Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 3:35 PM, YoloinOhio said:

 

Expand  

 

Yea, I was definitely in the "Stop trying to make Hodgins happen" crowd a few weeks ago... but from all reports, this guy sounds like a legit option to take WR6.  

 

I certainly would rather bet on the potential of Hodgins vs the ceiling of what Kumerow is, if it comes down to a battle between them for the last spot.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 3:25 PM, hemma said:

 

Kumerow was on O for 116 snaps, ran 46 routes, was targeted 6 times, caught 2 for a total of 28 yards, had 1 drop that was a likely TD.

—- I don’t think his 28 yards on offense will be missed.

 

He played 15 games on STs and made 5 solo tackles, which was 6th on the team.  

There was a day when 5 tackles would have made him an  ST ‘must keep’, but I think those days are behind us.

 

I think Hodgins offers more upside than 28 yards and I think there are others that could kick in as much or more than 1 tackle every third game.

 

just my opinion.  I guess we’ll see.

 

 

Expand  

Now that’s a data-driven response!  Great work hemma!

  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

Sounds like the pendulum swung back in the defenses favor today, does this mean we switch from being overly worried about the defense to being overly worried about the offense?

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 4:31 PM, BuffaloBill said:

 

 

He was supposedly having a great camp last year.  Let’s hope he makes an already crowed WR room even more competitive.

Expand  

He’s had very promising camps each year...only to get injured and miss the season...  If I’m not mistaken.    Hopefully, he continues to improve and stays healthy!  
 

And, yes, he’ll certainly have to play Special teams to make the team. Anyone as far down on the depth chart as him has to.     

Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 4:33 PM, Warcodered said:

 

 

Sounds like the pendulum swung back in the defenses favor today, does this mean we switch from being overly worried about the defense to being overly worried about the offense?

Expand  

 

 

You’re a Bills fan….. you default to worrying about everything.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 4:28 PM, Warcodered said:

 

 

Expand  

The D is pissed they were told to lay down for the red and blue practice 😛 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 3:44 PM, Bangarang said:


what could possibly be gained from watching a few meaningless preseason snaps as opposed to 4 years of actual games?

Expand  

I see your point on this but I just think it’s different watching film versus actually playing against the guy.  

 

  On 8/8/2022 at 3:44 PM, 947 said:

Denver is just as probable a playoff opponent as Indy.

 

It doesn't make sense to have preseason matchups in-conference. I'd much rather see all NFC opponents.

Expand  

Totally agree that preseason should be non-conference.

Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 1:33 PM, hemma said:

If Hodgins can make it through camp without injury, imo - he finally makes the team.

Expand  

 

This is gonna be tough, nothing against him, but this wont be an easy roster to make. 

 

Obviously, Diggs and Davis are going no where, and neither is Shakir given there is 0% chance they could successfully stash him on the PS, not to mention, he has been having an outstanding camp too.  McKenzie as well, he isn't likely going anywhere at this point unless Beane decides he needs to make a trade to make room for someone, then McKenzie might be the only guy who would have any trade value (as they are not trading Davis, Diggs, or Shakir).  But other than that, its safe to pencil these 4 in.  

 

Then you probably still have Crowder and potentially a KR specialist.  Recently McKenzie and even Shakir have taken snaps as the primary returner, so if one of them locks down the job as a primary returner, then that makes the path easier for Hodgins to make the roster.  But we already know they were not happy with McKenzie last year as a returner, and while Shakir did some in college, it wasn't what he was known for.  

 

So if we keep those 4 above, plus Crowder and a KR guy, that would mean we would have to keep 7 WRs for Hodgins to have a chance to make the team.  And that 7th spot will likely also have to be someone who can prove they can be a reliable contributor on ST too.  So not only is Hodgins competing as a WR against guys like Tavon, Stevenson, Kumerow, Pau'u, etc...he also competing to show he can be good on ST, something Kumerow for example has already proven he can be.  

 

Ive always liked Hodgins potential, so be cool to see him keep growing and make the team.  But assuming there are no injuries or surprise cuts/trades at WR, then he likely needs to see us keep 7 to a real chance to make this team, and at the same time prove he can be relied upon on ST.  

Posted
  On 8/8/2022 at 2:14 PM, Beck Water said:

 

It won't crumble without Kumerow, but there's a numbers game - the lower guys on the roster totem pole pretty much MUST play ST or there aren't enough ST bodies to put on the field without risking the starters. 

 

And last year, Kumerow came on as very good at ST.  So unless Hodgins has started playing teams, his path to the 53 looks murky.

 

Anyone know what the practice squad roster rules will be this season?

Expand  

From what I have been reading, Hodgins has been getting plenty of reps with Special Teams.

  • Thank you (+1) 2
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...