Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, ddaryl said:

Thats not what happen. Araiza's Parents contacted his lawyer lawyer asked them what they arelooking for $$$$ wise, the victims lawyer just wouldn't accept it.

 

No. Read the whole text thread HER lawyer posted. It clearly shows that the plaintiff was seeking a settlement and Araiza's lawyer said they would never settle. The plaintiffs lawyer then threatened that Araiza will regret that "they will do what they always do and litigate it civilly then". At some point the defendent's lawyer said "Araiza's parents asked me to ask you about a number" which the defendent's lawyer THEN ignored.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, SCBills said:


And here we have the laziest take of the day. 

I’m not the guy who was talking about Dicaprio movies to support that what the puntophile did was ok, but go off buddy. Or that he’s part of the team so we have to support him. 

Edited by MWK
  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, ddaryl said:

 

 

Thats not what happen. Araiza's Parents contacted his lawyer and asked them what they are looking for $$$$ wise, the victims lawyer just wouldn't accept it.  
 

https://twitter.com/dangilleon/status/1562969378412322822/photo/1

 

 

This lawyer putting this into the national spotlight via twitter is not helping. Scummy behavior that denotes him as the "ambulance-chaser" level of lawyer. Not that it changes the merits of the case, just that the optics are horrible.

  • Agree 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Bob in STL said:

I know what Because McDermott just said - he was a good teammate.  That is why they cut him, to provide him more time to find another job.  

 

I said he was a below average punter.  

 

 

They also said Ford was one of their best olinemen this year and we all know that isn't true or we wouldn't of traded him. We have this thing about keeping our best talent.

 

Everything Beane and McDermott say about a player is 100% the truth take it to the bank. 

 

But this is besides the point. I said he stunk and needed to be replaced as he was easily replaceable by someone as talented or better. So I'm happy he is gone regardless of the Araiza issue now.

 

And you said  he was a good team mate? Who cares? That is not a good reason to keep him. 

 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Dislike 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:

This is the quiet part I don't think @gene1973 or some of the other supporters don't want to say out loud. Amazing we took 130 pages to get to the part where we finally got a contingent of folks to conclude that  ***** minors is ok.

Well, a 21 year old having sex with a 17 year old is okay, at least to me.  I strongly support "Romeo & Juliet" provisions specifically because of stuff like this.

 

To clarify, I am 50.  If I hit on a 17 year old, I am a creep and the DA should throw the book at me.  Likewise, a 21 year old hitting on a 14 year old is creepy.  Throw the book at that guy, absolutely.

 

But 17 and 21 are approximately the same age.  There's always going to be some gray area here, but this is fine IMO.

  • Agree 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, Rico said:

Without going thru this monster thread..

I find it very hard to believe that Kim Pegula would stand for any of this if there was anything concrete to it. I don't know her status right now, none of my business, but I think at the very least her family knows where she stands & would agree with her take. So I will support the Bills 100% on this, and I will support the Punt God as long as he is a Bill. :thumbsup:

 

Not sure her health allows her to be directly involved these days.  I had similar thoughts.

Posted
1 minute ago, BUFFALOBART said:

In Ca., it doesn't matter. A Minor, cannot consent to sex, in any capacity. Even if the girl lied, it's still a Felony. I'm just the messenger, and that is how it is.

 

Its not though. Again this has been rehashed and rehashed. It is a wobbler law in CA.

Posted
1 minute ago, MWK said:

I’m not the guy who was talking about Dicaprio movies to support that what the puntophile did was ok, but go off buddy


Followed up with the laziest strawman of the day. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, blitzboy54 said:


the police report said she said she was in high school, he then gave her a drink and took her out back. 

 

What part of this is sitting well with you?

 

And there's also reports saying she was telling people she was in college, not high school.  

Posted
7 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

Of course you are…

 

Of course you aren't.  But no matter.

 

6 minutes ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:

If she lied about being in college that could be different, if she said she was in high school I don't think it's that simple. 

 

There is no way she went to a college party and said she was in high school.

 

6 minutes ago, Mango said:

FTFY. 

 

I stand by what I said originally.

