\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted May 14, 2005 Share Posted May 14, 2005 http://www.freep.com/news/mich/naughty12e_20050512.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazyDingo Posted May 15, 2005 Share Posted May 15, 2005 the appeals court said any "incidental restriction" on the First Amendment is "no greater than is essential to the furtherance of the governmental interest in promoting public morality by prohibiting public nudity. When the Taliban was interested in promoting public morality, everyone bitched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcjeff215 Posted May 15, 2005 Share Posted May 15, 2005 the appeals court said any "incidental restriction" on the First Amendment is "no greater than is essential to the furtherance of the governmental interest in promoting public morality by prohibiting public nudity. When the Taliban was interested in promoting public morality, everyone bitched. 336700[/snapback] Don't worry, the U.S. will step in and save us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts