Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Shaw66 said:

I agree.   It was not a ball I wanted him trying to catch.  

The wind has been unusually difficult there for the past two years.  Even on quieter days it’s tough for returners there.  Had a couple of muffs in the blue and white scrimmages in the past two years.  Titans has guys dropping all sorts of stuff in warmups before MNF this year.  And that Shakir situation has the ball moving all over the place. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Beck Water said:

 

So you’re concluding this from basically 55 snaps running with the 1s in 2 games, in which he saw 7 targets?  And another 24 snaps from garbage time?

 

I think Shakir shows every promise of being a solid WR in the NFL, and maybe a very good one.  But all that stuff about “has found open space more consistently” blah blah based on a very small sample size, is IMO “projecting” your own biases and beliefs onto what you see.

 

It’s like the people who are alleging Bernard is so much better than Dodson based on like 41 snaps in “clean up time”.  He may become that, but you really can’t tell that he is right now.

Look, everyone has an opinion.  I stated mine.  

 

All you've said here is that my opinion is wrong because I don't have enough data.   So, when my opinion after one preseason game that Josh Allen was the franchise quarterback was wrong because I only saw 20 snaps?   Your opinion is that EVERY veteran is better than EVERY rookie simply because he's a veteran?   That makes no sense.  

 

I've watched McKenzie drop balls long enough to know that he is not a first-rate receiver.   He was on the bench behind Beasley for a reason.  The Bills signed Crowder for a reason.   They drafted Shakir for a reason.  I've got more data than I need to think Shakir should be the slot guy.  

 

You can have your opinion.   I might be wrong.  But you can't prove that you're right, so I don't see why you need to argue as though I'm an idiot.  

Posted

Never really heard is Crowder on season ending IR or is he eligible to come back in 4 weeks?  With the rules today, maybe no such thing as season ending IR??

 

Overall think McKenzie will likely start when healthy until Shakir shows much more.  Even then look at how the Bills handled Brown and Sanders last two years. As long as they were healthy, they started, but the backups tended to play as much if not more.

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, Logic said:

I know, I know -- it's early, and you'll say I'm jumping the gun.

I don't care. I've seen enough: Khalil Shakir should be the starting slot receiver going forward, even when McKenzie and Crowder return to full health.

At the very least, he should be splitting reps with McKenzie and seeing more playing time than Jamison Crowder.

He runs great routes. He constantly seems to get open. He has relatively sure hands (one bad concentration drop yesterday not withstanding). He offers run-after-catch ability that this offense often lacks. He has the frame and build to withstand the tough over-the-middle work. 

Aside from all of that, he just passes the eyeball test in a way that the Bills' other two slot options do not. Frankly, he looks like a star in the making.

I love McKenzie as a player and am glad he's on the roster, but has he looked like a dynamic full time slot option to anyone over the first four games? He hasn't looked that way to me. I like Crowder, too. He's a solid, dependable veteran depth option. Again, though: he doesn't seem to pop off the screen the way Shakir was.

I have figured all along that Shakir would be brought along slowly, that he'd be more of a contender for starting duties in 2023 or 2024. Given McDermott's M.O., that still may happen. I don't think it should, though. I've seen enough. He's the best option to start in the slot. The coaches always preach getting the best players on the field, regardless of tenure or pedigree. If they're true to their word, Shakir should start seeing more opportunities. I hope he does.

 

 

I really do love Shakir.

 

But McKenzie and Crowder are plenty good also. 

 

I want to see him more consistently, but I don't have any particular urge to see him ahead of the other two, especially early in the year.

 

And for people criticizing McKenzie's hands, I just don't see it. The guy had 30 catches on 34 targets in 2020, 20 catches on 26 targets in 2021 and has 15 catches on 21 targets this year, including the one Josh bounced to him at the goal line. Are some of those easy one foot throws on jet sweeps? Yeah. But not all and I don't think most. He doesn't miss a lot.

 

Shakir has 5 catches on 9 targets. Not saying that's bad. He has good hands, but so does McKenzie.

Edited by Thurman#1
  • Agree 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Thurman#1 said:

I really do love Shakir. 

 

But McKenzie and Crowder are plenty good also. 

 

I want to see him more consistently, but I don't have any particular urge to see him ahead of the other two, especially early in the year.

 

Did the Bills put Crowder on IR-return?  If not, his season and probably time with the Bills is over. 

Posted
11 hours ago, yall said:

I don't even know that this is such a hot take.

 

Kid is good. Play him.

This. What do we stand to lose? Missing out on 2 catches 18 yards?

Stand to gain? A lot

 

Risk/reward so heavily favors this kid. I've seen nothing out of the slot until Sunday

  • Agree 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, BillsShredder83 said:

This. What do we stand to lose? Missing out on 2 catches 18 yards?

Stand to gain? A lot

 

Risk/reward so heavily favors this kid. I've seen nothing out of the slot until Sunday

 

 

Nothing out of the slot?

 

McKenzie and Crowder have totalled 213 yards, 3 TDs and 13 1st downs. On 34 targets. Those are solid numbers for slot.

 

Posted
4 hours ago, finn said:

That's interesting. Are you thinking of his Reed-like glide, upright posture, soft hands, and deceptive speed?

 

All of it, including the penchant of YAC.

 

When I watch him it feels like if. he was wearing 83, I'm not sure I could tell the difference.

Posted
1 minute ago, NickelCity said:

 

Just wild that Josh throws that ball. 

 

It is arm arrogance... and perhaps not the right decision...

 

Diggs is way more open...

 

But.. he got the result so its hard to argue..

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

The one thing that should be recognised here is that all those people who pushed back so hard on "he really isn't an outside receiver in the NFL he is a slot who can play the odd snap out there" should come and take their L now. 

 

Shakir is going to be a very fine slot receiver in this league. That is what he is.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

The one thing that should be recognised here is that all those people who pushed back so hard on "he really isn't an outside receiver in the NFL he is a slot who can play the odd snap out there" should come and take their L now. 

 

Shakir is going to be a very fine slot receiver in this league. That is what he is.

I mean slot WR is where there is an opening on the roster.

Posted
14 hours ago, Shaw66 said:

Look, everyone has an opinion.  I stated mine.  

 

All you've said here is that my opinion is wrong because I don't have enough data.   So, when my opinion after one preseason game that Josh Allen was the franchise quarterback was wrong because I only saw 20 snaps?   Your opinion is that EVERY veteran is better than EVERY rookie simply because he's a veteran?   That makes no sense.  

 

I've watched McKenzie drop balls long enough to know that he is not a first-rate receiver.   He was on the bench behind Beasley for a reason.  The Bills signed Crowder for a reason.   They drafted Shakir for a reason.  I've got more data than I need to think Shakir should be the slot guy.  

 

You can have your opinion.   I might be wrong.  But you can't prove that you're right, so I don't see why you need to argue as though I'm an idiot.  

Shaw, I think the point is that your (and several others) opinions are highly speculative. There really isn't enough of a sample size to simply state that Shakir is demonstratively better than McKenzie. And using recent stats as "proof" really looks like confirmation bias when there are other games in which McKenzie has better numbers. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...