Roundybout Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 3 minutes ago, LeviF said: In the functioning moderate liberal world, people like Neely would be dealt with by trained professionals. But leftists got mad at the trained professionals so here we are. Arent leftists the ones pushing for cops to be replace with mental health therapists and such? 1
LeviF Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 Just now, Roundybout said: Arent leftists the ones pushing for cops to be replace with mental health therapists and such? Mental health therapists don’t intervene in this kind of situation *in a mental hospital.* What makes you think they’ll intervene on the street or in a subway? 2
Roundybout Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 19 minutes ago, LeviF said: Mental health therapists don’t intervene in this kind of situation *in a mental hospital.* What makes you think they’ll intervene on the street or in a subway? Why wouldn’t they intervene in a hospital where they have full jurisdiction to do so? I bet if you paid them to have jurisdiction on the streets and ensured they had some kind of backup, it would work. 1 1
LeviF Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Why wouldn’t they intervene in a hospital where they have full jurisdiction to do so? I bet if you paid them to have jurisdiction on the streets and ensured they had some kind of backup, it would work. They have “Dr. Strong” take care of it for them during a crisis. Note that by “intervene” I mean physically insert themselves into the crisis situation rather than extricate themselves. Edit to add: and even if your scenario were both effective and possible (it isn’t) then the same problem exists: response time. The average subway patron is not required to be an orderly in the open air asylum leftists (defund and defang police) and neocons (close the dedicated mental health facilities) have worked hand in hand to create. Edited May 5, 2023 by LeviF 3
Roundybout Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 11 hours ago, LeviF said: They have “Dr. Strong” take care of it for them during a crisis. Note that by “intervene” I mean physically insert themselves into the crisis situation rather than extricate themselves. Edit to add: and even if your scenario were both effective and possible (it isn’t) then the same problem exists: response time. The average subway patron is not required to be an orderly in the open air asylum leftists (defund and defang police) and neocons (close the dedicated mental health facilities) have worked hand in hand to create. Well in my scenario, people with mental issues are removed to care before they get on the subway like this. Like, weeks before. The only policy of Eric Adams' that I agree with is the mandatory removal of mentally ill people to treatment centers. You cannot have disgusting methheads harassing people walking by. This of course does not mean you can choke them to death. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Well in my scenario, people with mental issues are removed to care before they get on the subway like this. Like, weeks before. The only policy of Eric Adams' that I agree with is the mandatory removal of mentally ill people to treatment centers. You cannot have disgusting methheads harassing people walking by. This of course does not mean you can choke them to death. So you can't and don't support civilians, but you support the state "removed to care" of people. LMAO
LeviF Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Roundybout said: Well in my scenario, people with mental issues are removed to care before they get on the subway like this. Like, weeks before. The only policy of Eric Adams' that I agree with is the mandatory removal of mentally ill people to treatment centers. You cannot have disgusting methheads harassing people walking by. This of course does not mean you can choke them to death. Yeah, if I had my druthers, the guy would have been in an asylum long ago if the chatter about his mental health is true. But this is another consequence of the ethos of "care" and "harm reduction" that we seem to have fallen into regarding addicts and the insane. There are absolutely times where you may, under the letter of the law, kill someone, sometimes intentionally! What we do know about Neely is that he was often a threat to people on the train. I'm not sure if this was the case this time, but this case certainly has a higher likelihood of "defense of others" than do other homicide investigations. Now generally I think that the residents of New York City are getting what's coming to them when they have their lives threatened by insane vagrants on public transportation. It's all part of that vibrant city life they've been asking for. The law doesn't quite feel the same way. 3
Roundybout Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 47 minutes ago, Chris farley said: So you can't and don't support civilians, but you support the state "removed to care" of people. LMAO You got "I don't support civilians" from "I don't think you should murder people?" Strange. 1
Tommy Callahan Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 26 minutes ago, Roundybout said: You got "I don't support civilians" from "I don't think you should murder people?" Strange. its OK, next week you will be parroting talking points about some cops use of force on someone, vs a social worker or some BS. This week you are for having the police just mass round up crazy, homeless.
aristocrat Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 Why aren’t the headlines…former child kidnapper killed in subway? Weird 1 1
Roundybout Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 5 hours ago, Chris farley said: its OK, next week you will be parroting talking points about some cops use of force on someone, vs a social worker or some BS. This week you are for having the police just mass round up crazy, homeless. I am for strategies that give aid and assistance to people who do not have the agency to make decisions for themselves, yes. and also strategies where Mr. Vigilante doesn’t strangle people to death because he felt “uncomfortable.” 2 hours ago, B-Man said: Sickening. Seethe and cope, rightoids 1
LeviF Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 The evidence that the left has already manufactured the "future" conservatives constantly warn about is abundant in this very thread. Neely is a saint, a martyr, just like George Floyd. No matter your status, if you step in to stop him from pushing a woman onto the subway tracks or beating the hell out of an elderly woman you are committing the mortal sin of not permitting black crime, which is the legal and moral equivalent of Lynching™️. 2
aristocrat Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 8 hours ago, Roundybout said: Well in my scenario, people with mental issues are removed to care before they get on the subway like this. Like, weeks before. The only policy of Eric Adams' that I agree with is the mandatory removal of mentally ill people to treatment centers. You cannot have disgusting methheads harassing people walking by. This of course does not mean you can choke them to death. you support anti lgbt people? I sure don’t that’s for sure. 1 1
LeviF Posted May 5, 2023 Posted May 5, 2023 54 minutes ago, aristocrat said: you support anti lgbt people? I sure don’t that’s for sure. Hating gays is only a crime if you’re White or Asian. Blacks, who nearly all by themselves got prop 8 passed in California, are unassailable in the leftist religion. Is it hypocrisy? No, because blacks are free from original sin (racism) and thus incapable of committing wrongthink. 4
Recommended Posts