Solomon Grundy Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 24 minutes ago, SCBills said: Green Bay is my guess, but the Vikings and Bears trading for weapons today wasn’t exactly on my bingo card. Giants Quote
SCBills Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said: It's so hard to upgrade mid-season though. Bad teams usually have bad offensive linemen. And the ones who have good ones want to keep them to properly evaluate their QB situation. 1 Quote
ALLinALLEN Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, Solomon Grundy said: Giants I like that more. I dont see a 3-5 packers team with that many holes trading away valuable draft picks for a rental WR. NYG makes much more sense. Quote
Warriorspikes51 Posted November 1, 2022 Author Posted November 1, 2022 I'll part with a 3rd for Jacobs. He's only 24 1 1 1 Quote
DapperCam Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 Save the picks, save the cap. We are going to contend for the next 5 years at least. There is too much luck involved (single elimination playoffs) to go all in on one year unless you think it is your last year to make a run (like if you have a super old franchise QB). 1 1 Quote
newcam2012 Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 9 minutes ago, LOVEMESOMEBILLS said: I don't think we are in real need at RB, but I'd give up a 3rd for Jacobs. The offense becomes so much harder to defend with a guy like Jacobs in the backfield. He'd get teams to bring their safeties in closer, allowing for bigger pass plays, more often. He'd be the only RB out there I would make trade for. I'd absolutely take Jacobs for a 3rd. I just don't see anything that indicates the Raiders would do that. Why would they get rid of their best RB for a 3rd? That rounder next year likely had little impact on improving the Raiders. 1 Quote
HOUSE Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 My father always told me that people who wait to the last minute always **** everything up 1 1 Quote
ColoradoBills Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 6 minutes ago, ddaryl said: Pretty sure Beane already has his 2023 salary cap board all sorted out and knows what needs to be done, and my gut tells me there is not as much wiggle room and some think. More money is going to flow but there will still be some tough decisions and some upset fans when the ax has to fall. Of course he does. Everything isn't chiseled in stone, but he knows what the options are. 1 Quote
NewEra Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 I think everyone would part with a 3rd for Jacobs….. Too bad the raiders won’t part with Jacobs for a 3rd. jmo- gonna cost more 1 Quote
Low Positive Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 1 minute ago, newcam2012 said: I'd absolutely take Jacobs for a 3rd. I just don't see anything that indicates the Raiders would do that. Why would they get rid of their best RB for a 3rd? That rounder next year likely had little impact on improving the Raiders. If they had any intention of keeping him they would have picked up his 5th year option in April. They did not. Quote
freddyjj Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 1 minute ago, HOUSE said: My father always told me that people who wait to the last minute always **** everything up (sarcasm alert) Did he say this on his deathbed? 1 Quote
NewEra Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 Just now, FrenchConnection said: If they had any intention of keeping him they would have picked up his 5th year option in April. They did not. And if they let him go, they’ll get a 3rd rd comp pick. He was a different RB when they declined his option. He’s MUCH better right now. How long will this new Jacobs last? 🤷🏻♂️ Quote
Bleeding Bills Blue Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 8 minutes ago, SCBills said: And the ones who have good ones want to keep them to properly evaluate their QB situation. They're hard to find... its why teams are taking shots at cody ford's. I know what i have is not good, maybe the bills castoff has some valuable football in him. Quote
BuffaloRebound Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 1 minute ago, newcam2012 said: I'd absolutely take Jacobs for a 3rd. I just don't see anything that indicates the Raiders would do that. Why would they get rid of their best RB for a 3rd? That rounder next year likely had little impact on improving the Raiders. because they declined his 5th year option which means it’s 99% likely he ain’t coming back next year and they’re 2-5 in a division with the Chiefs. 1 Quote
PetermansRedemption Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, HappyDays said: A lot of teams trying to be buyers and sellers at the same time this year. Quote
stinky finger Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 21 minutes ago, teef said: i'm feeling a hint of anger. embrace it - it’s ok if it festers too Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.