Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 29, 2022 Posted October 29, 2022 https://thehill.com/homenews/house/405877-maxine-waters-i-threaten-trump-supporters-all-the-time “Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up,” Waters told a crowd in California over the weekend. “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd, and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” This is different. Obviously. 1 hour ago, BillStime said: 100% pro terror 100% pro-terror. But this is different. Obviously. idiot 1
BillStime Posted October 29, 2022 Posted October 29, 2022 Celebrating violence - on brand for the cult
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 29, 2022 Posted October 29, 2022 (edited) Celebrating violence. On brand for the party of peace, love and science. idiots/freaks Edited October 29, 2022 by JDHillFan Spelling 1
Tiberius Posted October 30, 2022 Posted October 30, 2022 17 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Celebrating violence. On brand for the party of peace, love and science. idiots/freaks Randy Paul lost a fist fight, got beat up mano-on-mano, no one attacked him with a weapon. It was a gardening dispute, not political violence
Biden is Mentally Fit Posted October 30, 2022 Posted October 30, 2022 27 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Randy Paul lost a fist fight, got beat up mano-on-mano, no one attacked him with a weapon. It was a gardening dispute, not political violence You are excusing violence against someone you disagree with. Very Putin-y. You should move to Russia. 1
Doc Posted October 30, 2022 Posted October 30, 2022 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Randy Paul lost a fist fight, got beat up mano-on-mano, no one attacked him with a weapon. It was a gardening dispute, not political violence "Attempted assassination of Nan." LOL! Nan would had the good sense to stay in the bathroom...
Tiberius Posted October 30, 2022 Posted October 30, 2022 4 minutes ago, Doc said: "Attempted assassination of Nan." LOL! Nan would had the good sense to stay in the bathroom... Fake news, right? And you complain about being called a Cult
Doc Posted October 31, 2022 Posted October 31, 2022 9 hours ago, Tiberius said: Fake news, right? And you complain about being called a Cult First of all, if Nan had been home, she'd have had security and this never would have happened. But don't let that spoil the narrative. Not that they shouldn't have 24/7 security for him with all the money they have and the target he is. But I don't believe for one second that DePape was calling for Nan based merely on what Paul Pelosi claimed and will need actual proof. As for the bathroom thing, that's what POLITICO reported. If Paul came out of it, he's an idiot.
SectionC3 Posted November 1, 2022 Author Posted November 1, 2022 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: yes they are Yup. Not one word about what could be an attempt to assassinate the Speaker of the House. On 10/30/2022 at 10:40 PM, Doc said: First of all, if Nan had been home, she'd have had security and this never would have happened. But don't let that spoil the narrative. Not that they shouldn't have 24/7 security for him with all the money they have and the target he is. But I don't believe for one second that DePape was calling for Nan based merely on what Paul Pelosi claimed and will need actual proof. As for the bathroom thing, that's what POLITICO reported. If Paul came out of it, he's an idiot. Victim blaming. And Paul Pelosi’s statement constitutes “actual proof.” It’s up to the fact finder whether to believe it. 1
Doc Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 6 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Yup. Not one word about what could be an attempt to assassinate the Speaker of the House. Victim blaming. And Paul Pelosi’s statement constitutes “actual proof.” It’s up to the fact finder whether to believe it. Funny, you libs had no problem blaming people who didn't get the Wuhan vaccine if they got sick or died. So that dog don't hunt no mo. And it's not proof, actual or otherwise. It's a statement.
SectionC3 Posted November 1, 2022 Author Posted November 1, 2022 24 minutes ago, Doc said: Funny, you libs had no problem blaming people who didn't get the Wuhan vaccine if they got sick or died. So that dog don't hunt no mo. And it's not proof, actual or otherwise. It's a statement. Hoax. They had a choice whether to get the vaccine. Give me liberty or death, they said. Some got liberty, others got death. That was their choice. Paul Pelosi didn’t have a choice when a criminal burglarized his home and hit him with a hammer. 1
Doc Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 (edited) 27 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. They had a choice whether to get the vaccine. Give me liberty or death, they said. Some got liberty, others got death. That was their choice. Paul Pelosi didn’t have a choice when a criminal burglarized his home and hit him with a hammer. He had the choice to do the smart thing and lock himself in his bathroom. He chose poorly. Same exact thing. Edited November 1, 2022 by Doc
Wacka Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 38 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. They had a choice whether to get the vaccine. Give me liberty or death, they said. Some got liberty, others got death. That was their choice. Paul Pelosi didn’t have a choice when a criminal burglarized his home and hit him with a hammer. He had choice to pull out a gun and blow the gut away. 1
SectionC3 Posted November 1, 2022 Author Posted November 1, 2022 59 minutes ago, Wacka said: He had choice to pull out a gun and blow the gut away. Ridiculous. But let’s play a stupid game. Say Paul had a gun and wants to use it, but gets the shakes and misses, and then the assailant puts the hammer through Paul’s skull and kills him. At that point, is it Paul’s fault for being a lousy shot? Just now, SectionC3 said: Ridiculous. But let’s play a stupid game. Say Paul had a gun and wants to use it, but gets the shakes and misses, and then the assailant puts the hammer through Paul’s skull and kills him. At that point, is it Paul’s fault for being a lousy shot? Or, what is the assailant was shot, but the bullet stopped by a vest? It’s then Paul’s fault for not having a high caliber rifle?
Commsvet11 Posted November 1, 2022 Posted November 1, 2022 2 hours ago, SectionC3 said: Ridiculous. But let’s play a stupid game. Say Paul had a gun and wants to use it, but gets the shakes and misses, and then the assailant puts the hammer through Paul’s skull and kills him. At that point, is it Paul’s fault for being a lousy shot? Or, what is the assailant was shot, but the bullet stopped by a vest? It’s then Paul’s fault for not having a high caliber rifle? 1.) Do you actually think someone with a vest is going to continue on after getting shot? Do you know what happens when you get shot with a bullet proof vest? 2.) Shotgun, wide spread, you ain’t missing anything close range with that.
Recommended Posts