Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 hours ago, IronMaidenBills said:


Saltine crackers and a bread bowl. 

 

Get real. No way is Beane taking on that many carbs...

 

13 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:

Candy corn

 

So, apparently, this is a thing now?

 

image.png.837ad1dd6bd1bf17e3e2634286a0861d.png

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
On 8/14/2022 at 2:10 PM, Pete said:

Imo Beane makes several deals.  The Bills roster is too deep.  There will be a feeding frenzy on Bills cuts.  So Beane gets something instead of just gifting players to the league.

Cody Ford, Haack, Crowder….there are many potential players traded because of numbers game

what other Bill do you think might get traded?

 

I dont think (m)any trades happen.

 

Other teams know the Bills are loaded with talent and will be cutting several decent players. I get that trading locks the player in as opposed to letting them hit free agency, but I think teams will be willing to take that risk and save their assets.

  • Disagree 1
Posted
23 hours ago, aceman_16 said:

Why do people think we would cut Espenesa?!?! He is on his rookie deal. Keep him cheap and let him go and someone will sign him and it "will count towards" our compensatory picks.

Comp picks only count for free agents lost. If they cut him while still on his rookie deal there is no compensatory pick. 

My guess is no trades.

Going into camp I thought they would trade Epenesa but sounds like he is outplaying Lawson for the last DE spot. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Ethan in Portland said:

Comp picks only count for free agents lost. If they cut him while still on his rookie deal there is no compensatory pick. 

My guess is no trades.

Going into camp I thought they would trade Epenesa but sounds like he is outplaying Lawson for the last DE spot. 

Exactly my point.  He plays out his rookie contract....some team grabs him for a mid range free agent and Buffalo gets a + in the formula.

Posted

There are a lot of candidates for trade bait on this roster right now, some more valuable than others.

 

So I won't be surprised if Beane tries making a move to land a veteran DB or stock on draft picks for next year.

Posted
3 hours ago, aceman_16 said:

Exactly my point.  He plays out his rookie contract....some team grabs him for a mid range free agent and Buffalo gets a + in the formula.

Do 700k contracts do anything lol

Posted
On 8/14/2022 at 4:28 PM, Niagara Dude said:

No one wants Ford ,  he was and still is a major bust. As for trades,  unless you're planning on trading Mckenzie who is pretty good there is no one of great value that is bringing any draft capital back.  

 

Crowder was a free agent and Haack was terrible last season when he had to punt

Hack is the “Punt Dog”. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 hours ago, ExWNYer said:

 

Get real. No way is Beane taking on that many carbs...

 

 

So, apparently, this is a thing now?

 

image.png.837ad1dd6bd1bf17e3e2634286a0861d.png

Fruit Punch, Vanilla Ice cream... ok cool

 

Hot Dog, Hamburger... WTF

 

Popcorn... ehh

Posted
18 hours ago, NewEra said:

That’s why I said highly doubtful.
 

I’d never say never on trading a marginal player.  He has 2 years left on his deal.  We play a system that doesn’t require great corners. We have Tre, elam, Benford and Neal.  Cam Lewis has played well.  If McB thinks highly of Lewis, Benford and Neal, I don’t see why they wouldn’t at least entertain the thought of trading him….. for the right price. If someone came knocking with a 4th rd pick, I wouldn’t be shocked. 
 

again… highly doubtful.  He’s a decent player but he isn’t that good where they may prefer trading him and getting picks as opposed to cutting Lewis and getting nothing. Jmo

Disagree completely on Dane.  He's obviously better than "decent", to earn a non-dress status for preseason game 1.

 

I'm hoping Tre is ready week 1 just as much as everyone else, but we aren't trading the 1 player who has been in the system for 2 years (Dane)...and rolling with 2 rookies against the defending SB Champs. 

 

Benford is a great find, but I think he's going to be a weekly inactive (once Tre is healthy).

Posted
12 minutes ago, Dopey said:

It only took 3 replies to this thread for Edmunds' name to pop up.

 

Someone is always trying to drive him out of town. What's his 'Blue Book' value?

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

The way it's looking Crowder & Johnson could be possibilities to get rid of the money they may have to give them if they are cut Johnson maybe not as much but if Crowder already being hurt given his injury history i could see Beane working a deal with say the Giants ...

Posted

Let me preface this by saying I don’t agree with this, but I was talking with my brother the other day and he brought up a really interesting point-in terms of trade value, McKenzie would probably get the most in return. They could roll with Crowder to begin the year, and if Shakir continues to develop maybe he is the starter by the end of the year.

 

I really like McKenzie, he loves Buffalo, Josh loves him, I don’t believe he would be traded, but he’s definitely an interesting name to bring up

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...