 

Yes, he will be on the main 53 roster for the Jets game.  What none of us know is how they plan on ramping him up.

 

Will they let him have a start in a game and play a series or two?

Will they let him sit in a depth role and bring him in late in a game that could be already won?

I'm hoping they got some sort of plan that brings him in and out during a game to confuse these "not so great" QBs they will be facing

in the next few weeks.

 

We will have to wait and see what the plan is.

Posted
2 minutes ago, BillyBilliams said:

 

Sounds reasonable.  However, he was injured Thanksgiving last year.  It's been 11 months.  He's been longer than what this suggests.


Last sentence of the article:

"...suggesting that an ACL tear recovery time of 10 months or longer may be associated with a lower risk of re-injury."

And as I also posted above, Jameson Williams, who also had a clean ACL tear and is younger than White, is also likely to roll into month 11 without having returned to the field.

I don't think it's that unusual.


I also saw that White is practicing in a non-contact jersey, which suggests that return is imminent. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, That's No Moon said:

Where do I go to get my apology from all the people who lambasted me for suggesting that Tre might not be ready for the start of the season, then the KC game, now the GB game?

 

I don't think I'm one of them, but I'll be glad to give you an apology if it'll make you feel better:

 

"I apologize to That's No Moon"

 

There ya go!

Posted

 

 

8 minutes ago, BillyBilliams said:

 

Sounds reasonable.  However, he was injured Thanksgiving last year.  It's been 11 months.  He's been longer than what this suggests.

His surgery was mid December and he was cleared to practice after 10 months 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

You're well within your rights to speculate about setbacks and additional damage, sure.  Absent sources to the contrary, perhaps it would be advisable to step away from the definitive pronouncements "it should not take 10 and a half months for an NFL player off an ACL tear with no other damage to get back on the field in this day and age", when there's a recent published study saying 13.6 months was the average time for NFL WR and RBs?

 

Found by a couple minutes of googling, btw

 

I stand by that if there was no other damage. I have already revoked my statement about that being the case with Tre. That was an honest mistake.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Logic said:

As long as we're fielding theories...

I believe the excellent Bills medical team knows that ACL injury recurrence is much greater if an athlete rushes back to the field. As such, and knowing that White is an important, long term foundational piece of the team, they're doing everything they can to make sure he's healthy in the long term.

https://www.uchealth.org/today/acl-tears-how-long-does-it-take-to-recover-and-return-to-sports/#:~:text=“That process can take nine,least eight to nine months.

 

“It takes a while for the graft to become part of the body and go through a process of we call ligamentization, which is becoming a new ligament,” McCarty said. “That process can take nine or 10 months.”


Although some exceptional athletes can return to sports in six months, a more realistic scenario after an ACL tear is a recovery time of at least eight to nine months.


“Even then, after you’ve done great therapy and have come back to sports, it can sometimes take another year before you feel normal again,” McCarty said.


His patients often tell him that it isn’t until the second season after ACL surgery that they feel like they have fully returned to their previous level of play.


Since everyone heals differently, there’s no set time for athletes to return to sports. Tests can determine whether or not a reconstructed knee is as functional as the other knee and up to the rigors of a particular sport. Doctors and physical therapists usually have the final say on whether or not an athlete is ready to compete safely.


Research shows that up to one-third of athletes sustain another ACL tear in the same or opposite knee within two years, suggesting that an ACL tear recovery time of 10 months or longer may be associated with a lower risk of re-injury.

 

 

This is…logic!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GoBills808 said:

Expecting him to step in and perform like a top 5 CB is wildly optimistic imo

 

maybe not right away, but he IS a top 5 CB, or at least top 10 when healthy and rolling

 

But you're right, he is going to need some time to ramp up and get rid of the rust 

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

Not all ACL injuries are created equal. I don't have any sources to cite but I'd be interested in seeing a breakdown of those injuries where, as we were told initially on Tre, no other structural damage or damage to other ligaments was found. 

 

From the experts I speak to (and admittedly they are more used to treating soccer players) the recovery range for the "typical" ACL tear (and knowing that no tear is ever quite that simple to badge) is 6-9 months. 

