Doc Posted September 23, 2022 Posted September 23, 2022 58 minutes ago, Tiberius said: “Secret Telepathic Unilateral Preemptive Irreversible Declassification” — or “S.T.U.P.I.D.” — defense. But not of taking documents he shouldn't have? Gees, you want him to be above the law Prove nefarious intent. You can't? Then nothing happens, just like with Hilly. 1
Tiberius Posted September 23, 2022 Posted September 23, 2022 15 minutes ago, Doc said: Prove nefarious intent. You can't? Then nothing happens, just like with Hilly. Don't have to. He should not have had them. Just like Britney Greiner 1
SoCal Deek Posted September 24, 2022 Posted September 24, 2022 16 hours ago, BillStime said: lolz So when Obama makes an appearance we’re all supposed to call him private citizen Obama? Really now? Okie Dokie 1
Orlando Buffalo Posted September 25, 2022 Posted September 25, 2022 On 9/23/2022 at 5:40 PM, BillStime said: lolz You refer to former Presidents as President for the rest of their lives, what kind of idiotic point is this post making? Only people who deny elections would ever say otherwise
aristocrat Posted October 3, 2022 Posted October 3, 2022 17 minutes ago, Tiberius said: what if he isn’t?
Tiberius Posted October 3, 2022 Posted October 3, 2022 3 minutes ago, aristocrat said: what if he isn’t? He continues to drag down the GOP
Niagara Bill Posted October 4, 2022 Posted October 4, 2022 It is time. 59 min and 15 seconds into the program. Book 'em, Dano!
BillStime Posted October 5, 2022 Author Posted October 5, 2022 13 minutes ago, Doc said: Did they prove intent yet? No? Then move along. Seriously, stfu with this pathetic argument.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 21 minutes ago, Doc said: Did they prove intent yet? No? Then move along. You got BillSy talking all tough on the internet with your craaaaaazy talk about proof of wrongdoing being required. You’ll be the talk of the virtual water cooler on the imaginary coffee break. One of the most troubling aspects of this scenario—beyond the potential for political malfeasance by the Biden admin and dem DOJ—-is the the desire by the DOJ to stonewall the lawfully appointed Special Master. For all the talk of wrongdoing by Trump, the last thing the Garland DOJ seems to want to do something a comply with the very reasonable review by the Special Master. It’s certainly fair to wonder why that is? 1 1
B-Man Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: It’s certainly fair to wonder why that is? Especially seeing how this was. . . . . . . . . . . . - the greatest security risk in US history . 1
BillStime Posted October 5, 2022 Author Posted October 5, 2022 14 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: political malfeasance by the Biden admin and dem DOJ—-is the the desire by the DOJ to stonewall the lawfully appointed Special Master. What a bunch of malarkey but wait - can you prove intent? lolz
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 15 minutes ago, B-Man said: Especially seeing how this was. . . . . . . . . . . . - the greatest security risk in US history . So grave a threat that the finest of the finest investigators, knowing their actions would be viewed through a political lens, mistook Federal tax returns for top secret intelligence. If the DOJ has nothing to hide, why fight the appointment of the Special Master to begin with, and stonewall once appointed? It’s like they want to establish their own rules of the game. 1
BillStime Posted October 5, 2022 Author Posted October 5, 2022 1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: So grave a threat that the finest of the finest investigators, knowing their actions would be viewed through a political lens, mistook Federal tax returns for top secret intelligence. If the DOJ has nothing to hide, why fight the appointment of the Special Master to begin with, and stonewall once appointed? It’s like they want to establish their own rules of the game. Still spinning? So YOU know they took Trumps tax returns but DISMISS the fact that Trump took nuclear classified documents?
BillStime Posted October 5, 2022 Author Posted October 5, 2022 Trump wants the documents he already sold back - duh TRE45ON
Doc Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 5 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: You got BillSy talking all tough on the internet with your craaaaaazy talk about proof of wrongdoing being required. You’ll be the talk of the virtual water cooler on the imaginary coffee break. One of the most troubling aspects of this scenario—beyond the potential for political malfeasance by the Biden admin and dem DOJ—-is the the desire by the DOJ to stonewall the lawfully appointed Special Master. For all the talk of wrongdoing by Trump, the last thing the Garland DOJ seems to want to do something a comply with the very reasonable review by the Special Master. It’s certainly fair to wonder why that is? Oh noes! I might have to feign being scared. They/them (I'm sure that's her pronouns) is a clown. Always has been, always will be.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted October 5, 2022 Posted October 5, 2022 13 minutes ago, Doc said: Oh noes! I might have to feign being scared. They/them (I'm sure that's her pronouns) is a clown. Always has been, always will be. On the bright side, if any trouble breaks out, you can heal thyself. 1
Recommended Posts