Big Turk Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) I did not realize until it was mentioned in the broadcast yesterday that Arrowhead(GEHA) is roughly the same age as HighMark stadium is. Why has there been no talk by the NFL on how KC needs a new stadium to remain competitive with the other NFL teams? Is there something about Arrowhead that makes it better than Highmark? Have there been any major renovations done to it that would make sense as to why they wouldn't receive the same type of criticism from the NFL? Just don't understand how the Bills have heard for years and years and years how they needed a new stadium to compete even coming from the Commissioner Goodell, but we have heard nothing about the Chiefs needing a new stadium for one that is pretty much the same age as ours. Thoughts? Edited October 17, 2022 by Big Turk Quote
Nextmanup Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 Just looking at it from above, it looks like it hasn't undergone hardly ANY renovations, unlike Rich Stadium. Maybe that's wrong, I have never been there. Quote
Solomon Grundy Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 It has more than one visitor bathroom and their drainage system works 😎 1 2 Quote
Big Turk Posted October 17, 2022 Author Posted October 17, 2022 @Zerovoltz any thoughts on this? Or anyone else that has been to both stadiums? Quote
Nextmanup Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 Renovations One of the entrances to the stadium On April 4, 2006, Jackson County voters approved a tax increase to finance municipal bonds to pay for $850 million in renovations to Arrowhead Stadium and nearby Kauffman Stadium.[31] Before the bond election, the NFL awarded the 49th Super Bowl in 2015 to Kansas City provided it would have a climate-controlled stadium. With the passing of the stadium bill, the Chiefs signed a new lease which ensures that the team will remain at Arrowhead until at least 2031.[32] However, a second bond issue to build the rolling roof shared with Kauffman Stadium that was part of the original 1967 stadium plan was defeated by voters, and Kansas City chose to withdraw its request to host Super Bowl XLIX in 2015; the game was played at the University of Phoenix Stadium (now State Farm Stadium) in Glendale, Arizona.[33] On August 15, 2007, the Chiefs announced final plans for the renovated Arrowhead Stadium, which would cost $375 million. The cost to the city was reduced by $50 million thanks to an additional payment by the Hunt family, which originally had intended to donate $75 million. The renovated stadium features the Chiefs Hall of Honor, a tribute to Lamar Hunt, and "horizon level" seating in which luxury suite owners sit outdoors.[34] Reconstruction for the stadiums started on October 3, 2007. Refurbishment of nearby Kauffman Stadium, home to the Kansas City Royals baseball team, commenced at that time, and both completely-refurbished stadiums were ready for play by the 2010 season.[35] In 2019, the Chiefs announced multiple renovations for the 2020 season, which included replaced seats in the lower level, a new video display on the East end, and locker room upgrades.[3 1 1 Quote
BillsfaninSB Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 I thought they were investigating a location for a new stadium. Quote
Logic Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, Big Turk said: I did not realize until it was mentioned in the broadcast yesterday that Arrowhead(GEHA) is roughly the same age as HighMark stadium is. Why has there bee no talk by the NFL on how KC needs a new stadium to remain competitive with the other NFL teams? Is there something about Arrowhead that makes it better than Highmark? Have there been any major renovations done to it that would make sense as to why they wouldn't receive the same type of criticism from the NFL? Just don't understand how the Bills have heard for years and years and years how they needed a new stadium to compete even coming from the Commissioner Goodell, but we have heard nothing about the Chiefs needing a new stadium for one that is pretty much the same age as ours. Thoughts? I've thought about this before. Lambeau, too. Is it strictly the fact that those stadiums are more "historic" than Highmark? I know Lambeau had extensive modernizations done, but you can't tell me that those modernizations brought the stadium up to par with the modern palaces that Goodell and co seem to prefer. Again, is it those stadiums' historic value that save their franchises from the "build a stadium or move!" mandates? Quote
Big Turk Posted October 17, 2022 Author Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Logic said: I've thought about this before. Lambeau, too. Is it strictly the fact that those stadiums are more "historic" than Highmark? I know Lambeau had extensive modernizations done, but you can't tell me that those modernizations brought the stadium up to par with the modern palaces that Goodell and co seem to prefer. Again, is it those stadiums' historic value that save their franchises from the "build a stadium or move!" mandates? I know Lambeau underwent extensive renovations maybe like 10 years ago, so I am not overly surprised by that one...I think maybe Lambeau might have had enough historical appeal that if the costs were close they would keep it instead of building a new one. How would the Chiefs stadium qualify tho? They were an AFL team like the Bills were. Edited October 17, 2022 by Big Turk Quote
plenzmd1 Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Logic said: I've thought about this before. Lambeau, too. Is it strictly the fact that those stadiums are more "historic" than Highmark? I know Lambeau had extensive modernizations done, but you can't tell me that those modernizations brought the stadium up to par with the modern palaces that Goodell and co seem to prefer. Again, is it those stadiums' historic value that save their franchises from the "build a stadium or move!" mandates? Both Lambeau and Arrowhead have had massive renovations....the current construction of the Bills stadium with the lower bowl below grade precludes that being done in Buffalo. Lambeau has all the comfort of a modern stadium with huge concourses, indoor club seating all around etc. Edited October 17, 2022 by plenzmd1 1 Quote
BillsfaninSB Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 https://www.si.com/nfl/chiefs/.amp/gm-report/missouri-to-kansas-for-the-kc-chiefs-geha-field-at-arrowhead-stadium-could-be-on-the-move 1 Quote
