Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

Not if he's touching the ball 400 times a year. 


that's not the Bills M.O. with JA as QB... So no worries there. The Ball will be well distibuted. To many weapons on O.

Posted
1 hour ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

I'd trade Moss for a 4th if any team is desperate for an RB

Desperate and RB do not belong in any sentence in today's NFL.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Moss is a good pass blocker, I do think his power/toughness is overrated. He just doesn't excite me.  I guess he was decent as a receiving back.  Hopefully he proves me wrong when given the chance

Singletary was good down the stretch last year he was playing like a top 10 back for half a dozen games. 

 

Agree on Moss. he's a slow average dime a dozen back.

 

Singletary is okay, like his elusiveness, wish he had more speed/acceleration to his game.

 

Good runs turn into great runs with speed.

 

I'm hoping Cook takes the starting job over.

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

I'm interested to see what the Bills envision Cook as. 

 

They've tried to cheaply address a pass-catching running back with veterans - TJ Yeldon, Matt Breida, signing JD McKissic. 

 

But there is no evidence that pass-catching RB's are a big part of the Bills offense. And why would I want that? Josh Allen dumping down more? 

 

I don't want the 2019 Carolina Panthers, where Christian McCaffery was their offense. Catching 116 passes, running the ball 287 times. It's the Saints dilemma now with Alvin Kamara dominating touches. It's 2007-2008 Buffalo Bills pop-gun football. 

 

The Bills got better immediately last year when they benched Moss, and picked the correct RB (Singletary) and fed him the ball when the chose to run. 

Under Daboll, I think Dorsey is tweaking the offense so that we could see more two TE sets and running backs will get more passes seen their way too. Just a feeling, I could be completely wrong. 

Posted

To me the only thing that matters is that we do not continue to do this committee stuff.

 

We were at our best when Singletary took the lions share of the snaps.

 

Learn from the mistakes of last year. We were switching guys in and out way too often and the run game looked terrible.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Ramza86 said:

To me the only thing that matters is that we do not continue to do this committee stuff.

 

We were at our best when Singletary took the lions share of the snaps.

 

Learn from the mistakes of last year. We were switching guys in and out way too often and the run game looked terrible.

 

A lot of RBs need enough runs to get in the groove.

I do think Moss makes the team again, but he will be RB3.  With Gilliam and Jones dressing every week and if history is any indication,

Moss will not be dressing for a lot of games.

I have no idea what if any his role will be next season.

Posted
2 hours ago, T master said:

He's allowed 2 per year 1 in the preseason & 1 in the real season .

 

I think i would rather have Blackshear over Moss since seeing what he did in that last game . If he has another game like that i would really rather him than Moss !! 

 

6 carries for 11 yards?  He seems to be more of a cook type than power back like Moss.  He'll make the PS as well.   

 

Can he block?  

 

2 hours ago, Warriorspikes51 said:

Moss is a good pass blocker, I do think his power/toughness is overrated. He just doesn't excite me.  I guess he was decent as a receiving back.  Hopefully he proves me wrong when given the chance

Singletary was good down the stretch last year he was playing like a top 10 back for half a dozen games. 

 

 

Moss doesn't seem to use his power for extra yards - its just... punishment.  He runs right at you with the ball secure against his chest. He can block, and he sort of seems to enjoy inflicting punishment.

 

Singletary got a bunch of TDs and a single 100 yard game.  He also fumbles considerably more than Moss.  

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

Under Daboll, I think Dorsey is tweaking the offense so that we could see more two TE sets and running backs will get more passes seen their way too. Just a feeling, I could be completely wrong. 

Seems like they gave up the 2 TE set pretty quick when Howard showed he isn't ever getting back to his normal self... but I don't know maybe it's already in and practiced. I just haven't heard much of anything about them running 2 TE sets since week 1 of TC.

 

Does anyone know if they did it in the Red vs Blue practice game?

Edited by TBBills
Posted
14 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

6 carries for 11 yards?  He seems to be more of a cook type than power back like Moss.  He'll make the PS as well.   

 

Can he block?  

 

Well to be fair he was rushing behind a pretty bad OL.

He showed what he could do in the passing game with 4 receptions and 60 yards.

Taking 2 KRs and 1 PR (16 years) wasn't bad either.

I want to see more.  He is no doubt PS bound but may have a chance to make the main roster next year.

Posted
3 hours ago, The Jokeman said:

Under Daboll, I think Dorsey is tweaking the offense so that we could see more two TE sets and running backs will get more passes seen their way too. Just a feeling, I could be completely wrong. 


People say that, but we need two legit TE’s to do that. 

We have one. 
 

Howard is probably fine as a TE2 as depth, but I’m not seeing him convincing anyone - yet - that we need to be forcing 12 personnel just because Dorsey did it 100 years ago at the U. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, SCBills said:


People say that, but we need two legit TE’s to do that. 

We have one. 
 

Howard is probably fine as a TE2 as depth, but I’m not seeing him convincing anyone - yet - that we need to be forcing 12 personnel just because Dorsey did it 100 years ago at the U. 

 

All true.  One thing I haven't heard anything about is how is Howard doing in blocking.  Something I will keep an eye on tomorrow.

If he is used in that role, he won't run out a pass pattern at the snap.  He will stay in and block and then leak out sometimes for a catch.

I can live with that this year as long as he is blocking well and Knox keeps his current role.

 

The negative of all this is if Knox is out for any length of time Howard will not be effective in Dawson's role.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Ramza86 said:

To me the only thing that matters is that we do not continue to do this committee stuff.

