Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bob in STL said:

As a former center I think I do.  LOL 

 

They had an issue on another under snap prior to that where Allen fumbled the ball after not getting it cleanly as well. Considering it was the backup center and Allen having no issues with Morse, I'd say it's probably on Van Roten and butt sweat

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Bob in STL said:

As a former center I think I do.  LOL 

 

Even as a former center "blame the QB!" LOL I would think fairness would compell you to watch that exchange from the different angles available before making your pronouncement, but You Do You

Posted
33 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

I'm not so clear on that.  When there's a problem with the C QB exchange, you don't know which side it's on usually.

They had a ref or nfl rules official on one of the shows on wgr that said even if he muffed the snap a bit, as long as he didn't drop the ball, the refs normally call it a clean snap and he could have spiked it.

 

That also would have been a judgement call on the ref though so allen knew that it could have been ruled against them and didn't risk it. 

 

It was a good discussion. I'll see if I can find it. 

 

Posted

I obviously see the Bills as being favorites, but 14 points in an NFL game is A LOT! 

 

I realize we generally lose small or win BIG, but that is a mighty big favorite!  I’ll take a W, any way we can get it. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Augie said:

I obviously see the Bills as being favorites, but 14 points in an NFL game is A LOT! 

 

I realize we generally lose small or win BIG, but that is a mighty big favorite!  I’ll take a W, any way we can get it. 

The blowouts are better for my nails.

 

That chiefs game last year left me with bloody fingertips.

Posted
1 minute ago, The Wiz said:

The blowouts are better for my nails.

 

That chiefs game last year left me with bloody fingertips.

 

I’ve given up on nails, and should probably think about getting on a list for a new liver. 

  • Haha (+1) 4
Posted
11 hours ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Anything, ANYTHING to keep the doomerism going.

 

 

Really? And anything to keep being a blind homer ignoring all injuries and no attempt to add any personal insight. . Point out one fact I Misstated!  Now with knox, poyer , edmunds all being out as well , you still think it’s an easy game? Such astute analysis on your part!  Plus I didn’t say we would lose, so your comprehension is still lacking  any credibility. When is it keeping doom going  , saying we would probably win , but not by a 14 point speed that’s being touted.
 

 Go ahead tho and keep proving how people are sheep and blindly lead. It’s guys like you who always predict undefeated seasons and add nothing to any intelligent analysis because you can’ t ever fathom Bills losing a game , yet they have never finished with less than 3 losses in a season,  ,,,how do you explain any losses in your fantasy world?  You are like the typical woke crowd , and have to label something as “ doomerism “ just because it differed from your shallow thinking ; most people get past your level of analytical  thinking by jr high , but you keep hanging on to it cuz that’s the crowd you feel comfortable with , those who mischaracterize anyone who provides critical thinking   Your  little 7 word sentence really adds to furthering anyones understanding of the game situations.  Can’t wait to see you spout more about the intellectual topic of doomerism !  Time always proves how little insight you type have ( hey where are all our Super Bowl titles at ? Omg , I stated an honest fact , so in your little mind  that must mean I hate the team I have followed since ‘63 , and actually went to Superbowls 27 & 28 to be there to see them win, but I am touting doom ? ! ).  Laughable stuff little homer ! 😂🤮☺️

  • Eyeroll 5
  • Disagree 2
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Dislike 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

I’ve given up on nails, and should probably think about getting on a list for a new liver. 

The registry asks if you're a bills fan. 

 

Just check "no" or they automatically disqualify you. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
18 minutes ago, DrPJax said:

Really? And anything to keep being a blind homer ignoring all injuries and no attempt to add any personal insight. . Point out one fact I Misstated!  Now with knox, poyer , edmunds all being out as well , you still think it’s an easy game? Such astute analysis on your part!  Plus I didn’t say we would lose, so your comprehension is still lacking  any credibility. When is it keeping doom going  , saying we would probably win , but not by a 14 point speed that’s being touted.
 

 Go ahead tho and keep proving how people are sheep and blindly lead. It’s guys like you who always predict undefeated seasons and add nothing to any intelligent analysis because you can’ t ever fathom Bills losing a game , yet they have never finished with less than 3 losses in a season,  ,,,how do you explain any losses in your fantasy world?  You are like the typical woke crowd , and have to label something as “ doomerism “ just because it differed from your shallow thinking ; most people get past your level of analytical  thinking by jr high , but you keep hanging on to it cuz that’s the crowd you feel comfortable with , those who mischaracterize anyone who provides critical thinking   Your  little 7 word sentence really adds to furthering anyones understanding of the game situations.  Can’t wait to see you spout more about the intellectual topic of doomerism !  Time always proves how little insight you type have ( hey where are all our Super Bowl titles at ? Omg , I stated an honest fact , so in your little mind  that must mean I hate the team I have followed since ‘63 , and actually went to Superbowls 27 & 28 to be there to see them win, but I am touting doom ? ! ).  Laughable stuff little homer ! 😂🤮☺️

 

take a walk outside....

