Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

And they would B more if they voted for the Don in 2024. 

 

Maybe, but not because of things that really mattered, like his policies.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Maybe, but not because of things that really mattered, like his policies.

Maybe, maybe not.  Depends what he does (or doesn’t do) when he’s there.  

Posted
10 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said:

Me too! What the heck, why not? 

All that campaign money too!!!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Burisma?

The pay is exceptional, the time commitment and knowledge base minimal.  
 

This is why you are El Docturo, and I a humble purveyor of trinkets, Belgian chocolate and nylons for the fairer sex. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

If her goal is to win the White House, yeah she seems like a longshot. To say the least.

 

If her goal is to kneecap Trump and Trump's candidates... She's only got to poll between 3-5% to start flipping red states purple and purple states blue. 

 

Everyone thought Ralph Nader was a joke, until he took 3% of the vote from Al Gore in Florida.  And I don't think President Gore would have filled his Cabinet with "Project for the New American Century" brainiacs and Neocon imperialists, but that's just a What If. 

 

We live in a country where every electoral strategy is based on winning 51-49.  That gives here the chance to wield all sorts of influence.  But just the chance. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Coffeesforclosers said:

If her goal is to win the White House, yeah she seems like a longshot. To say the least.

 

If her goal is to kneecap Trump and Trump's candidates... She's only got to poll between 3-5% to start flipping red states purple and purple states blue. 

 

Everyone thought Ralph Nader was a joke, until he took 3% of the vote from Al Gore in Florida.  And I don't think President Gore would have filled his Cabinet with "Project for the New American Century" brainiacs and Neocon imperialists, but that's just a What If. 

 

We live in a country where every electoral strategy is based on winning 51-49.  That gives here the chance to wield all sorts of influence.  But just the chance. 

The electoral strategy is to convince a sh-t ton of people that the other guy is Rasputin coming to eat their children. One could argue it all started with Gore and his Supreme Court Hail Mary,  and got ratcheted up from there.   

It’s working, and will be the standard until it stops working.  Who’d a ever thunk the Dems would convince their minions to saddle up and ride with a Cheney.   

 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

The electoral strategy is to convince a sh-t ton of people that the other guy is Rasputin coming to eat their children. One could argue it all started with Gore and his Supreme Court Hail Mary,  and got ratcheted up from there.   

It’s working, and will be the standard until it stops working.  Who’d a ever thunk the Dems would convince their minions to saddle up and ride with a Cheney.   

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Coffeesforclosers said:

If her goal is to win the White House, yeah she seems like a longshot. To say the least.

 

If her goal is to kneecap Trump and Trump's candidates... She's only got to poll between 3-5% to start flipping red states purple and purple states blue. 

 

Everyone thought Ralph Nader was a joke, until he took 3% of the vote from Al Gore in Florida.  And I don't think President Gore would have filled his Cabinet with "Project for the New American Century" brainiacs and Neocon imperialists, but that's just a What If. 

 

We live in a country where every electoral strategy is based on winning 51-49.  That gives here the chance to wield all sorts of influence.  But just the chance. 

She can't be dumb enough to think she can win.  Its gotta be handicapping the orangutan.  Unless, and I'm gonna put on a tin foil hat here, she's aware of some bad forthcoming scandal or has more details on those pending.  

Posted

Cheney.  What a loser. I can’t stop laughing at her stupid look on her face.  She should run as VP with Demented Biden.  Hilarious.  What a mess.  

Posted
10 hours ago, Tiberius said:

The Trumpers cheering the defeat of a person that stands up for the rule of law. 

 

Because she stands up for the rule of law. 

 

 

She’s a military industrial complex neo con…and she would love nothing more than to walk in the war criminal footsteps of her father…👍

  • Shocked 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

She’s a military industrial complex neo con…and she would love nothing more than to walk in the war criminal footsteps of her father…👍

All of which was no problem until she stood up for rule of law, then the Party was against her 

Posted
3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

LIZ CHENEY’S NET WORTH BALLOONED AS MUCH AS 600 PERCENT DURING HER TIME IN OFFICE. From $7m to $44m.

 

Of course, this is hardly confined to Cheney, but given the bipartisan nature of these suspicious wealth increases, you’d think the media would be more on top of it.

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/08/11/records-liz-cheneys-net-worth-ballooned-much-600-percent-during-her-time-office/

 

 


And let’s be honest, Breitbart wouldn’t be calling it out if she hadn’t opted to make this latest career decision to co-direct the summer blockbuster expose…  

2 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

She’s a military industrial complex neo con…and she would love nothing more than to walk in the war criminal footsteps of her father…👍


You’re trying to explain chess to a sub par checker player ja. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Tiberius said:

The Trumpers cheering the defeat of a person that stands up for the rule of law. 

 

Because she stands up for the rule of law. 

 

 

How was the rule of law applied during the January 6th hearings? Please enlighten us. No cross examinations, no witnesses from the “defendant”. This would quantify as a kangaroo court. Again, wrong as usual. 

×
×
  • Create New...