PFT: Can the Bills thrive under the weight of high expectations?

[Sestak4ever]

I think Josh, and the team in general, learned last year that you can never take your foot off the gas pedal (as happened last season in the Jaguars game). Proper preparation and coaching will make sure they play each game one game at a time. It goes without saying that the cumulative season will be a measure of that success. I am an eternal optomist when it comes to the Bills, but if we stay healthy I could see them setting records offensively. Go Bills!!

[BarleyNY]

Honestly, this isn’t a worry of mine. The meat grinder that is the AFC right now is. 

[hondo in seattle]

Listening to player interviews, I think they're handing the expectations well: focus on the grind, one game at a time, etc.

 

I worry more about other things: our cornerback situation while Tre is out, the development of Boogie and Groot, the depth on our offensive line, will even the starting OL be good enough?  

 

The Lombardi isn't being handed to us.  I expect challenges we'll need to meet.  

[SlimShady'sSpaceForce]

Can they?  
frankly I was shocked 😳 reading this > 

https://www.nfl.com/news/super-bowl-lvii-predictions-bills-vs-buccaneers-in-arizona

 

 

Super Bowl LVII predictions: Bills and Buccaneers to face off for the Lombardi Trophy in Arizona?

12 experts 

 

12 Bills victories.  
 

 

[ToGoGo]

My biggest concern is the media. As teams reach this type of level of attention, the attention-seekers and power-hungry come out of the woodwork. 

 

That's when you get Jay Skurskis trying to get the front office fired even after they did the right thing. Now imagine ESPN and SI carrying that torch over some soundbite a random player or coach said. 

 

Allen is sort of a household name right now, but once he reaches Mahomes/Manning/Brady levels of fame, he enters into weirdo world. TMZ everywhere, celebrities hanging around, off the field distractions to the max. When Nike starts paying you as much as the Bills do, strange conflicts of interest start to appear. 

[Fleezoid]

5 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

All I know is that at this time 6 days from now, this board will either be in "17-0 we going all the way" mode or "9-8 we suck arse” mode. There is no middle ground. 

 

 

For me, 6 days from now I'll be saying 17-0 or 16-1. Then, 11 days after that I'll be saying 17-0 or 15-2. 6 days after that I'll be saying 17-0 or 16-1 or 15-2, or ...... Well, you get the point

[Warcodered]

6 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

The AFC currently has 13 legitimate contenders — maybe 14 if the Jaguars turn things around suddenly under the guidance of Super Bowl-winning coach Doug Pederson.

I'm sorry what, did they really try and just slide in maybe the Jaguars will be Super Bowl Contenders like that was something sane people would think?

Edited September 3, 2022 by Warcodered

[muppy]

5 hours ago, YoloinOhio said:

All I know is that at this time 6 days from now, this board will either be in "17-0 we going all the way" mode or "9-8 we suck arse” mode. There is no middle ground. 

 

except in mupville hermano....steady as she goes...........tck!~!~

 

m

 

 

[Don Otreply]

In a word, Yes! 
 

Go Bills!!!

[Sierra Foothills]

6 hours ago, LeGOATski said:

 

The Patriots, Dolphins, and Browns cannot make the Super Bowl. Mike Florio is kidding himself with that.

 

Maybe but Florio also makes the point that if you disagree, consider last year's Cincinnati Bengals. The Bengals were 4-11-1 in 2020. They were in the Super Bowl the next year.

 

5 hours ago, Coach Tuesday said:

I actually think the real pressure will come NEXT season if the Bills don’t make it to the SB this year and fans start to realize the true lost opportunity of “13 seconds” - hopefully we never get there.

 

Rightly or wrongly, 13 seconds will become a part of a narrative... either that it was the continuation of a pattern of deep playoff failure or that it was a turning point, a necessary setback which the team turned into a springboard for Super Bowl appearances. That narrative pivots on this season.

 

5 hours ago, Einstein said:

This part:

 

As he enters his sixth season as head coach of the team, McDermott has to be feeling that pressure. He has to be wondering whether someone higher in the organization than him will wonder whether McDermott has taken the franchise as far as he can, if the can’t take them to the Super Bowl this year.

 

I agree with the first sentence but disagree with the second one.

 

The 13 seconds debacle is definitely on the shoulders of McDermott (and to a LESSER degree, Frazier and Farwell).

 

However McDermott is very safe IMO. I don't see the Pegulas ditching a coach who has brought the team so much success. It would take a few more flameouts for him to be on the hot seat IMO.

 

 

[Don Otreply]

2 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

So you want everyone to be like Sal? Just parrot whatever McBeane says as right and support the team while shouting down fans? 

Yes, yes I do! 😂

[ColoradoBills]

Sure, the Bills have expectations.  I do think last regular season was a lesson for them not taking each game as serious as they

should have.

 

This year it's this.

Win the Division with as many wins as possible.  They all mean something when it comes to home field throughout the playoffs.

The whole team knows this.  It's up to McDermott, Josh and Von to keep them focused.

