Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Awwufelloff said:

Depth at oline is more important than a guy coming off a bad ACL injury for a few weeks. Protecting Allen is that important. 

I'd argue that the Bills already have better depth at O-Line than the majority of the league, just not the top end talent, but that's really besides the point that I already made.  Teams don't trade O-Lineman midseason, so your idea of "well just get an O-Lineman" is a non-starter.  

 

The guys on the street aren't better than what we already have at O-Line depth.  If they were, teams wouldn't be picking JAGs like Luke Tenuta off the practice squad.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, Awwufelloff said:

Depth at oline is more important than a guy coming off a bad ACL injury for a few weeks. Protecting Allen is that important. 

OL players don't grow on trees and if anyone had watched the NFL, it is a need for every team with the possible exception of 1 to 2. The ones that would be available via trade will either be due for some serious cash or they are a bottom feeder that is a slight upgrade from your guy in the trash can...

 

I think everyone knows that keeping allen upright in a clean pocket and better run blocking would do absolute miracles for our already great offense

Edited by Reed83HOF
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Bruffalo said:

Find one who is on the trading block who would be an upgrade from what we have.

 

Hint: It doesn't exist.  You might as well say you want them to sign a unicorn. 

 

Lol....Pegasus would be better signing

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, babulator said:

I call BS. This is not how Beane does business.

I don't know, an incentive laden deal for a talented player looking to bounce back from injury sounds familiar...

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, transient said:

I don't know, an incentive laden deal for a talented player looking to bounce back from injury sounds familiar...

Beane would not agree to anything until we know what we're getting. I think any deal OBJ signs will be incentive laden, no real shocker there.  Has he even done any running yet? This is pure speculation.

 

BS.

Posted
1 minute ago, DallasBillsFan1 said:

Can someone explain why OBJ?  A possible third threat?  I guess.  Maybe because McKenzie had a bad game?  Seems our WR room is deep.  Akers I can understand.

 

Ultra elite talent if healthy. 

 

Remember Moss going to Pats? 

 

This has potential to be iconic. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, babulator said:

Beane would not agree to anything until we know what we're getting. I think any deal OBJ signs will be incentive laden, no real shocker there.  Has he even done any running yet? This is pure speculation.

 

BS.

I'm not saying this is or isn't true, but every player has to pass a physical before executing a contract, and there would likely be contingencies/offsets in the language given the injury he's coming off of. If OBJ is healthy he's going to play somewhere, why is it so hard to believe that someone would have an tentative agreement in place beforehand?

  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...