HappyDays Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 Just now, Bills2022 said: There is not a DA alive who will pass on charging someone in a high profile case. They make careers out of this type of case. It is wrong, but that is how DA offices work. It has been months since he supposedly admitted to having sex with her and the DA has not brought those charges against him.
Sammy Watkins' Rib Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, Daniel from az said: I keep things simple...let the process play out Things will play out. Question is, is that with or without Ariza on the team? We will have an answer pretty soon. If he is still on the team come Monday I don't see them releasing him before the season. 1
Ralonzo Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 1 minute ago, Motorin' said: You seem to have heard what you wanted to hear. No, what I wanted to hear was about position battles and depth charts. I certainly did not hear any of that.
The Wiz Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Daniel from az said: I keep things simple...let the process play out Why are you so simple minded? You need to blow this out of proportion from every angle you can think of because you don't have any real facts. 😝 Edited August 26, 2022 by The Wiz 1 1
Motorin' Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 Just now, Ralonzo said: No, what I wanted to hear was about position battles and depth charts. I certainly did not hear any of that. You wanted them to ignore the accusations. Got it.
1ManRaid Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 32 minutes ago, Bills2022 said: The Pegulas have a daughter on the professional women's tennis tour. And a couple other daughters. Terry Pegula is not going to allow this guy to remain on the team. Pretty confident Pegula would get rid of him based on the statutory rape claim alone. The guy admitted to having sex with her. He can't survive that even if it was consensual. I am not sure how the guy gets around the 17yr old girl issue even if everything else is false. I'm pretty sure the notion of her actually telling people she was a college student/legal age might have something to do with defending a stat rape charge. This part isn't a he said/she said case that needs a long investigation, he already admitted to having sex with her. The fact that he wasn't charged with stat rape long ago is likely proof that there's something there with the claims she was lying about making it known she was underage. 1
B-Man Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 Again...there's two different things at work here. The criminal investigation, going back to October, which the Bills seem to have investigated. And the civil suit, which this @$$h@l& ambulance-chasing lawyer seems to have blindsided everyone with, including the Bills. Not doing due diligence on a civil suit filed yesterday by a sh*tbag attorney trying his case on Twitter isn't even an excusable lapse, since it's not a lapse at all. And there's rightly a dearth of information released concerning the criminal investigation. 4 1
Ralonzo Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 Just now, Motorin' said: You wanted them to ignore the accusations. Got it. Tell ya what, I’ll watch the Bills, you go watch court tv, and we can give each other updates later. 2
haroldwaide Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 With him not playing tonight, the Bills have a few more days to investigate all options before final cuts are made. My guess is not disclosing these potential charges to the Bills before the draft will be his ultimate undoing and he will be cut. The Bills just need more time first, despite what their statement said.
UKBillFan Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 I wonder what the alleged victim's attorney fascination with Araiza is? There are two others who have been named in the gang rape, who I think have had civil charges brought against them too but not a sound. I can think of three possibilities: 1) The attorney is playing off Araiza being a rising 'star' in the NFL for attention 2) He thinks that the DA may not press criminal charges against Araiza, so wants to court public opinion for the civil case, whereas it's looking more likely that the other two will be charged 3) He dislikes Araiza's attorney and that is driving him as much as the case is. The other two defendants have different attorney's Perhaps it's a bit of all three. 3 1
Bills2022 Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 1 minute ago, HappyDays said: It has been months since he supposedly admitted to having sex with her and the DA has not brought those charges against him. DA's always sit on these cases until they are told to bring them. My guess is right after Labor Day. Election season.
BillsShredder83 Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 1 hour ago, Billsflyer12 said: If you don’t know the difference between being fired and lynching then I have little hope for you. Maybe you don't know the definition of lynching, hint, has nothing to do with a tree
UKBillFan Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Again...there's two different things at work here. The criminal investigation, going back to October, which the Bills seem to have investigated. And the civil suit, which this @$$h@l& ambulance-chasing lawyer seems to have blindsided everyone with, including the Bills. Not doing due diligence on a civil suit filed yesterday by a sh*tbag attorney trying his case on Twitter isn't even an excusable lapse, since it's not a lapse at all. And there's rightly a dearth of information released concerning the criminal investigation. If the Bills' front office serioulsy thought there was no risk of a civil case being brought then they need their collective heads testing. 4
YoloinOhio Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 Just now, UKBillFan said: If the Bills' front office serioulsy thought there was no risk of a civil case being brought then they need their collective heads testing. Huh? They were told on 7/30 that a civil case was pending
Motorin' Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Ralonzo said: Tell ya what, I’ll watch the Bills, you go watch court tv, and we can give each other updates later. Says the guy posting in the Matt Araiza rape allegation thread. Please do spare us your horrid takes. Edited August 26, 2022 by Motorin'
BillsShredder83 Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 1 hour ago, Shake_My_Head said: That headline seems designed to generate clicks and cast aspersions on the Bills. Why would they ever talk to the plaintiff's lawyer? Talk to law enforcement, talk to private investigators. Just like in the McCoy case that's been cited a few times in this thread... Wawrow for ya, I'm shocked 🙄 1
Beck Water Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 7 minutes ago, Bills2022 said: There is not a DA alive who will pass on charging someone in a high profile case. They make careers out of this type of case. It is wrong, but that is how DA offices work. Well..... the DA did "pass" on charging Shady McCoy in the Philly nightclub case. That woulda been pretty high profile. Not saying you're wrong, but I do think other factors play into it, such as whether they'll be successful. From what I understand DA's thrive on high conviction rates, too. 1
Yobogoya! Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, UKBillFan said: If the Bills' front office serioulsy thought there was no risk of a civil case being brought then they need their collective heads testing. plaintiffs attorney has apparently been hounding them so pretty sure that’s not the case. 1
UKBillFan Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said: Huh? They were told on 7/30 that a civil case was pending I read the OP as saying there was no lapse of judgement from the Bills as the civil case blindsided them. I disagree, partly for the reason you say. Edited August 26, 2022 by UKBillFan
Bills2022 Posted August 26, 2022 Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said: I'm pretty sure the notion of her actually telling people she was a college student/legal age might have something to do with defending a stat rape charge. This part isn't a he said/she said case that needs a long investigation, he already admitted to having sex with her. The fact that he wasn't charged with stat rape long ago is likely proof that there's something there with the claims she was lying about making it known she was underage. He is going to get charged. My guess is all this national attention is being coordinated with some ambitious DA and somebody running for office. This case will be brought right in middle of election season. He likely has a great defense but he is going to get charged. Edited August 26, 2022 by Bills2022 1
Recommended Posts