Big Turk Posted October 17, 2022 Author Posted October 17, 2022 3 minutes ago, Nextmanup said: Renovations One of the entrances to the stadium On April 4, 2006, Jackson County voters approved a tax increase to finance municipal bonds to pay for $850 million in renovations to Arrowhead Stadium and nearby Kauffman Stadium.[31] Before the bond election, the NFL awarded the 49th Super Bowl in 2015 to Kansas City provided it would have a climate-controlled stadium. With the passing of the stadium bill, the Chiefs signed a new lease which ensures that the team will remain at Arrowhead until at least 2031.[32] However, a second bond issue to build the rolling roof shared with Kauffman Stadium that was part of the original 1967 stadium plan was defeated by voters, and Kansas City chose to withdraw its request to host Super Bowl XLIX in 2015; the game was played at the University of Phoenix Stadium (now State Farm Stadium) in Glendale, Arizona.[33] On August 15, 2007, the Chiefs announced final plans for the renovated Arrowhead Stadium, which would cost $375 million. The cost to the city was reduced by $50 million thanks to an additional payment by the Hunt family, which originally had intended to donate $75 million. The renovated stadium features the Chiefs Hall of Honor, a tribute to Lamar Hunt, and "horizon level" seating in which luxury suite owners sit outdoors.[34] Reconstruction for the stadiums started on October 3, 2007. Refurbishment of nearby Kauffman Stadium, home to the Kansas City Royals baseball team, commenced at that time, and both completely-refurbished stadiums were ready for play by the 2010 season.[35] In 2019, the Chiefs announced multiple renovations for the 2020 season, which included replaced seats in the lower level, a new video display on the East end, and locker room upgrades.[3 Well that makes sense then...seems they did more modernization work than the Bills did... Also seems like maybe some of the Bills stuff that needed to be done wasn't really feasible... Quote
mrags Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 Pretty sure the Chiefs had serious multi minion dollar renovations years ago that fixed many of their issues. Had Buffalo not skimped on their smaller renovation jobs the past few times, they likely would be able to keep the stadium. At the time when the Chiefs made the renovations it would have been significant. 1 Quote
Albany,n.y. Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 I'm guessing the upper deck in KC isn't on the verge of becoming a death trap. 1 1 Quote
scuba guy Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 56 minutes ago, BillsfaninSB said: I thought they were investigating a location for a new stadium. They have if you look at a map the new stadium proposed site is acrossed the pond from the other stadium and actual sits in mo sister state to mo re Kansas so giving this and the tax laws the state of MO and Kansas city have to find an alternative. More likely to build it in KS and have founding maybe from both states Quote
Ralonzo Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 Because it's an "historical" "classic" "landmark" from the 70's. However, the 70's also brought us this: 1 Quote
May Day 10 Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 As mentioned, it had an extensive renovation, as did Lambeau and Soldier Field. In 2 of those cases, there has been calls for a new facility. I see tennessee is going to build one to replace a 23 year old facility too. As much as I love Rich Stadium... building anew is the right play. the costs are fairly comparable. In the event of a renovation, the calls for a new stadium would/could be renewed in 10, 15, 20 years. Or at least more likely than a new stadium. Quote
stevewin Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Solomon Grundy said: It has more than one visitor bathroom and their drainage system works 😎 Urinal sinks abound 1 Quote
Big Turk Posted October 17, 2022 Author Posted October 17, 2022 1 minute ago, May Day 10 said: As mentioned, it had an extensive renovation, as did Lambeau and Soldier Field. In 2 of those cases, there has been calls for a new facility. I see tennessee is going to build one to replace a 23 year old facility too. As much as I love Rich Stadium... building anew is the right play. the costs are fairly comparable. In the event of a renovation, the calls for a new stadium would/could be renewed in 10, 15, 20 years. Or at least more likely than a new stadium. Going to miss our unique swirling winds at one end of the stadium that doesn't exist anywhere else in the NFL tho... Quote
wjag Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) I heard that last night too and was surprised. Then I saw McDermott crammed into a nook trying to address the team and I thought, SSDC -- same stadium, different city. Edited October 17, 2022 by wjag Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted October 17, 2022 Posted October 17, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Big Turk said: I did not realize until it was mentioned in the broadcast yesterday that Arrowhead(GEHA) is roughly the same age as HighMark stadium is. Why has there been no talk by the NFL on how KC needs a new stadium to remain competitive with the other NFL teams? Is there something about Arrowhead that makes it better than Highmark? Have there been any major renovations done to it that would make sense as to why they wouldn't receive the same type of criticism from the NFL? Just don't understand how the Bills have heard for years and years and years how they needed a new stadium to compete even coming from the Commissioner Goodell, but we have heard nothing about the Chiefs needing a new stadium for one that is pretty much the same age as ours. Thoughts? For one, GEHA/Arrowhead's upper decks aren't in danger of collapsing. 10 minutes ago, May Day 10 said: As mentioned, it had an extensive renovation, as did Lambeau and Soldier Field. In 2 of those cases, there has been calls for a new facility. I see tennessee is going to build one to replace a 23 year old facility too. As much as I love Rich Stadium... building anew is the right play. the costs are fairly comparable. In the event of a renovation, the calls for a new stadium would/could be renewed in 10, 15, 20 years. Or at least more likely than a new stadium. For the one-hundredth time... Soldier Field was not renovated. They built an entire NEW stadium inside the classic Roman column gateways. It would be like demolishing Highmark, building a totally new stadium, but leaving up the old entrance gates, then calling it a renovation. Edited October 17, 2022 by PromoTheRobot 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.