Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, didn’t the Bills lose to the Chiefs on some fluke BS too? 
 

Up 2 scores under 2 mins to go, complete fluke.  They SHOULD have simply fallen down and won the game.. sounds similar to what the Bills SHOULD have done too.

You mean in a really close game between two really good teams? That's your comparison?

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

 

I think the Browns could go 2-6 in their next 8.

Falcons, Chargers, Pats, Ravens, Bengals, Dolphins, Bills and Bucs.

 

I think you should be prepared to be really wrong.

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Dislike 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, didn’t the Bills lose to the Chiefs on some fluke BS too? 
 

Up 2 scores under 2 mins to go, complete fluke.  They SHOULD have simply fallen down and won the game.. sounds similar to what the Bills SHOULD have done too.

Jets != Chiefs...

 

When you find yourself in a hole.. stop digging..

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, BillsFan4 said:

It’s only 1080p.

 

Fox sports used to do the Thursday night 4k broadcasts last year but now that Amazon took over its 1080p. But at least we get HDR.


I understood what you were saying. 
 

The difference between 2k and 4k is most noticeable when they have to zoom in on a replay or the like. Standard viewing is marginal. 

Fox put a different lens on their 4k cameras to trick viewers that the resolution was somehow different or better. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, DCofNC said:

Yeah, didn’t the Bills lose to the Chiefs on some fluke BS too? 
 

Up 2 scores under 2 mins to go, complete fluke.  They SHOULD have simply fallen down and won the game.. sounds similar to what the Bills SHOULD have done too.

 

This is not a good comparison at all.  The Jets are a bottom feeder team led by Joe Flacco who I think was 1-11 in his last 12 starts.  The Chiefs are Super Bowl contenders every year since Mahomes has been the QB.

  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

You mean in a really close game between two really good teams? That's your comparison?

Complete fluke situations.. tell me any time you would say, “kicking the ball off with 13 seconds, the opponent needs a TD to go ahead” you think there’s a chance.  No different than “ up 13, kicking off with 1:55 to go” you think there’s a chance.  
 

stupid ***** happens. 
 

Brissett isn’t great, but their run game is and their D is under achieving thus far, this is a better version of last year’s Patriots.  They will be in the playoffs.

  • Vomit 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

This is NOT the steel curtain.

Swiss 🧀  curtain. I understand Watt is out, but there needs to be more depth or talent. The whole defense can't be built upon one dude.

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, DCofNC said:

Complete fluke situations.. tell me any time you would say, “kicking the ball off with 13 seconds, the opponent needs a TD to go ahead” you think there’s a chance.  No different than “ up 13, kicking off with 1:55 to go” you think there’s a chance.  
 

stupid ***** happens. 
 

Brissett isn’t great, but their run game is and their D is under achieving thus far, this is a better version of last year’s Patriots.  They will be in the playoffs.

Well they were actually down 3 and just needed a FG so only needed to get in FG range. It was a ***** up to be sure. But a good team doesn't let the Jets do that to them.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...