Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
49 minutes ago, Inigo Montoya said:

There are a few things that we haven't seen a lot of so far in Ken Dorsey's offense and I wonder if he is still just developing his playbook, or if he has deliberately kept some things close to the vest for this game versus the Chiefs this week so he can put some looks on the field that the Chiefs defense might be less prepared for.   Some of the things that we haven't seen a lot of, or any or this year on offense are;

 

Pre snap motion

Jet Sweeps

Empty backfield sets

Singletary and Cooks behind  / flanking Allen

Frequent screen passes

 

Going empty backfield and spreading out (pick your favorite five)  Diggs / Davis / Shakir / McKenzie / Singletary / Knox would be a nightmare for a defense to cover.  Shakir or McKenzie rocketing back into the backfield in motion and faking the pitch or actually taking the pitch from Allen with a full head of steam.   Moving Diggs all over the field before the snap to expose the defense and cause miss matches.  These are some of the things I hope we see more of on Sunday


I love all of these ideas and would not be surprised if they were saving some of the playbook specifically for KC or later in the season.  The Bills, perhaps more than other teams, seem to be playing the long game

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Watching the Chiefs Raiders game last night, you could see the Chiefs Off and Def adjusting as the game went on.  They definitely used the plays that worked, (Kelsey TDs) but they kept trying different plays/defenses to keep the raiders off balance. 

 

Whatever "wrinkles" Dorsey has in mind, he needs to keep changing up throughout the game.  But then there is Allen, who can change up things on the fly.  

 

Our defense is what needs to adapt as the game progresses.

  • Agree 1
Posted

The only thing I see them changing this weekend is establishing more ball control.  We've been great so far in this regard but really, really, really have to avoid 3 and outs.  Las Vegas succeeded in the first half by keeping the ball out of Mahomes' hands.  

Posted
49 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:

It’s all about the blocking upfront.  Chris Jones steals souls from weak guards and we have two of them - need to account for 95 on every play.


Is he better than that guy we played in week 1 from LA? 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, LeviF said:

Wrinkles? The *****in raiders hung 30 on that defense. 

 

Unfortunately for the Raiders their *****in coach took a point off the wall, so they only hung 29

 

21 minutes ago, CSBill said:


Is he better than that guy we played in week 1 from LA? 

 

No.  No, he is not.  Good, though!

Edited by Beck Water
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

There's a lot of things I'd love to see on Sunday. One of them is, weirdly, Gilliam getting a bunch of snaps. Does well with run blocking, and he's a sneaky good receiving option.

 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Rubes said:

There's a lot of things I'd love to see on Sunday. One of them is, weirdly, Gilliam getting a bunch of snaps. Does well with run blocking, and he's a sneaky good receiving option.

 

I still don’t understand why he’s not our third and a yard back

  • Agree 2
Posted
3 hours ago, SectionC3 said:

He is their game wrecker.  Couldn’t agree more.  He gets the Aaron Donald attention from us this week. 

Yes we have to double Jones and I'm sure we will. It's how we react to the blitzes that will determine the outcome. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 hours ago, henry jones said:

The only thing I see them changing this weekend is establishing more ball control.  We've been great so far in this regard but really, really, really have to avoid 3 and outs.  Las Vegas succeeded in the first half by keeping the ball out of Mahomes' hands.  

Bills have ( or had) the best 3rd down % in the league on offense as of last week. They should be fine in that dept.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Inigo Montoya said:

There are a few things that we haven't seen a lot of so far in Ken Dorsey's offense and I wonder if he is still just developing his playbook, or if he has deliberately kept some things close to the vest for this game versus the Chiefs this week so he can put some looks on the field that the Chiefs defense might be less prepared for.   Some of the things that we haven't seen a lot of, or any or this year on offense are;

 

Pre snap motion

Jet Sweeps

Empty backfield sets

Singletary and Cooks behind  / flanking Allen

Frequent screen passes

 

Going empty backfield and spreading out (pick your favorite five)  Diggs / Davis / Shakir / McKenzie / Singletary / Knox would be a nightmare for a defense to cover.  Shakir or McKenzie rocketing back into the backfield in motion and faking the pitch or actually taking the pitch from Allen with a full head of steam.   Moving Diggs all over the field before the snap to expose the defense and cause miss matches.  These are some of the things I hope we see more of on Sunday

I think Josh is playing at a great level and will do his thing to score against the chiefs.  My biggest concern for Sunday's battle will be -  How are we going to stop Kelce.  He is coming off a 4-TD monster game;  who is going to cover him.   Will Edmunds be back in time from his injury?