 

We were at our best when Singletary took the lions share of the snaps.

 

Learn from the mistakes of last year. We were switching guys in and out way too often and the run game looked terrible.

 

Causation does not mean Correlation.  I feel as though the offensive line is at the crux of a lot of the run game issues.  

 

We started the year with 

Dawkins (missed camp with bad covid)

Feliciano (lost weight, but somehow looked more out of shape than ever before)

Morse 

Ford (don't need to get into it)

Williams 

 

Williams is too slow to get outside on outside zone rushes to the right, and too sloppy to prevent backside backers from cleaning up the play.  Brown was put in because they felt like he could open up the running game. 

 

Williams shifted to RG because Ford is bad.  Brown missed some time at T so they shifted Boettger in at Guard.  Ford shuffled back in when Feliciano got hurt (that lovely Jax game).  There was some covid related shifting for another week, and then Boettger was injured and they inserted Bates.  Feliciano returned from IR and didn't have a spot as bates had out performed him, and Williams is a much better pass blocker.

 

That's a lot of shuffling.  You also have to look at how many snaps Ford and Feliciano got - for how insanely inept both played.

 

With Boettger on the PUP to start the year, the starting 5 is pretty set.  Quessenberry and Doyle appear to be the next men up after that, but Boettger returning rounds out the depth a lot better.  Hopefully the Saffold/Kromer additions, healthy dawkins, and healthy Brown will make this unit improved.

1 hour ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

Well to be fair he was rushing behind a pretty bad OL.

He showed what he could do in the passing game with 4 receptions and 60 yards.

Taking 2 KRs and 1 PR (16 years) wasn't bad either.

I want to see more.  He is no doubt PS bound but may have a chance to make the main roster next year.

 

The only issue i see is that is pretty similar to Cooks skillset.  Moss brings a different skillset as a plus blocker, wrecking ball style runner, with good ball security.  

 

Cook is the shifty pass catcher type who will likely grow into other roles over the course of the year.  Singletary is a pretty well rounded back, lacks some top end speed but hes quicker and tougher than any combine would say.  Taiwan jones is the special teams guy who can play in a pinch.  

 

I don't think Moss would be active every week unless there are injuries, but on certain weeks i would think it'd make sense to carry him.  

Edited by Bleeding Bills Blue
Posted
4 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

The only issue i see is that is pretty similar to Cooks skillset.  Moss brings a different skillset as a plus blocker, wrecking ball style runner, with good ball security.

 

True but I see no problem if it works out that way.  Moss is on the team this year and maybe next.

Cook is hopefully taking over Singletary's role next season so having Cook, Moss and Blackshear would not be a problem with me.

Posted
10 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

True but I see no problem if it works out that way.  Moss is on the team this year and maybe next.

Cook is hopefully taking over Singletary's role next season so having Cook, Moss and Blackshear would not be a problem with me.

 

Its a tough market for running backs out there, DS will probably make less than he thinks.  

 

Barkley

Hunt

Jacobs

Montgomery

Sanders

Williams

Harris

Pollard

Plus the draft. Plus a bunch of guys i didn't list.  

 

This past year 4 guys got more than 5M AAV - Patterson, Edmonds, Fournette, Penny.  6 players got more than 1 year - Fournette, Edmonds, Patterson, Mckissic, Bolden, Ogunbowale.  

 

Obviously dependent on Cook's development and skills, but if you could bring DS back for something like 4-6M then I don't think it'd be bad.  Still keeps the total RB cap number in the middle of the pack, keeps continuity and draft picks.  Obviously depends how he performs this year too (do we want him back?)

Posted
14 minutes ago, Bleeding Bills Blue said:

 

Its a tough market for running backs out there, DS will probably make less than he thinks.  

 

Barkley

Hunt

Jacobs

Montgomery

Sanders

Williams

Harris

Pollard

Plus the draft. Plus a bunch of guys i didn't list.  

 

This past year 4 guys got more than 5M AAV - Patterson, Edmonds, Fournette, Penny.  6 players got more than 1 year - Fournette, Edmonds, Patterson, Mckissic, Bolden, Ogunbowale.  

 

Obviously dependent on Cook's development and skills, but if you could bring DS back for something like 4-6M then I don't think it'd be bad.  Still keeps the total RB cap number in the middle of the pack, keeps continuity and draft picks.  Obviously depends how he performs this year too (do we want him back?)

 

All true.  What seems a little weird about the typical "above average" RB is they move on from the team they had a lot of success with to

another team and generally their play goes down.   Often times they get cut and don't make the big money due at the end of their 2nd contract.

Then they are out there signing with a third team often for way less.

 

I get the elite guys going for the huge paydays, but I often wonder if the better than average guys would do better in the long run (money/performance wise)

just staying with their drafted teams for longer periods of time.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
8 hours ago, ColoradoBills said:

 

All true.  What seems a little weird about the typical "above average" RB is they move on from the team they had a lot of success with to

another team and generally their play goes down.   Often times they get cut and don't make the big money due at the end of their 2nd contract.

Then they are out there signing with a third team often for way less.

 

I get the elite guys going for the huge paydays, but I often wonder if the better than average guys would do better in the long run (money/performance wise)

just staying with their drafted teams for longer periods of time.

 

 

 

If only the entire system wasn't stacked against this kind of thinking...

 

Then again, it's nearly impossible to argue against players absolutely maximizing their money as soon as possible, without exception. In such a dangerous, short-lived career, especially for RBs who are devalued and prone to even shorter careers, it's just smart to get the most lucrative possible 2nd NFL contract. 

  • Agree 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...