 

Post is a bit melodramatic 

  • Agree 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, DrPJax said:

Really? And anything to keep being a blind homer ignoring all injuries and no attempt to add any personal insight. . Point out one fact I Misstated!  Now with knox, poyer , edmunds all being out as well , you still think it’s an easy game? Such astute analysis on your part!  Plus I didn’t say we would lose, so your comprehension is still lacking  any credibility. When is it keeping doom going  , saying we would probably win , but not by a 14 point speed that’s being touted.
 

 Go ahead tho and keep proving how people are sheep and blindly lead. It’s guys like you who always predict undefeated seasons and add nothing to any intelligent analysis because you can’ t ever fathom Bills losing a game , yet they have never finished with less than 3 losses in a season,  ,,,how do you explain any losses in your fantasy world?  You are like the typical woke crowd , and have to label something as “ doomerism “ just because it differed from your shallow thinking ; most people get past your level of analytical  thinking by jr high , but you keep hanging on to it cuz that’s the crowd you feel comfortable with , those who mischaracterize anyone who provides critical thinking   Your  little 7 word sentence really adds to furthering anyones understanding of the game situations.  Can’t wait to see you spout more about the intellectual topic of doomerism !  Time always proves how little insight you type have ( hey where are all our Super Bowl titles at ? Omg , I stated an honest fact , so in your little mind  that must mean I hate the team I have followed since ‘63 , and actually went to Superbowls 27 & 28 to be there to see them win, but I am touting doom ? ! ).  Laughable stuff little homer ! 😂🤮☺️

We are three and one with top five defenses and offenses in the league we beat last year Super Bowl champs and the number one seed in the AFC from last year along the way With a mass unit of injuries spacewhy in the world would there be doom right now

Posted
23 minutes ago, DrPJax said:

Really? And anything to keep being a blind homer ignoring all injuries and no attempt to add any personal insight. . Point out one fact I Misstated!  Now with knox, poyer , edmunds all being out as well , you still think it’s an easy game? Such astute analysis on your part!  Plus I didn’t say we would lose, so your comprehension is still lacking  any credibility. When is it keeping doom going  , saying we would probably win , but not by a 14 point speed that’s being touted.
 

 Go ahead tho and keep proving how people are sheep and blindly lead. It’s guys like you who always predict undefeated seasons and add nothing to any intelligent analysis because you can’ t ever fathom Bills losing a game , yet they have never finished with less than 3 losses in a season,  ,,,how do you explain any losses in your fantasy world?  You are like the typical woke crowd , and have to label something as “ doomerism “ just because it differed from your shallow thinking ; most people get past your level of analytical  thinking by jr high , but you keep hanging on to it cuz that’s the crowd you feel comfortable with , those who mischaracterize anyone who provides critical thinking   Your  little 7 word sentence really adds to furthering anyones understanding of the game situations.  Can’t wait to see you spout more about the intellectual topic of doomerism !  Time always proves how little insight you type have ( hey where are all our Super Bowl titles at ? Omg , I stated an honest fact , so in your little mind  that must mean I hate the team I have followed since ‘63 , and actually went to Superbowls 27 & 28 to be there to see them win, but I am touting doom ? ! ).  Laughable stuff little homer ! 😂🤮☺️

Feel better now!

  • Haha (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Stank_Nasty said:

the last list is removing all blitz and stunts. its just rusher vs blocker straight up.

 

Still does not make sense considering Von normally lines up as a wide end and just beats his man inside/outside or straight up bull rush.

 

 

...wait PFF.

 

Ok I get it now :)

 

 

Edited by WideNine
Posted (edited)

I do think the line is too high, especially given the Bills injury report. Hopefully McKenzie clears protocol before the game. Bills always struggle against the Steelers (only beat "Duck" by a TD, despite 4 picks; last year's debacle-- for example).

Edited by par73
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, par73 said:

I do think the line is too high, especially given the Bills injury report. Hopefully McKenzie clears protocol before the game. Bills always struggle against the Steelers (only beat "Duck" by a TD, despite 4 picks; last year's debacle-- for example).

Bills smacked them around pretty good in the Sunday nighter in 2020, though. 

Posted
3 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

I am wondering where this worry is coming from

We have shut down Stafford Lamont and Tua Now we’re worried about a rookie on a losing team?

 

The defense is as healthy as it’s been in weeks because we’re finally getting some interior pass rush back

 

Relax

 

Poyer is out.  

Posted
19 minutes ago, par73 said:

I do think the line is too high, especially given the Bills injury report. Hopefully McKenzie clears protocol before the game. Bills always struggle against the Steelers (only beat "Duck" by a TD, despite 4 picks; last year's debacle-- for example).

Steelers had tj watt for last years debacle…huge difference 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...