Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
44 minutes ago, Bob in STL said:

I don't know how I missed your attempt at humor.  Your 4-1-4 nine-man defense that includes a guy on IR is hilarious.  

It was a 4-1-6 scheme. 4 D lineman, 1 linebacker (not named Edmunds), 4 cornerbacks, 2 safeties with one who is on IR but is so good he could create a hologram of himself and suit up against Kansas City. 

Posted (edited)

CB1 Tre

CB2 Elam

CB3 Dane

CB4 Benford (Eventually transitioning to a starting Safety next year)

 

 

 

Edited by SCBills
Posted

While I think it’s a little different with CB, just rotate them like our DL until Tre gets his sea legs. They all have shown they are worthy of snaps. Keep them fresh for 4 quarters and the post season. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
3 hours ago, JerseyBills said:

If so, I think we should trade him if we can get solid compensation from a team thin at CB. Benford looked great when healthy. 

Dane is playing just as well overall 

I wouldn’t risk another corner injury derailing the season…especially now that we’re missing hyde 

Posted

Which ever spot the team chooses him to do when he comes back healthy he is our best corner

 

It doesn’t really matter though it is said that your secondary is only as good as the worst corner you have out there teams run spread formations everybody’s going to get a lot of work

Posted

CB1 - White

CB2- Dane

NKL - Johnson

Safety's Poyer and Benford

 

Next year switch out Dane for Elam. But after the bye this year I'd love to see this line-up.  Move Benford to Safety so both can get on the field, Benford would be an upgrade to Hamilin. Leave Dane as the starter for now for the experience he gives us. This year Elam would be second string.

Posted

Tre is the #1 corner. The rest of the guys file in behind him in whatever order the coaches decide. I'm guessing Jackson and Elam will split time. Benford is hurt and won't be rushed back.

21 minutes ago, mikef272002 said:

CB1 - White

CB2- Dane

NKL - Johnson

Safety's Poyer and Benford

 

Next year switch out Dane for Elam. But after the bye this year I'd love to see this line-up.  Move Benford to Safety so both can get on the field, Benford would be an upgrade to Hamilin. Leave Dane as the starter for now for the experience he gives us. This year Elam would be second string.

If Benford transitions to safety it won't be mid-season.

Posted

fantastic issue to have.  My guess is that Tre will be on a short leash conditioning wise.  If he gets beat 1 or 2 times, the other guys go back in.  Not saying Tre won't be ready, but there is no need to rush him back.  1/2 game platoon with Jackson or Elam at first?  Can you do a corner rotation?  Imagine having a fresh CB each 1/2 of the game that is playing at an all-pro level.  We appear to have that.  (does a CB need to get in a rhythm?)  

Posted

Tre works his way back in at LCB.

 

Looking forward, it's Dane Jackson's future that is very murky.  How much are the Bills willing to pay him next season?

 

He's a RFA next year and there is no way he stays on the Bills for an "original round (7th) tender".  Multiple teams will give him offers.

The Bills could match whatever that cost is but will they with Elam and Benford needing to play.

 

Putting a 2nd round tender on him probably ensures he stay but it's a one-year deal at $4.3M.  Once again, is that too much for depth if

Elam and/or Benford can play.  He would be an UFA the following year and most likely moves on anyway.

 

Neither choice is great for the bottom-line Bills point of view.   I really like Dane but it's going to be a numbers thing next season.

It's a slim chance, but he may be a "tradeable" asset by the deadline.  If not, I think the Bills end up losing him for a 7th in 2024.

 

 

Posted

If we haven’t figured it out it’s a week to week thing right now. Never know who will be available or ready given how things have been. 
As my dad loves to say.. “We’ll cross that bridge when we get to it” 

Posted (edited)

CB 1  Tre
CB 2  Dane / Elam rotation
CB 3  Xavier Rhodes, Benford

 

Nickel  Taron, Benford, Neal 


SS  Poyer, Jaquan
FS  Hamlin, Benford 

4 hours ago, mikef272002 said:

CB1 - White

CB2- Dane

NKL - Johnson

Safety's Poyer and Benford

 

Next year switch out Dane for Elam. But after the bye this year I'd love to see this line-up.  Move Benford to Safety so both can get on the field, Benford would be an upgrade to Hamilin. Leave Dane as the starter for now for the experience he gives us. This year Elam would be second string.


I suppose Benford could be an upgrade to Hamlin.....except Poyer spoke very highly of Hamlin and how much time they've spent together off the field.

Edited by Warriorspikes51
Posted
8 hours ago, JerseyBills said:

Very true but with the emergence of Benford,  it'll be a shame to have 2 starting quality CBs on the bench.

 

We also have Rhodes as depth

rhodes isnt on the team. i expect the defensive backfield to see plenty of rotation even with white healthy

Posted

i don't know that he plays as a starter.

 

the Bills have been doing some interesting things at CB. especially when Benford was playing. it was CB by commitee. Benford would be in at times which calls for more of a zone coverage and short situations while elam was in for man and open field zones.

Posted

Starting RCB, like always.

Dane, Kaiir, and Benford have a bunkhouse brawl/steel cage/Judy Bagwell on a pole death match to determine the starter at LCB. 

Simple.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...