 

And there are NFL players who tore theirs after Tre who are back on the field, right? I don't buy that it has all been smooth sailing and he still isn't ready to play. He is making progress, that is good. But the Bills waited until the very last minute to PUP him which means at some point they thought there was a chance he'd play before week 4. Beane told us they were not ruling that out and were "running the clock" and now he still isn't ready come week 8? Yea. I believe there has been a setback somewhere that they are not telling us about which they are well within their rights to do. We are well within ours to speculate.

There is no such thing as “smooth sailing” when it comes to this kind of rehab. There are always peaks, valleys, and plateaus. Always. All the Bills have ever said is he is “on schedule” and if the Bills, in their response to the incessant questions about Tre and his recovery, somehow created an unrealistic expectation among the fan base, then that’s on us as fans who have defined what “on schedule” should mean based on arbitrary sources of information from those not privy to the only information that matters. 

 

Posted
Just now, John from Riverside said:

I wonder if it’s just as simple as the current guys are playing well so they feel they can just is Trey along 

 

Remember the chance of coming down with another injury due to such a long way off like a hamstring is very real


Plus, it’s not like the goal of this team is to claw its way into the playoffs. There is zero incentive whatsoever to rush him back in any way, shape or form. Even if it’s just minimizing wear and tear for later in the year since he hasn’t been able to perform his “usual” routine. Unless we hear otherwise, I’m actually happy they are being very cautious and calculated with his return. Good for everyone involved. 

  • Agree 2
Posted
11 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:

 

 

His surgery was mid December and he was cleared to practice after 10 months 

 

Mid December is a long time to wait for an ACL surgery.  I actually didn't know that.  I could have sworn it was within the first few days of Dec.  That means he took 10.5 months.  Which then is on track like you mentioned.

Posted
4 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

 

I stand by that if there was no other damage. I have already revoked my statement about that being the case with Tre. That was an honest mistake.

 

For a lay person with (from what you've said in various posts) no specialized medical or scientific training to be all "I stand by what I said" about RTP times, in the face of a published, peer reviewed, descriptive epidemiological study of position groups that would seem to present similar demands on the knee for pivoting on a planted foot in order to cut and change direction -

 

-  I don't get it, that's all.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, BillyBilliams said:

Mid December is a long time to wait for an ACL surgery.  I actually didn't know that.  I could have sworn it was within the first few days of Dec.  That means he took 10.5 months.  Which then is on track like you mentioned.

 

Tre' White injured his ACL on 11/25 and had surgery 12/16.   That's 3 weeks later.

 

It seems to be SOP these days to wait a period of time post-injury to perform surgery.  The idea seems to be to allow inflammation and swelling to subside, and even to do pre-operative PT.  2 weeks seems to be a common period of time, but the time is driven by how long it takes for the individual patient to reach the individual surgeon's desired end-point for performing surgery. 

 

So I don't think 3 weeks is unusual.

Edited by Beck Water
Posted
16 minutes ago, BillyBilliams said:

 

Mid December is a long time to wait for an ACL surgery.  I actually didn't know that.  I could have sworn it was within the first few days of Dec.  That means he took 10.5 months.  Which then is on track like you mentioned.

You usually wait at least three weeks to have the reconstruction to let the area be less inflamed. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

For a lay person with (from what you've said in various posts) no specialized medical or scientific training to be all "I stand by what I said" about RTP times, in the face of a published, peer reviewed, descriptive epidemiological study of position groups that would seem to present similar demands on the knee for pivoting on a planted foot in order to cut and change direction -

 

-  I don't get it, that's all.

 

 

 

I have no scientific knoweldge or training. But I am basing it on conversations with people who have. I am not just spitballing. I trust what they tell me. One is the Head of Medicine at a professional soccer club the other is an orthopedic surgeon at one of the top hospitals in London. Had the same conversation with them basically totally unrelated to each other but about modern ACL recovery rates for pro athletes. Now maybe the NFL is so sufficiently different that it renders those conversations irrelevant. But I see examples in the NFL in the last few years - Amari Rodgers and Chris Godwin to name two - that make me sceptical of that.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...