\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted May 14, 2005 Posted May 14, 2005 http://www.freep.com/news/mich/naughty12e_20050512.htm
crazyDingo Posted May 15, 2005 Posted May 15, 2005 the appeals court said any "incidental restriction" on the First Amendment is "no greater than is essential to the furtherance of the governmental interest in promoting public morality by prohibiting public nudity. When the Taliban was interested in promoting public morality, everyone bitched.
mcjeff215 Posted May 15, 2005 Posted May 15, 2005 the appeals court said any "incidental restriction" on the First Amendment is "no greater than is essential to the furtherance of the governmental interest in promoting public morality by prohibiting public nudity. When the Taliban was interested in promoting public morality, everyone bitched. 336700[/snapback] Don't worry, the U.S. will step in and save us!
Recommended Posts