Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

NOBODY EXPECTS THE JAN. 6 INQUISITION: 

 

Jonathan Turley: Why does a congressional committee care what Ginni Thomas “believes”?

 

Select committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) left the voluntary interview with the Committee to report, according to Politico, “she still believes false claims that the 2020 election was stolen from former President Donald Trump.”

 

Ok, so what? Millions of people hold the same view. They have a right to hold that view. There was never any evidence that Thomas participated in any violence and had simply encouraged White House and other officials to challenge the election.

 

Remember: Democrats are allowed to claim elections are tainted, and Democrats are allowed to engage in political violence. Republicans are not allowed to even think about such things without having the weight of the politico/media establishment come down on them.

 

 

 

Plus: “None of the media even raised the question of whether such interviews could be viewed as harassment or pressure on a member of the Supreme Court.” It is, and it’s intended to be.

 

https://hotair.com/headlines/2022/09/30/why-does-a-congressional-committee-care-what-ginni-thomas-believes-n500003

 

 

 

Posted

Because they're desperately flailing, hoping to tie it to Clarence Thomas and get him removed.  Nothing more, nothing less.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

 

 

Who denies election results?

Jewish World Review, by Victor Davis Hanson

 

A Democratic myth has arisen that former President Donald Trump's denial of the accuracy of the 2020 vote was "unprecedented." Unfortunately, the history of U.S. elections is often a story of both legitimate and illegitimate election denialism. The 1800, 1824, 1876, and 1960 elections were all understandably questioned. In some of these cases, a partisan House of Representatives decided the winner. Presidential candidate Al Gore in 2000 did not accept the popular vote results in Florida. He spent five weeks futilely contesting the state's tally — until recounts and the Supreme Court certified it.

 

https://jewishworldreview.com/1022/hanson102022.php3

 

.

Posted
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Presidential candidate Al Gore in 2000 did not accept the popular vote results in Florida. He spent five weeks futilely contesting the state's tally — until recounts and the Supreme Court certified it.

If only Trump had done the same when the courts (including the Supreme Court) shot down each and every one of his arguments. 
Victor Davis Hanson used to be a respected professor of ancient history and a thoughtful conservative critic. He is now nothing more than a hack, saying there is absolutely no meaningful distinction between challenging the counting of votes in the courts and then conceding when they decide against you vs summoning an angry mob to try to stop a ministerial process from being completed AFTER your court challenges have failed. 

×
×
  • Create New...