Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, BillStime said:

👆🤡
 

The cult is getting testy 

 

image.thumb.jpeg.39dbb07dda00f90450cf6398662c6a00.jpeg

Just wait until they see the pics released this morning.  It’s gonna get even better! 

Posted
41 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

Lots of hoax here.  Biden didn't raid anyone's home.  The FBI, which operates without White House input, executed a search warrant at the home of a civilian who is not a candidate for public office.  And, the search warrant was based on probable cause to believe that the intrusion would reveal evidence of the commission of a crime or crimes.    

 

The good news is that it's early in the day, and you have lots of time to generate a slightly more believable hoax. 

The FBI operated here without WH input or consent?  That's what the rubes call a whopper of a good story.     

Posted
8 hours ago, Andy1 said:

Have you seen Biden approval rating among democrats? It ain’t great. Much of the party wants him to be more liberal, but that isn’t his nature and the politics won’t allow that to succeed.

 

No one wants more liberalism.  It's going to be a huge problem for Dems going forward.

 

13 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The FBI operated here without WH input or consent?  That's what the rubes call a whopper of a good story.     

 

Even they don't believe it.  They just ignore the lie for obvious reasons.

Posted
26 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

The FBI operated here without WH input or consent?  That's what the rubes call a whopper of a good story.     

Hoax. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, SectionC3 said:

Hoax. 

Maybe you can explain something for us simpletons?  What firsthand information or facts do you have that allow you to state with 100% certainty that you know the truth and the facts and posters that express views that conflict with yours are a "hoax"?  Did you personally participate in the planning and execution of the search?  Did the White House, FBI, or DOJ consult you for your input or provide you with a detailed report of the operation?  Maybe somebody that participated in the action gave you a call and brought you up to speed on how it all went down?  I'm guessing probably not. 

 

So you're in absolutely no position to label anything others say as a "hoax" because you have no capacity or capability of knowing the full truth at this point.  It's just your opinion.  No better, no worse than anyone else's given the situation. 

Edited by All_Pro_Bills
Posted
1 hour ago, Bandito said:

Move out of the US if you want more liberalism. How is that working out for Canada and Europe? We are not those places and don't want to be socialist hellholes run by quasi dictators like Trudeau and the like.

That’s right.  We’d rather all be like Mississippi.  Hoax. 

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Maybe you can explain something for us simpletons?  What firsthand information or facts do you have that allow you to state with 100% certainty that you know the truth and the facts and posters that express views that conflict with yours are a "hoax"?  Did you personally participate in the planning and execution of the search?  Did the White House, FBI, or DOJ consult you for your input or provide you with a detailed report of the operation?  Maybe somebody that participated in the action gave you a call and brought you up to speed on how it all went down?  I'm guessing probably not. 

 

So you're in absolutely no position to label anything others say as a "hoax" because you have no capacity or capability of knowing the full truth at this point.  It's just your opinion.  No better, no worse than anyone else's given the situation. 

Hoax.  You called the position that the WH had no input into the search a “whopper.”  You have no idea whether that’s true.  Hence, it’s a hoax.  Happy hoaxing!

Posted
9 hours ago, Doc said:

No one wants more liberalism.  It's going to be a huge problem for Dems going forward.

This has always been a problem for Dems. The young people in the party have always pushed for change NOW, while the older members often prefer a more incremental pace. The Democratic Party is a bunch of various groups each of whom wants their issues to be the priority. It has been compared to herding cats. Meanwhile, Republicans are more homogenous and willing to follow the party leaders.
 

9 hours ago, Bandito said:

Move out of the US if you want more liberalism. How is that working out for Canada and Europe? We are not those places and don't want to be socialist hellholes run by quasi dictators like Trudeau and the like.

Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, unions fighting for worker rights and fair pay, 

public education, civil rights, environmental laws, etc are all principles of American liberalism. I’m not saying liberal policies are the answer for every issue but most Americans have benefited from liberalism. In my opinion, America, at its best, has a mix of liberal and conservative policies with each side pushing the other side to defend and improve their positions on issues. 
 

Whenever I’ve been to Toronto, people seem to be happy. Hockey is cool. Calling Canada a hellhole is bizarre. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Bandito said:

 The Civil Rights movement was led by Republicans against the racism promoted and used by the Democrat Party (Racism is still a huge part of the Democrat Party platform today).  

Wrong. Conservatives like Barry Goldwater and southern Dems (also extremely Conservative) opposed Civil Rights Act while Liberals Democrats and some Republicans supported it 

 

The Conservative Dems soon became Republicans 

Posted
On 8/31/2022 at 10:23 AM, SectionC3 said:

Hoax.  You called the position that the WH had no input into the search a “whopper.”  You have no idea whether that’s true.  Hence, it’s a hoax.  Happy hoaxing!

You simply proved my point by less repeating what I said.  But refuse to apply the same standard of "proof" to yourself that you insist from others.  You have no idea whether things are true or false either.  So hoax to you too!  You're just willing to buy every story the government is selling because that's what your thinking requires you to do. 