Posted
2 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I still don’t understand why he’s not our third and a yard back


I remember reading somewhere that Gilliam was asked to do more on special teams this week because a number of the younger guys who usually play special teams were forced into regular roles. So they needed Gilliam more for special teams this time.

 

As we get guys back, Gilliam can get back into the offensive game plan. I really think he is more versatile than we think and really sneaky good.

 

35 minutes ago, ganesh said:

I think Josh is playing at a great level and will do his thing to score against the chiefs.  My biggest concern for Sunday's battle will be -  How are we going to stop Kelce.  He is coming off a 4-TD monster game;  who is going to cover him.   Will Edmunds be back in time from his injury?


He definitely had a great game with the 4 TDs, though at the same time he had like 7 catches for only something like 27 total yards. He was great in the red zone for sure, but the Raiders didn’t let him do much else. (Like it mattered, but still…)

 

  • Agree 2
Posted
4 hours ago, atlbillsfan1975 said:

I don’t think so. The Raiders blocking scheme strength appears to be the weakness for the Bills. The Bills aren’t straight ahead power blockers, they rely more on pin and pull style. This is in large part to the Bills have good athletes along the oline who are agile and mobile. 
Hoping the Bills just do what they do,
there isn’t a defensive scheme that can slow down this offense when they aren’t shooting themselves in the foot. 

 

THIS is exactly what I hope Dorsey and Kromer keep working towards. It's how they finally hit their stride on offense last season, and I suspect, despite Roger Saffold's fairly zone-reliant scheme fit, that this unit is already discovering that ain't ***** changed. The current OL personnel (minus the LG) excel when NOT running the wide zone scheme McD has been seeking since he was hired. And again, conversely, we're seeing that what they CAN execute are gap/power/pin-n-pull concepts. And luckily, they have the organizational mindset to abandon preferences in favor of results. 

 

I hope they keep moving away from zone for now, in favor of what they do well. 

Posted

We have seen plenty of screen passes. Not sure what you are watching.

4 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:

It’s all about the blocking upfront.  Chris Jones steals souls from weak guards and we have two of them - need to account for 95 on every play.

 

And the one team we beat them.... #95 didn't play.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted
5 hours ago, Inigo Montoya said:

There are a few things that we haven't seen a lot of so far in Ken Dorsey's offense and I wonder if he is still just developing his playbook, or if he has deliberately kept some things close to the vest for this game versus the Chiefs this week so he can put some looks on the field that the Chiefs defense might be less prepared for.   Some of the things that we haven't seen a lot of, or any or this year on offense are;

 

Pre snap motion

Jet Sweeps

Empty backfield sets

Singletary and Cooks behind  / flanking Allen

Frequent screen passes

 

Going empty backfield and spreading out (pick your favorite five)  Diggs / Davis / Shakir / McKenzie / Singletary / Knox would be a nightmare for a defense to cover.  Shakir or McKenzie rocketing back into the backfield in motion and faking the pitch or actually taking the pitch from Allen with a full head of steam.   Moving Diggs all over the field before the snap to expose the defense and cause miss matches.  These are some of the things I hope we see more of on Sunday


they throw screens quite a bit this year. Not sure what you’re talking about

4 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

We have seen plenty of screen passes. Not sure what you are watching.

 

And the one team we beat them.... #95 didn't play.


lol mind meld gunny

Posted
9 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:

It’s all about the blocking upfront.  Chris Jones steals souls from weak guards and we have two of them - need to account for 95 on every play.

The guards have faced better d-linemen than Jones already. The guards have been “ok” so far. Jones is a problem, but the bigger issue is the Chiefs appear to have solid d-line depth like Buffalo. Bills haven’t faced a team yet besides maybe Miami who have several capable d-linemen. 
 

Posted
10 hours ago, Lost said:

 

I hope McD doesn't think we're gonna go in there and replicated the same output with Moss

I mean Randy worked well for TB12, we should give him a shot to stick on this roster. 

6 hours ago, ganesh said:

I think Josh is playing at a great level and will do his thing to score against the chiefs.  My biggest concern for Sunday's battle will be -  How are we going to stop Kelce.  He is coming off a 4-TD monster game;  who is going to cover him.   Will Edmunds be back in time from his injury?

Maybe just cover him unlike what the Raiders did?

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...