  • Agree 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

 

I'm sure the Q-contingent from PPP who regularly accuse people of being pedos and groomers with no real evidence will be all over this against Araiza.

 

Is there pizza involved? 😏 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, MiltonWaddams said:

This lawyer putting this into the national spotlight via twitter is not helping. Scummy behavior that denotes him as the "ambulance-chaser" level of lawyer. Not that it changes the merits of the case, just that the optics are horrible.

 

The lawyer putting this in the national spotlight is the only way this got traction in almost a year of no movement and roadblocks by the police and university.


You dont like it, take it up with the school and police.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, SCBills said:


And here we have the laziest take of the day. 

Completely different situations. Most on here are saying let the situation play out. If he’s done what he’s accused of then he’s gone.
Mina Kimes already blasting Bills investigation. If that’s deserved we will all agree. Bills are certainly acting like they are all in supporting him. So I think a bit of patience is required. Bills have demonstrated an organization that has its act together. Time will tell. If they are on the wrong side of this it will hurt the franchise in a very big way. A great deal at steak and the Bills ownership/leadership know this. 

  • Agree 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, BUFFALOBART said:

In Ca., it doesn't matter. A Minor, cannot consent to sex, in any capacity. Even if the girl lied, it's still a Felony. I'm just the messenger, and that is how it is. The Cops MIGHT think, that they have a sketchy witness, but now we are dealing in 'what if's'.

 

This is wrong.  There is a provision for mistaken age.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Agree 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, 1ManRaid said:

 

And there's also reports saying she was telling people she was in college, not high school.  

Dude, why the ***** are people making excuses for some nobody pos… fan base is extremely disappointing. Anybody wants to defend ***** like this doesn’t have a woman in there life they give any ***** about.

  • Eyeroll 5
Posted
39 minutes ago, Rc2catch said:

But the information about the tapes is just her recollection of what was said?? I asked last night cause I was confused by it I thought snippets were leaked out. If the tape is so cut and dry you’d think the criminal charges would of been filed a long time ago. 

 

  And any DNA results from the rape kit.  I'd expect they did blood analysis as well to detect any rape drug that may have been in her system.  I don't know the length if time traces of various drugs can be found but of course the lab techs that do these know the variables. All that info is what the DA will decide whether or not charges can be made.  No evidence would mean no charges should be made  if there is sufficient evidence then the matter should go to trial in a court of law and let the evidence sway the jury to a correct just verdict whichever way the evidence points.  And I truly hope for whomever the innocent party is that the verdict is the correct one even if none but the people involved themselves know what actually took place.  

 

  I'd have assumed a rape kit and the evidence it produces would be sufficiently evaluated by now to know whether a crime may have occurred as alleged.  We need to hear something from the SDPD as to the status of the investigation and any conclusions they have made if any.   I don't believe the Bills would have drafted Araiza if they knew he was accused of rape.  Its not like he such an essential talent that they risk the negative PR.  Really don't want this mess distracting the team but I also want the right people punished in this matter  if it's the players if they did rape the girl.  Or those trying to extort money from Araiza based on his notoriety and thinking it be easy pickings.

 

 

Posted

After all of this slander on something with 0 concrete evidence available to the public yet, 

 

I will 100% be buying his jersey and supporting him as a Bill as strongly as I can IF he’s proven innocent 

  • Agree 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, QLBillsFan said:

Completely different situations. Most on here are saying let the situation play out. If he’s done what he’s accused of then he’s gone.
Mina Kimes already blasting Bills investigation. If that’s deserved we will all agree. Bills are certainly acting like they are all in supporting him. So I think a bit of patience is required. Bills have demonstrated an organization that has its act together. Time will tell. If they are on the wrong side of this it will hurt the franchise in a very big way. A great deal at steak and the Bills ownership/leadership know this. 

Where? Dry aged, prime, ribeye?  What are we talking here?

Just now, Dr.Mantis_Toboggan said:

Dude, why the ***** are people making excuses for some nobody pos… fan base is extremely disappointing. Anybody wants to defend ***** like this doesn’t have a woman in there life they give any ***** about.

Outrage is not a virtue.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...