Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, gobills404 said:

Coming from the guy that thinks it’s professional to interact with pornstars online while representing yourself and your work. Your credibility is long gone my guy.

Why is it unprofessional to interact with porn stars online?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

I can't get over how many people are trying to pull the "cut him, he's just a punter, who cares" card.  As I've said before, I don't care if he's an All Pro QB, "just a punter", the waterboy, or a bum in the street, your station or fame shouldn't dictate what rights you have.  Way to reinforce the idea that only the rich and famous are worthy of respect, dignity, and fundamental rights.

  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Mango said:


Somebody posted an article in the thread. The US is notorious for under investigating rapes. There’s an estimated 200,000 unprocessed rape kits. 

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2019/07/nationwide-epidemic-of-untested-rape-kits-atlantic-daily/594046/

College gang rapes get priority

potential high profile case gets priority

The police had in by the start of November 10 months ago.

 

blame them then for the delay.

 

Posted

Here's a thought, to avoid the NFLPA problem, just wait until Tennessee cuts Kern and sign him. Then you can just give a good BS answer to keep the NFLPA off our back too.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

That's what he allegedly told her - is that normally what you'd say to an almost certainly unrecognizable phone number and you were aware you did something to the girl

Do we know for a fact it was him who replied?

 

if he knew this girl and knew this number he coukd have said I’m not answering this. But one of his buddy did the talking.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Aussie Joe said:


They cut him …but he still traveled to the game with the team

 

Right

 

Maybe he just appreciates first rate tail gate?  🤷‍♂️

 

He knows we will come thru! 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, djp14150 said:

Do we know for a fact it was him who replied?

 

if he knew this girl and knew this number he coukd have said I’m not answering this. But one of his buddy did the talking.

 

 

We know absolutely nothing really

 

So just cut him 

  • Dislike 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

 

 

Maybe....hear me out.....maybe this all escalated because he is now in the NFL.......maybe just maybe.....there are a lot more horror stories attached to prospects we'll never know about.  

 

Just a hunch on that tho obviously I believe they're all saints.  

 

 

Im 50/50. Something tells me that the civil suit got timed not long after he signed his contract, won the starting job, and about to play his first NFL game. So maybe being in the nfl did escalate it. The other part of me tells me the civil suit got triggered because the criminal case seems to have stalled. 

 

Either way, I would imagine there would be enough evidence to make an educated determination.  The crime she describes is very violent and she went to the police the next day. I would imagine there is physical evidence she was assaulted and probably a good chance of pictures were taken at the party that can prove them being there, possibly together. 

 

I think his lawyer and her lawyer are both spouting nonsense. I would want to see what the actual evidence is, because I think both lawyers are putting too much spin on what they are saying publicly

Posted

Keeping Araiza off the field tonight is the best decision for everybody involved. We have two weeks before we need him to take snaps. That should give the situation enough time to develop and the Bills to respond properly to the numerous question marks.

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted

Pregame Field update, I'm on the field in Carolina and Tyler Bass just stood at the 20 yardline and booted it to the opposite 10...😝   FG and Punt god Bass ladies and gents.

  • Haha (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, BillsNutHawaii said:

Lets examine this, (With my response in parentheses after each of your statements):

 

- "It’s pretty easy to tell all the individuals who have their own skeletons in their closets coming out to defend this piece of trash."  (It's pretty easy to tell who the individuals are who do not value:  due process, the laws passed by our representatives, or the US Constitution in general).

 

- "Why DEFEND Araiza at all?"  (There's no defense of the individual in question, there is a defense of due process.)

 

- "To silence any other women who have the courage to come forward?"  (No one rationale wants to silence anyone else.  I would question why anyone would only want the accusers voice to be heard, and who would try to silence the defendant, that failed logic is what needs to be questioned.  Additionally, why is your question only focusing on supposedly silencing women?  Seems there is a failure to acknowledge and understand that men are also viscously assaulted.) 

 

- "You don’t know anything except charges have been levied."  ( I / we all know as much about the charges as you do, assuming you were not directly involved here.)

 

- "What grounds do you have to defend such abhorrent accusations?"  (As previously covered, the grounds to defend the accusations are based on defending due process at large, and not just an individual.  Additionally, with the same vigor to determine if the accusations are true, the justice system also needs to take equal effort to determine if the accusations are false.)   

 

- "Every stupid emoji, every baseless defense on indefensible actions speaks volumes to your own personal character, and which virtues you hold true, if any."  (I agree, including yours.) 

 

- "If any of you taking the stance of blindly defending this dbag just because he he’s got a Buffalo on his helmet, as your wives what they think, or daughters, or mothers."  (I do think of my wife, daughter and mother.  But it would be false logic to believe abuse is limited to females. We also need to think of the husbands, sons and fathers.)

 

If my logic or conclusions are flawed, flame away, I'm here to learn; I'm interested in the truth.  On the other hand, I'm not too interested in biased viewpoints and I'm skeptical of those who try to suppress the viewpoints of others, (Via supposed shaming, etc).  In the apparent absence of continued / imminent danger to the accuser (She's getting the therapy and support she needs / deserves - the defendant is no where near her), let the punter have his job till due process dictates otherwise.

1-Due process fails sexual assault victims on a regular basis, hence why so many are found not guilty in criminal court but then liable in a civil suit.

 

2- clearly you’re not staying as up to date on the details as you should be, ie pictures of the victim that have been released… 

 

3- once again, see one, most rapists never serve a day in prison for their crime.

 

4- so which virtue do I hold true? Defending those who are almost always skewered as having “ulterior motives”, when that’s almost always not the case?  I.e. Ben & Kobe off the top of my head. Any time a high profile case hits the wires, everybody starts screaming “cash grab”, people drag the victims through the mud only to find out these individuals settled out of court. As if this mentality in public has no effect on other women coming forward. Oh and why do I focus on women, bc 9/10 rape victims are women… is that good enough for you? The victims skew super heavily to the female population. 1/3 women is victim of some form of sexual assault in their lives, that number is just unacceptable and attitudes like yours do nothing to help drive that number the opposite direction.

 

5- once again, rape victims are women an overwhelming majority of the time. These are hard facts.  Sick of hearing let the courts sort it out. So what happens if there is no criminal conviction but he’s found liable in a civil suit, as so often is the case with these matters, or he settles out of court?  Then we just look the other way.  I myself don’t want the Mike Vick, Adrian Peterson, Tyreek Hills of the world on my team, why would I want this piece of garbage representing Buffalo in any way shape or form?

 

6- The NFL is a privilege, not a right. Araiza knowingly withheld this information from the Bills in the pre draft process. That alone is grounds to cut him, as this is the last thing a team with it’s eye on the Super Bowl needs less than two weeks fro, the start of the regular season.

 

I’m just applying what I know combined with statistics.

 

He admitted he had sex with a minor, at a party with alcohol

He contacted her to tell her she should get tested for STDs

Her idiot lawyer released pictures showing her bruising/physical trauma

He withheld this information in the pre draft process

Only 2-10%, with the number being believed to be around 6-8% of accusations are false.

That means over 90% of rape accusations are in fact true.

Given the information we do know, combined with the numbers supporting accusers, and him withholding information, I don’t get how he deserves to keep his roster spot.

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, HappyDays said:

Keeping Araiza off the field tonight is the best decision for everybody involved. We have two weeks before we need him to take snaps. That should give the situation enough time to develop and the Bills to respond properly to the numerous question marks.

Yep.  This seems reasonable to me.  Not fair to put the kid out there under a spotlight if he's innocent, and not fair to the fanbase to put him out there if the Bills know more than they've let on.

  • Agree 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...