Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Kmart128 said:

I dont think so for 3 reasons.

 

1. This has been investigated for a year and no criminal charges have been handed out yet.

2. Araizas Lawyer is denying that he was even in the Bedroom

3. Sounds like Bills looked into the situation  previously 

It's possible the Bills thought it could be settled behind closed doors like whatever that thing with Von Miller was a couple months ago. Obviously ***** has blown up now.

Posted
4 minutes ago, ndirish1978 said:

 

Haack signed with the Colts yesterday


Id be much more furious with the PR team said “thoroughly loved investigated matter”, because that means at MINIMUM the Bills know he had sex with an underage girl 

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, DRsGhost said:

 

C'mon man, what's this other side of the story nonsense?  Where's your pitchfork?

I have to get on record now so everyone knows that I'M a good person.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted
57 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

Do not rush to judgement.

The Bills are already saying they knew about it soooo

57 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

Do not rush to judgement.

The Bills are already saying they knew about it soooo

57 minutes ago, D. L. Hot-Flamethrower said:

Do not rush to judgement.

The Bills are already saying they knew about it soooo

Posted
2 minutes ago, Process said:

For those saying the Bills must have known.....zero chance. They aren't risking the culture they've spent years building for a freaking punter.

Or cutting the current punter with knowledge of this incident. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Beast said:

 

I just read the article. She did file a pllice report before this.

 

I can tell you this, with the alleged audio call (recorded) to Araiza, and his remarks from that call, this does not look good at all. Mark my word, the boy is going to get arrested.

 

He is at the very least going to be had for a statutory rape charge and maybe a lot worse.

 

Let me start off by saying that if the allegations are true, he deserves to be buried under the prison.

 

But the phone call that "does not look good" for him?  Hypothetically if he was innocent, and she's suddenly asking weirdly pointed questions about their encounter over the phone when you know an investigation had already been opened, I don't blame even an innocent man to be having massive alarms screaming "SHUT YOUR MOUTH SAY NOTHING FUTHER TO HER" in his head.  Innocent or not, YOU DO NOT TALK TO POLICE, and it's not unreasonable to assume she was being directed by police on that call.  Police/investigators are very good at getting even innocent people they have their sights on to say things that could be twisted and construed into being evidence against them.  Talking to police, even if you are 100% innocent, can LITERALLY do nothing to help you.

 

As for statutory rape in California, their laws are kind of insane.  I don't have much to say about this case in that regard because she has to prove she was telling the truth in that he knew she was under 18, but their law is ridiculous.  You and your girlfriend could both be 17 in California, with your gf being exactly 1 day younger than you.  Every day you have sex and it's apparently perfectly fine.  That is, until your 18th birthday, AND ONLY ON THAT SPECIFIC DAY, it is suddenly illegal to have sex with her.  Then the next day she also turns 18, and all is good again.  The "Romeo and Juliet exception" would reduce your punishment, but there would still be a charge.

  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, Process said:

For those saying the Bills must have known.....zero chance. They aren't risking the culture they've spent years building for a freaking punter.

No. The investigation was kept quiet. No one knew or else this would’ve been a huge story. There was a tweet at Matt a month ago but it never made it to Buffalo media for whatever reason. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, quinnearlysghost88 said:

The Bills are already saying they knew about it soooo

The Bills are already saying they knew about it soooo

The Bills are already saying they knew about it soooo

Where?

  • Eyeroll 1
Posted
Just now, appoo said:


Id be much more furious with the PR team said “thoroughly loved investigated matter”, because that means at MINIMUM the Bills know he had sex with an underage girl 

Well Araiza's lawyer is denying it...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Process said:

For those saying the Bills must have known.....zero chance. They aren't risking the culture they've spent years building for a freaking punter.


It’s  also inexcusable that they didn’t know. They need to answer some serious questions regarding this. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Kmart128 said:

I dont think so for 3 reasons.

 

1. This has been investigated for a year and no criminal charges have been handed out yet.

2. Araizas Lawyer is denying that he was even in the Bedroom

3. Sounds like Bills looked into the situation  previously 

 

1. True, but still sets up a potential lengthy suspension...for a rookie punter.

2. Irrelevant

3. Best point

 

4. Hopefully Bills won't give in to any sort of public/ESPN pressure to cut him prematurely. They should stand by their assessment of the situation - the fact it goes public changes nothing factually - and let the process play out.

Edited by Airseven
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, appoo said:

 
You realize he admitted to statutory rape right?

 

https://www.cwsdefense.com/blog/2020/june/exceptions-to-californias-statutory-rape-laws/#:~:text=In California%2C it is illegal,informed consent to sexual activities.

 

Matt was 22 when this incident happened. At BEST - a drunk girl started talking to him, and he didn’t bother to get her age, and decided the best course of action was to have sex with her, and that drink girl was 17. Someone who was over 20% younger than him - senior in college. 
 

He shouldn’t be on this team

 

#hedidthemath 

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Beck Water said:

 

Edit:

 

I opened my yap too soon.

 

Apparently, in California, the age of consent is actually 18

https://www.newmanallen.com/blog/2021/august/what-is-the-age-of-consent-in-california-/

 

And there is no "Romeo and Juliet" exemption

 

So in Cali, apparently if two high school students under 18 have sex after the prom, that's rape?

 

No, one of the actors has to be 18.

Edited by Beast
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...