SectionC3 Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 And, maybe, some time in the can. I'd love to hear the explanation for this one, MAGA. It's before 9a eastern, so you have plenty of time today to think of a nice hoax or some creative fake news to try to explain this away. Enjoy! https://apnews.com/article/mar-a-lago-government-and-politics-1fef158c3a66bfc0ba6224570753ba47 2
Beach Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 12 minutes ago, 716er said: i like that you actually posted a picture
716er Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 1 minute ago, Beach said: i like that you actually posted a picture Yes, you are very simple.
Beach Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 Just now, 716er said: Yes, you are very simple. i compliment you and in return you insult me?
716er Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 Just now, Beach said: i compliment you and in return you insult me? If that’s in insult you must have been pissing your pants at the insurrection rally. 1 1
TSOL Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 The DOJ suspects you have a point with this thread, but no evidence can be found because Trump moved your point offshore right before you made it, although he will possibly be subpoenaed once they uncover the super secret hidden boxes.
snafu Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 Actually, what is the purpose of that photo? Trump had the documents all strewn around on the floor? 1
dpberr Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 Can presidents declassify matters directly? Yes, because it is ultimately their constitutional authority. Facts don't need to matter to the FBI or media, but when Trump skates for the 100th time, facts will be why he does. 1 1 1
B-Man Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 A thread with a false title is worth little...........but it does expose the OP As reported, the DOJ dropped a filing on Tuesday evening in an attempt to deny the appointment of a special master regarding the documents seized during the now infamous Trump raid. In that filing was a photograph that set leftwing hearts a flutter, purporting to show “top secret” documents scattered on the floor of a Mar-a-Lago storage room. In reality, the documents were found in boxes per the DOJ’s own documentation. The DOJ knew what it was doing putting that photo out, though. They wanted to gin up more “the walls are closing in” outrage from the left, and sure enough, they got it. Social media was swamped with hysterical declarations that charges were incoming. That picture was “criminal evidence,” they screeched while racking up the likes and shares along the way. But while The New York Times broke the story (because it’s a DOJ pipeline for leaks), apparently many didn’t bother to read the details. There’s a rather inconvenient line not being talked about. "Time in the can" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . what a buffoon Section 8 is. https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/08/31/report-on-possible-trump-charges-leaves-the-resistance-reeling-n620617
Tiberius Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 1 hour ago, snafu said: Actually, what is the purpose of that photo? Trump had the documents all strewn around on the floor? Top secret documents that are in no way secure. Putin loves that!
Irv Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 7 hours ago, SectionC3 said: And, maybe, some time in the can. I'd love to hear the explanation for this one, MAGA. It's before 9a eastern, so you have plenty of time today to think of a nice hoax or some creative fake news to try to explain this away. Enjoy! https://apnews.com/article/mar-a-lago-government-and-politics-1fef158c3a66bfc0ba6224570753ba47 AP news. "All Phony". What a mess.
nedboy7 Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 1 hour ago, dpberr said: Can presidents declassify matters directly? Yes, because it is ultimately their constitutional authority. Facts don't need to matter to the FBI or media, but when Trump skates for the 100th time, facts will be why he does. But since the FBI searched former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate for documents —some classified—that were allegedly held illegally, Trump’s allies have added a new comic-book twist to this theory. They’re arguing that a president can declassify a document just by thinking about it. In this telling, any documents Trump brought home had been declassified just because he took them—and were therefore already in the public domain. Indeed, the wish-based method of declassification is wishful thinking. New York Times reporter Charlie Savage’s tour of the topic quotes one expert as calling it a “logical mess” to ask whether a president can declassify information without telling anyone. Classification affects how the government handles documents. Unless agencies know a document’s classification, they can’t change how they handle it. Other versions of the argument are not necessarily better. In one telling, during his presidency Trump issued a “standing order” that any document brought from the Oval Office to the White House residence was immediately deemed declassified. But Trump’s former national security adviser John Bolton called this “a complete fiction.” And again, how would agencies be notified? 1
Nineforty Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 56 minutes ago, B-Man said: A thread with a false title is worth little...........but it does expose the OP As reported, the DOJ dropped a filing on Tuesday evening in an attempt to deny the appointment of a special master regarding the documents seized during the now infamous Trump raid. In that filing was a photograph that set leftwing hearts a flutter, purporting to show “top secret” documents scattered on the floor of a Mar-a-Lago storage room. In reality, the documents were found in boxes per the DOJ’s own documentation. The DOJ knew what it was doing putting that photo out, though. They wanted to gin up more “the walls are closing in” outrage from the left, and sure enough, they got it. Social media was swamped with hysterical declarations that charges were incoming. That picture was “criminal evidence,” they screeched while racking up the likes and shares along the way. But while The New York Times broke the story (because it’s a DOJ pipeline for leaks), apparently many didn’t bother to read the details. There’s a rather inconvenient line not being talked about. "Time in the can" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . what a buffoon Section 8 is. https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/08/31/report-on-possible-trump-charges-leaves-the-resistance-reeling-n620617 you are a ***** idiot. it's called an inventory that the FBI agents are required to record. and yes, the DOJ did include it in a COURT filing, to show what the traitor sat on, after lying and saying he gave it all back. and why were they allowed to show this photo to the public? Because of Trump's own bull#### filing. He has himself to blame for the evidence now being in the public sphere.
Chef Jim Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 Quick question. What do you all think are the chances that a high percentage of former Presidents have walked away with copies of classified documents? Personally I think it’s likely pretty high. 🤷🏻♂️ 1
Nineforty Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said: Quick question. What do you all think are the chances that a high percentage of former Presidents have walked away with copies of classified documents? Personally I think it’s likely pretty high. 🤷🏻♂️ gtfoh. go home. Edited August 31, 2022 by Nineforty 1
SectionC3 Posted August 31, 2022 Author Posted August 31, 2022 2 hours ago, snafu said: Actually, what is the purpose of that photo? Trump had the documents all strewn around on the floor? Point made. 15 minutes ago, Nineforty said: I disagree with this only to the extent that if plea negotiations involved prison, then I’d consider trying to string it out as long as possible given the age and poor health of this client on the theory that he might die before trial. Otherwise, yes, in a situation where we aren’t dealing with a corpulent, elderly, exercise-averse, serial consumer of Big Macs, anyone with even part of a brain would be angling for a plea.
Chef Jim Posted August 31, 2022 Posted August 31, 2022 16 minutes ago, Nineforty said: gtfoh. go home. Good answer. 🙄 So you disagree. That’s fine. But I think you’re pretty naive to think Trump is the first and only one to have done so.
Recommended Posts