 

Let me guess, hoax! 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

 

 

Goldwater voted in favor of both the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and the 24th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, but did not vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1960 because he was absent from the chamber while Senate Minority Whip Thomas Kuchel (R–CA) announced that Goldwater would have voted in favor if present.

 

 

 

Text of Goldwater Speech on Rights - The New York Times

.https://www.nytimes.com/1964/06/19/archives/text-of-goldwater-speech-on-rights.html

 

WASHINGTON, June 18—Following is the text of Senator Barry Goldwater's speech today on the Senate floor on why he will vote against the civil rights bill

 

Praised civil rights for all, did not agree with the wording of this bill and had proposed several amendments.

 

You should read his actual speech.

 

 

 

This fake "parties switched" narrative has long been pushed by those who don't know actual history and cling to their self-supporting bias.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Bandito said:

The idea that the parties miraculously switched on a large scale is a lie told by Democrats to cover up the racist history of their party as well as to hide their current racism. Democrats are the party of racism and revisionist history. 

Nope. Southern Conservatives were the racists, obviously. That's why they south is now Republican 

Posted
2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

You simply proved my point by less repeating what I said.  But refuse to apply the same standard of "proof" to yourself that you insist from others.  You have no idea whether things are true or false either.  So hoax to you too!  You're just willing to buy every story the government is selling because that's what your thinking requires you to do. 

 

Let me guess, hoax! 

Nailed it.  Hoax.  

2 hours ago, Bandito said:

The idea that the parties miraculously switched on a large scale is a lie told by Democrats to cover up the racist history of their party as well as to hide their current racism. Democrats are the party of racism and revisionist history. 

Hoax. 

4 hours ago, Bandito said:

Yesterday's liberalism is not today's. They are vastly different as today they are outright socialists who are working tirelessly to tear down and ruin the country and trying to turn it into a globalist oligarchy espousing policies of the WEF and Klaus Schwab.

 

Social Security is broke and not sustainable. Same with Medicare and Medicaid. Unions while at the time necessary, aren't needed anymore and have protected horrible employees. They serve special interest groups and not the little guy as they once did. Fair pay? I think fair pay should be $1000 an hour minimum for all workers. Do you support that? Public education in this country is a crock and our system is downright awful. Private schools, vouchers and homeschooling are all much more successful than public schools. The Civil Rights movement was led by Republicans against the racism promoted and used by the Democrat Party (Racism is still a huge part of the Democrat Party platform today). Environmental laws have gone too far and don't protect the environment. Conservationism has helped the environment more than "environmental laws". That is like saying BLM helps black people. It does not. It is a self serving Marxist organization. 

 

Canada is run by a totalitarian regime led by Trudeau, who likely is Fidel Castro's son. The way Canada handled COVID, forced vax to travel and keep your job when everyone knows there is no difference between a vaxed or unvaxed person is totalitarian in nature. Their healthcare system is a mess where people can't get the needed treatment in a timely manner. People in Canada pay a majority of their income in taxes. They get what they deserve.

Lots of hoax here.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Bandito said:

The idea that the parties miraculously switched on a large scale is a lie told by Democrats to cover up the racist history of their party as well as to hide their current racism. Democrats are the party of racism and revisionist history. 

Every single thing from the left is a lie , it's their doctrine.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Bandito said:

Yesterday's liberalism is not today's. They are vastly different as today they are outright socialists who are working tirelessly to tear down and ruin the country and trying to turn it into a globalist oligarchy espousing policies of the WEF and Klaus Schwab.

 

Social Security is broke and not sustainable. Same with Medicare and Medicaid. Unions while at the time necessary, aren't needed anymore and have protected horrible employees. They serve special interest groups and not the little guy as they once did. Fair pay? I think fair pay should be $1000 an hour minimum for all workers. Do you support that? Public education in this country is a crock and our system is downright awful. Private schools, vouchers and homeschooling are all much more successful than public schools. The Civil Rights movement was led by Republicans against the racism promoted and used by the Democrat Party (Racism is still a huge part of the Democrat Party platform today). Environmental laws have gone too far and don't protect the environment. Conservationism has helped the environment more than "environmental laws". That is like saying BLM helps black people. It does not. It is a self serving Marxist organization. 

 

Canada is run by a totalitarian regime led by Trudeau, who likely is Fidel Castro's son. The way Canada handled COVID, forced vax to travel and keep your job when everyone knows there is no difference between a vaxed or unvaxed person is totalitarian in nature. Their healthcare system is a mess where people can't get the needed treatment in a timely manner. People in Canada pay a majority of their income in taxes. They get what they deserve.

Wow… I don’t know where to begin. Hope you are happy. I’ll just say that if something is 70% good and 30% bad, it doesn’t mean it’s horrible.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Liberals haven't changed in over 50 years. Watching Adam 12 now (a 1869 episode). Malloy was in the lunchroom at the local college  he was taking classes at.  They invited him to a "meeting" and has soon as they learned he was a cop, they acted just as liberals do today. Of course the faculty let the spoiled brats  do want they wanted.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...