Finding an alternative to Case Keenum

[Virgil]

Just because your friends offer you another beer doesn’t mean you have to drink it 

[TPS]

Just now, Einstein said:

 

Its just a conversation man.

With all due respect for the former poster from DC, “You’re an idiot”.

[UKBillFan]

I guess we could try brining in Minshew, Dalton or Lock but why would we bother?

 

[Malazan]

2 minutes ago, Simon said:

Yes.

Hover over the user's name and you'll have the wonderful option of selecting "Ignore"

 

If 99% of the board has to ignore someone.. maybe just save them the trouble?

[Nextmanup]

6 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

 

Not really but he has won some games on other teams.  Bills arent going to be looking for a replacement this year.  Im not too worried about Josh going out either.  He's a big boy and he's a gamer.

 

But my god man.  Why do you do this every week?  We just dominated and yet here you are again first thing you do is start a what if negative thread.  FFS how do you not know why people think you are negative... you are.

And your post is not negative?

 

 

[LABILLBACKER]

I don't know where and when we start shopping but Keenum is awful. Worse than Trubisky. 

[Einstein]

2 minutes ago, TPS said:

With all due respect for the former poster from DC, “You’re an idiot”.

 

I guess people don’t like this topic. I thought it was interesting topic.

 

Just ignore the thread and it’ll be pushed down the list of threads.

[GunnerBill]

In fairness to Einstein and I have always liked Keenum.... I am a tad concerned. 

 

But we did pull all the starters around him. That is worth considering

[Simon]

1 minute ago, Malazan said:

 

If 99% of the board has to ignore someone.. maybe just save them the trouble?

 

I'm not down with the whole stifling unpopular speech thing. 🤷‍♂️

[Ya Digg?]

Why do you insist on going with Einstein as your handle? I have never once read something you wrote and thought of it being genius level …stop dirtying the actual Einstein’s name!!!

[Saxum]

11 minutes ago, Rochesterfan said:

Ahh - look who had a thought - must be time for a thread.

 

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

 

I did not see a thought posted even when I unignored post.

[Einstein]

1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:

In fairness to Einstein and I have always liked Keenum.... I am a tad concerned. 

 

But we did pull all the starters around him. That is worth considering

 

Thank you sir.

[Scott7975]

1 minute ago, Nextmanup said:

And your post is not negative?

 

 

 

I dont think so.  Is it?

[Coach Tuesday]

Possibly the Ed Wood of TSW posters.  I suspect that long after you are gone, we’ll be taking about that rare, elite talent for creating horrible threads.  We may never see something like this again.

[HOUSE]

Yawn 

[Scott7975]

3 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

I guess people don’t like this topic. I thought it was interesting topic.

 

Just ignore the thread and it’ll be pushed down the list of threads.

 

I mean, the topic itself is fine but you choose this specific negative topic after we just blew out Pitts.  Like why?  Can't you celebrate a little?  Your first thought to post is this.

[Malazan]

5 minutes ago, Simon said:

I'm not down with the whole stifling unpopular speech thing. 🤷‍♂️

 

It stifles the ability to find speech that is worthwhile and not garbage that is as see through as the emperor's new clothes from certain posters. 

Edited October 9, 2022 by Malazan

[Yawning Frog]

5 minutes ago, Einstein said:

 

I guess people don’t like this topic. I thought it was interesting topic.

 

Just ignore the thread and it’ll be pushed down the list of threads.

Thank god

[Simon]

1 minute ago, Malazan said:

 

maybe if your reconsidered, we wouldn't lose the quality people posting actual football content 

 

Who have we lost this year?

 

 

[Malazan]

1 minute ago, Simon said:

Who have we lost this year?

 

Can't believe you already forgot the one mod we had