 

2 home wins and you're in.

 

Then its winner takes all.

 

They got a good shot, but it's still a long tough journey.

 

 

[Scott7975]

This team is certainly talented enough to win a superbowl.  I think they were last year as well.  A lot has to go right to do that.  A lot of teams are also talented enough to win a superbowl.

[The Wiz]

23 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

Maybe but Florio also makes the point that if you disagree, consider last year's Cincinnati Bengals. The Bengals were 4-11-1 in 2020. They were in the Super Bowl the next year.

 

 

Rightly or wrongly, 13 seconds will become a part of a narrative... either that it was the continuation of a pattern of deep playoff failure or that it was a turning point, a necessary setback which the team turned into a springboard for Super Bowl appearances. That narrative pivots on this season.

 

 

I agree with the first sentence but disagree with the second one.

 

The 13 seconds debacle is definitely on the shoulders of McDermott (and to a LESSER degree, Frazier and Farwell).

 

However McDermott is very safe IMO. I don't see the Pegulas ditching a coach who has brought the team so much success. It would take a few more flameouts for him to be on the hot seat IMO.

 

 

I see "13 seconds" as a compounding failure. 

 

1. Farewell/Bass didn't get the memo to keep it in play (no time off the clock)

 

2. McD calls timeout for no apparent reason after defense is set up. 

 

3. Frazier runs same defensive play and they already know what it is to give them a free play. 

 

Take away one of these things and they probably come out with a win. 

 

For all 3 of them to happen in succession was just an overall failure by coaching.  (and luck for KC).

[JakeFrommStateFarm]

10 minutes ago, Scott7975 said:

This team is certainly talented enough to win a superbowl.  I think they were last year as well.  A lot has to go right to do that.  A lot of teams are also talented enough to win a superbowl.

Talent is not enough.

 

You have to have luck as well.

 

Get lucky with low number of injuries or if a key guy gets injured, his backup steps in and doesn't miss a beat.

 

And coaches that know how to manage and call a game. All that has to come together 

[Sierra Foothills]

42 minutes ago, The Wiz said:

I see "13 seconds" as a compounding failure. 

 

1. Farewell/Bass didn't get the memo to keep it in play (no time off the clock)

 

2. McD calls timeout for no apparent reason after defense is set up. 

 

3. Frazier runs same defensive play and they already know what it is to give them a free play. 

 

Take away one of these things and they probably come out with a win. 

 

For all 3 of them to happen in succession was just an overall failure by coaching.  (and luck for KC).

 

And that's why I said it was on McDermott and to a lesser degree Frazier and Farwell because the Head Coach has to bear ultimate responsibility and oversight as to the important details at crucial times.

 

McDermott either involved himself incorrectly or insufficiently. He should/could have involved himself in a way that at least one of the above mistakes didn't happen.

 

I'm a big McDermott fan but the fact that all of them happened is on him IMO.

 

 

[Scott7975]

59 minutes ago, JakeFrommStateFarm said:

Talent is not enough.

 

You have to have luck as well.

 

Get lucky with low number of injuries or if a key guy gets injured, his backup steps in and doesn't miss a beat.

 

And coaches that know how to manage and call a game. All that has to come together 

Yeah thats why I also said "alot has to go right."  I kind of lumped luck, decision making, etc into that.

[LeGOATski]

2 hours ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

Maybe but Florio also makes the point that if you disagree, consider last year's Cincinnati Bengals. The Bengals were 4-11-1 in 2020. They were in the Super Bowl the next year.

 

I viewed the Bengals much differently. They had built a talented roster throughout and had a bonafide franchise QB that everyone could see was the real deal, taken 1st overall the previous year. They were on the up-and-up, whereas the Pats, Dolphins, Browns are stagnant or just bad. They have huge question marks at QB and culture/chemistry issues.

 

Picking the Bengals to make a SB run last year would've been a significant dark horse candidate, but it wouldn't have been outrageous to mention them in an article such as this, considering the talent. IMO, the Pats, Phins, and Browns are not the same type of candidates with that kind of potential.

[Sierra Foothills]

1 minute ago, LeGOATski said:

I viewed the Bengals much differently. They had built a talented roster throughout and had a bonafide franchise QB that everyone could see was the real deal, taken 1st overall the previous year. They were on the up-and-up, whereas the Pats, Dolphins, Browns are stagnant or just bad. They have huge question marks at QB and culture/chemistry issues.

 

Picking the Bengals to make a SB run last year would've been a significant dark horse candidate, but it wouldn't have been outrageous to mention them in an article such as this, considering the talent. IMO, the Pats, Phins, and Browns are not the same type of candidates with that kind of potential.

 

I agree with you about the Pats and the Browns (though the Browns are talented except at QB).

 

I could actually see a scenario where Miami has a very good season.

[LeGOATski]

12 minutes ago, Sierra Foothills said:

 

I agree with you about the Pats and the Browns (though the Browns are talented except at QB).

 

I could actually see a scenario where Miami has a very good season.

They can't make a run until they get a different QB